General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf the shoe were on the other foot...
If Donald Trump had beaten Hillary Clinton by almost 3 million votes in the popular vote? But if Hillary had won the electoral vote by only 80,000 votes, over three states, what would be the Republican argument? We can only guess.
But, it they found out that the Russians had interfered in the election, in some manner or other, what would they be saying? They would probably be discussing war with Russia? They would accuse Hillary Clinton of treason and espionage? Who knows?
This is an interesting study in principles and ethics, in my opinion.
madaboutharry
(40,190 posts)The republican party and its leadership possess neither principles nor ethics.
kentuck
(111,052 posts)Sorry to say.
RussBLib
(9,003 posts)The GOP would be outraged by Russian meddling in our election. But since the GOP benefits, most are just fine with it.
Yet another indication the GOP wants to win at all costs, regardless of the methods.
Blinded by their own lust for power.
To quote Trump: "Sad."
treestar
(82,383 posts)how Hillary was not really legitimately elected. They would talk about entering the white House under the cloud of sound trouncing in the popular vote. Hillary would address the voters who did not vote for her and tell them she would represent them. The media would focus on that. The media would wonder whether she should not give Trumplethinskin a cabinet position, so as to respect his PV win.
There would be demands for investigation of the hacking the the R Congress would start up one and also examine what Hillary had to do with it. There would be condemnation of Russia across across the media. Talk of how Bill once visited there and speculation of what he had to do with it.
Chipper Chat
(9,672 posts)3 days before the 2000 election "if Bush wins the popular vote and Gore wins the electoral college there will be so great an outcry from the American people that Gore will never be installed as president." Hmmmmmmmmmmm
demigoddess
(6,640 posts)they don't get treated the same.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)We will never know
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Kaine too so they could install Ryan and claim it was the will of the people.
bigtree
(85,975 posts)...because defenders of Russia, in this case, are really just defending the Trump campaign politics which enabled, encouraged, and exploited Russian interference in our election.
Fla Dem
(23,586 posts)If the roles were reversed, there would be pitchforks and bonfires and the long knives would be out for Hillary Clinton's head on a spit. And yet they all (with a few exceptions) fall in line and kiss Trump's feet.
What went on is nothing less than an attack on America's Democratic election. It was an act of war on a cyber level. Trump's "let move on attitude" merely reinforces my opinion that he very well knew about the Russian hacking in his favor. That he is and will be a Putin puppet, that he has and will have Russian operatives in his circle of advisers and the cabinet; Paul Manafort & Rex Tillerson to name two.
If Trump reverses Obama's sanctions on Russia, then he will be a traitor and will confirm he is working for the Kremlin.
That the Republican leadership isn't going after him tooth and nail, and have fallen on their knees to suck his dick, disgusts me.
FightingIrish
(2,716 posts)byronius
(7,391 posts)The union would be dissolved.
As it is.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)On the presidential election?
byronius
(7,391 posts)Crosscheck, however, certainly served the American Nazis in the presidential count.
I listened to the Majority Report interview with David Daley. The facts are startling -- the GOP is willing to abrogate the basic contract to gain power, which I find treasonous. I think Kris Kobach belongs in federal prison for the rest of his life.
Seriously, if the Democrats engaged in a tenth of the un-American bullshit the GOP does, I'd be just as angry. As soon as someone embraces these tactics, they commit crimes against the United States of America.
The union has been dissolved. This fake election was the fakiest fake election in US history.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)on the presidential vote results.
The reason I asked this question is because I've seen a number of people suggest that gerrymandering has a significant impact on the outcome of the presidential vote. Every time I've seen someone try to explain the connection, though, they've either shown themselves to not really understand what gerrymandering is or how the EC works, or they are talking about congress (but on a thread specifically about the presidential vote). I'm not saying you're wrong at all, but when you mention gerrymandering in a thread about the presidential results, I don't think it's unexpected that people will assume you're talking about the presidential results.
byronius
(7,391 posts)It's an attitude born of absolute contempt for democracy, and indicative of an intent to seize power at any cost.
My statement was intended to expand the focus of the original post. 'Shoe on the other foot' -- if their criminal advantages were reversed to benefit the Democrats, the union would cease to exist much as it already has. Democracy only exists when all citizens respect its requirements, and it is, as James Carville once pointed out, the only alternative to armed combat in the streets.
