Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TaterBake

(56 posts)
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 01:11 AM Dec 2016

KellyAnne Conway's Bald Faced Lie To Rachel (And Us) Tonight

Kellyanne stated on TRMS tonight "In terms of his relationship with the press, and I don't think Rachel anyone could disagree with the empirically provable fact Donald Trump got more negative press coverage than anyone in modern political history".

Kellyanne said this. No, really. She said this.

Lie.

So Donald the groper, the liar, the con man did get a lot of negative press I will admit. And for every negative "thing" "the press" said about Donald there was 20 negative things said about Hillary's e-mails, foundation, supposed corruption, pay to play etc. There has been an entire industry created to attack the Clintons' in case you haven't noticed. Mostly because they are Democrats, and not because they did anything bad by the way. This billionaire funded attack industry has been after them, and Democratic Ideals for 25 years. What, we can't add that "negative press" Kellyanne?

But for Kellyanne to say "empirically" the lying cheeto got more bad press like it could be proven by analysis is a flat out bald faced lie. A F*CKING LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hillary got a ton more negative press and anyone with half a brain, ears, and at least one seeing eye would have to admit it was true.

Nice try liar. Of course you work for Trump our liar in chief elect. Of course you are lying. Trying to put lipstick on the stinkiest, ugliest, most vile pig in human history has gotta be a tough job Kellyanne...... I hope you fail miserably Kellyanne.

Bernie, the FBI, and the Russians didn't cost Hillary the election.

It was constant non-stop bashing by the corporate scum media. They had an agenda, and reporting news, and facts wasn't on their minds. Ever. When our press is only there for propaganda, and let liars get away with lying non stop, I gotta wonder if it really should be/is free......

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

napi21

(45,806 posts)
1. He did get some negative press...WHEN HE SAID & DID THINGS LIKE MAKE FUN OF A HANDICAPSPED REPORTER,
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 01:25 AM
Dec 2016

JGET CAUGHT ON VIDEO WITH HIS CRUDE CLAIMS ABOUT WOMEN, ETC. However, that the amount of hours of negative press, then quadruple it and you'll have the hours of FREE PRESS he got, from covering ALL of his speeches, guesting on shows like Hardball ofor the entire hour! I want to know why we've never heard ANY MEDIA SPOKESMAN apologize for giving him so much free time that THEY are in part, responsible for his election!

Cha

(317,775 posts)
2. dump only got "negative press" when they were quoting him..
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 01:32 AM
Dec 2016

all the other press was trying to make him "normal".

And, yes the stats show Hillary got exponentially worse press from the M$M******

True Dough

(26,129 posts)
3. I saw oodles of "bad" press relating to Trump
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 01:42 AM
Dec 2016

Multiple reports on multiple issues and gaffes, EVERY DAY!

And despite it, he won the freaking election! It's astounding. He was called out many, many times for the shit he said and the shit he did, but his supporters voted for him anyway.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
5. If by "negative" she means "absence of" or "void"....
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 02:02 AM
Dec 2016

The media sure spent a lot of time airing the image of an empty podium waiting in anticipation for his arrival.

And he LOVED to make them wait.

oldtime dfl_er

(7,168 posts)
6. No!
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 02:27 AM
Dec 2016

This is the same twisted logic Trump used when he said Hillary's ads against him were evil. She used ONLY HIS OWN WORDS.

SammyWinstonJack

(44,315 posts)
7. What's she whining about, looks like it worked in his favor, unlike the
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 02:46 AM
Dec 2016

nonstop all out assault on Hillary by the media and his campaign of lies against her.

Buncha sore "winners". Something not quite right about that, imo.

George Eliot

(701 posts)
8. He got a lot of negative press. Voters didn't care.
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 02:50 AM
Dec 2016

He didn't care. Any press was good press as far as he was concerned. MSNBC was right there giving it to him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»KellyAnne Conway's Bald F...