Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(112,434 posts)
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 02:12 PM Dec 2016

Not Going Back: Drawing a Line in the Sand to Defend Our Rights

Not Going Back: Drawing a Line in the Sand to Defend Our Rights




The policies President-Elect Donald Trump campaigned on, and the platform the Republicans adopted at their convention last July, would turn back the clock on 50 years of progress, not only for women but also for civil rights and human rights. But let’s be clear: These policies have no popular mandate. Although Trump won the Electoral College to become the next U.S. president, Hillary Rodham Clinton won the popular vote by 2.2 (nearly 2.9 now) million votes and counting. To put that in context, Clinton won the popular vote by a larger margin than anyone in history who has not gone on to become the president.

Moreover, on issues such as equality, workplace opportunity for women, educational equity for girls, nondiscrimination of LGBT communities, immigration, ending gender-based violence and reversing the damage to our environment, strong majorities disagree with the president-elect. These majorities must be galvanized to fight back against an erosion of our rights.


Republicans now have control of the House of Representatives, the Senate and the presidency—and could soon control the makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court. With a current vacancy, and more vacancies possible in the next presidential term, Trump may have the opportunity to reshape the Court for generations. The Court is currently split on many of the fundamental issues of women’s equality, and Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court appointments—created with the help of the staunchly conservative Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation—signals the creation of a Court that could likely reverse Roe v. Wade, further curtail voting rights, undermine unions and continue to weaken anti-discrimination statutes. Feminists must urge Senate Democrats to ask the tough questions of any nominee, insist on answers and use the filibuster to block reactionary Supreme Court appointments.

. . . . . .

Feminists must fight back. But we must also be proactive. In particular, the outcome of this election underscores the urgent need to finally ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). Feminists will need every possible tool to fight against state and federal legislation and policies that discriminate on the basis of sex or perpetuate sex stereotypes. To this day, there is no prohibition on sex discrimination in the U.S. Constitution. Given the continuing attacks by right-wing lawmakers on Title IX, abortion and family planning, LGBT communities, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the ERA is needed more than ever.

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2016/12/26/not-going-back-drawing-line-sand-defend-rights/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not Going Back: Drawing a Line in the Sand to Defend Our Rights (Original Post) niyad Dec 2016 OP
K & R ......for visibility..nt Wounded Bear Dec 2016 #1
thank you! niyad Dec 2016 #2
. . . niyad Dec 2016 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not Going Back: Drawing a...