Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:13 PM Dec 2016

Is this an appropriate topic to discuss in a tweet?


Donald J. TrumpVerified account
?@realDonaldTrump
The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes


https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/811977223326625792

8 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
0 (0%)
No
8 (100%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this an appropriate topic to discuss in a tweet? (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2016 OP
And the Stock Market just reacted to Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #1
We must stop talking, temporarily, about economics, environment and Eliot Rosewater Dec 2016 #3
Thnking the same. Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #10
dangerous heaven05 Dec 2016 #2
WOW!!!!! Laf.La.Dem. Dec 2016 #4
Give him an Etch A Sketch to play with rather than the nuclear football. BSdetect Dec 2016 #5
yikes.... think Dec 2016 #6
He is an idiot Caliman73 Dec 2016 #7
i think it depends on what you mean by "appropriate" 0rganism Dec 2016 #8
Did he come to this consensus all by himself or did the other kids on the playground vote, too? Vinca Dec 2016 #9

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
3. We must stop talking, temporarily, about economics, environment and
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:35 PM
Dec 2016

civil rights, admittedly.all of which this administration plans on doing tremendous harm to.

There is a very real and present danger of a nuclear war, and an almost certainty of war in some form within days of him taking office.

Will we care less if it is a conventional war and nameless fellow Americans unlucky enough to be in service at the time are who die?

Die we learn anything from Iraq and the cavalier attitude of many about the loss of life and limb? I dont know if we did or not.

One thing is certain, if we thought George W. Bush and Dick Cheney did not understand the real meaning of war and the death and misery it causes which is why they so quickly and using lies went to war, then think about this: The man in charge of that now clearly and undeniably has a personality disorder, whether we call it narcissism and sociopath or whatever we want to call it. He will not think twice about causing death if he thinks it will benefit him, not for an instant.

Maybe we dont stop talking about the other things, but we need to prioritize. First, make sure we are alive, second, address the issues people who are alive care about but arent very important to dead people wiped out by a nuclear war.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
10. Thnking the same.
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:59 PM
Dec 2016

Scary to think these people have zero reality concept of History. We have not seen,or heard anything of a Scientific Nature recently about the lasting effects of Fukushima,and that was a Earth Quake disaster and man made design disaster in waiting.

Looking at what is about to Control our Nation,appears this crowd is the most insulated from reality of any group to ever attempt to Govern.

Looks like a Our Gang Comedy rerun.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
2. dangerous
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:31 PM
Dec 2016

to the people of the world and our planet....what a disaster ameriKKKans has foisted on us all.

Caliman73

(11,727 posts)
7. He is an idiot
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:55 PM
Dec 2016

If he bothered to ever get his intelligence briefings or maybe, read the news, he would know that the US is looking to modernize its nuclear arsenal to the tune of a trillion dollars. A quick Google search resulted in many more than the following articles:

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USNuclearModernization

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/10/26/a-nuclear-arsenal-upgrade/a-trillion-dollar-nuclear-weapon-modernization-is-unnecessary

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-nuclear-future-idUSKCN11W2IW

http://billmoyers.com/story/the-trillion-dollar-question-the-media-have-neglected-to-ask-presidential-candidates/


He thinks that making stupid statements like this will somehow create something for him, some kind of positive benefit, but all it does is destabilize the situation, make our allies nervous, make our rivals laugh (because they already know our plans), and make the stock markets skittish.

Again, I say, HE IS AN IDIOT.

0rganism

(23,935 posts)
8. i think it depends on what you mean by "appropriate"
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:57 PM
Dec 2016

the question of what is "an appropriate topic to discuss in a tweet" just got a lot more complicated

Vinca

(50,253 posts)
9. Did he come to this consensus all by himself or did the other kids on the playground vote, too?
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:59 PM
Dec 2016

There's something very juvenile about a POTUS tweeting at all, but to tweet about nukes is alarming.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is this an appropriate to...