Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atman

(31,464 posts)
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 11:30 AM Dec 2016

BEWARE! Anyone visted "that site" lately?

No link, no promotion...if you don't know what I'm talking about it is of no concern. I haven't clicked in a long time, but I decided to check in and see how they were dancing like a bunch of New Jersey Muslims watching the Twin Towers come down. Oops...no such like. I got this instead...

-----------

YOUR CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE.

The website tried to negotiate an inadequate level of security.

(Name of that site) uses security technology that is outdated and vulnerable to attack. An attacker could easily reveal information which you thought to be safe. The website administrator will need to fix the server first before you can visit the site.

Error code: NS_ERROR_NET_INADEQUATE_SECURITY


-----------

Yesterday I checked in on my phone...it wouldn't let me in, said "Too Many Redirects"

Why am I not surprised?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BEWARE! Anyone visted "that site" lately? (Original Post) Atman Dec 2016 OP
I've avoided it since the election for obvious reasons. cwydro Dec 2016 #1
Same here Runningdawg Dec 2016 #4
Last I looked BainsBane Dec 2016 #2
I never visit that cesspool NastyRiffraff Dec 2016 #3
Last time I went there my Norton told me the site was attempting to collect data from me. nt. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #5
That's essentially what I'm getting, but... Atman Dec 2016 #6
 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
1. I've avoided it since the election for obvious reasons.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 02:50 PM
Dec 2016

Popped over to see what would happen, but I didn't get any of those messages.

BainsBane

(53,029 posts)
2. Last I looked
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 03:00 PM
Dec 2016

They were defending Trump by insisting there was no Russian hack. They repeated Trump's tweet about US intelligence on WMD in Iraq as though it were fact, ignoring how Cheney strong-armed and distorted the intelligence to justify invading Iraq.

They also insisted Assange is absolute is his credibility, which must mean they are fully on board with efforts to promote the right-wing nationalists throughout Europe.

It's time to quit referring to them as progressives and call them what they truly are: fascists.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
6. That's essentially what I'm getting, but...
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 05:24 PM
Dec 2016

...from two similar, but somewhat different, sources;

On my iPhone I have Safari, obviously, which simply gives me the message "Too many redirects. Safari has determined this page is unsafe." On the desktop, under Firefox, I'm getting the message you see my original post. Either way, it appears those slime f00krs are up to something.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BEWARE! Anyone visted "th...