Karl Rove and Kris Kobach are playing games that may well destroy this nation and the human species. I don't consider the presidential race the only thing we've lost by traitorous, anti-democratic acts, and I think it's important to mention it.
When a Democrat has to win three times the number of votes to achieve parity with Republicans, it's just as destructive to this nation as the Russian knife in our hearts that is Donald Trump.
caraher
(6,278 posts)Of course it turned out the other way. There's no principle to the thing, except grabbing power whenever possible.
H2O Man
(73,506 posts)I had thought it was possible, even likely, that Clinton would win the election, while Trump would carry the popular vote. My concern was that this would result in violent incidents in sections of the country.
The issues of possible foreign influence on US elections is difficult on this forum. I've yet to see what I consider an informed, rational discussion here that places the issue in an accurate context.
H2O Man
(73,506 posts)dlk
(11,512 posts)With respect to principles and ethics, the ends justify the means for the Republicans. They consistently cheat to win and get away with it.
barbtries
(28,769 posts)just everyday, run of the mill, to be expected by now, total and utter hypocrisy. it's become another word for republican in my world.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)1) it would be a nonstop 24/7 news story that Clinton was an illegitimate president.
2) Republicans in Congress would be out there non stop calling to throw out the election results and have a new election.
3) the Koch Brothers and others would be paying for and busing protesters to Washington DC
4) Trump supporters would likely have caused violence in several locations around the country, targeting people or groups that supported Clinton (Planned Parenthood clinics, Hispanics, Muslims, etc)
5) the media would consider it an act of war by Russia.
treestar
(82,383 posts)What's funny is the call to void the election and have a new one has no basis in law, so Democrats don't do it, realizing they would get nowhere. Republicans would call for it (shame or embarrassment seem not to visit upon them) and even assert they could pass a bill to do it. Hell we already know they were going to start impeachment on Jan. 21. Whereas if the other way round, the Democratic Congress would not impeach until they had a reason. The Republicans would just create a reason.
maxrandb
(15,295 posts)Just look at how they reacted after President Obama won 2 back to back Electoral Landslides.
lambchopp59
(2,809 posts)And from what I can tell, they have already danced the sidestep around this with an article that tacitly admits Trump's claim of fraudulent voters is false.
But just try it:!:
a site search for 2016 vote count, 2016 election count, 2016 popular vote count, 2016 popular vote
all bring up the following results:
Please try the following:
Check your spelling
Try more general words
Try using acronyms or using different keywords
Try using fewer words. Your search might be too specific
I sure as hell can't stomach their teevee vomitus, but if their website is any indicator, they are avoiding the subject.
bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)would be drowned out by
"Moscow! Moscow! Moscow!"
itcfish
(1,828 posts)been 102 congressional hearings by now.
niyad
(113,055 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)we would be reacting like them.
Guaranteed.
I don't like anti-democratic tactics no matter who employs them. I'd be looking at the evidence; if the evidence said the Russians elected Hillary, and if the Democrats were using Crosscheck to deny the right to vote to poor and middle-class white conservatives, I'd be just as angry.
The contract is the contract. We either engage in democracy, or we suffer the consequences.
B2G
(9,766 posts)There would be demands for absolute proof that the Russians were involved. There would be rabid defense of the electoral college. Trump would be decried as a sore loser.
Ya'll can deny it, but you know I'm right.
byronius
(7,391 posts)Certainly some would do as you are suggesting. Most people I know would prefer publicly-financed elections with equal air time for the top 100 civil-service presidential exams, just to avoid all this crap.
I want Republicans to feel secure that their vote is being counted. As much as I hate their @%#@ guts, it's either a democracy or it's not. If we were gerrymandering and tabulator-hacking, I would want those practices investigated. Not hard to spot this stuff with dual-party oversight testing. And if a Democrat was responsible, I would want them to go to jail.
I think most Democrats would agree.
byronius
(7,391 posts)Unrecountable electronic voting should be absolutely illegal. And it's only in Red States.
Paper ballots, hand-counted, recount for free upon request. It's the American Way.
spanone
(135,791 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)trumpanzees would be violently reacting while we speak of petitions and sending emails to D.C.