ROBERT REICH: SEVEN THINGS OBAMA SHOULD DO BEFORE HE LEAVES OFFICE

[Alekzander]

. Name Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution gives the president power to fill any vacancy during the recess of the Senate. The Supreme Court is no exception: Justice William Brennan began his court tenure with a recess appointment in 1956.

Any appointments made this way expire at the end of the next Senate session. So if Obama appointed Garland on January 3, the appointment would last until December 2017, the end of the first session of the 115th Congress.

Related: Robert Reich: Rallies and lies. This is how tyranny begins

2. Use his pardoning authority to forgive “Dreamers”

With a flick of his pen, Obama could forgive the past and future civil immigration offenses of the nearly 750,000 young people granted legal status under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Without an immigration offense on their records, they could more easily apply for legal status.


rest of the list: http://www.newsweek.com/robert-reich-seven-things-obama-should-do-he-leaves-office-536804

[PoliticAverse]

1. Robert Reich has written some bad stuff recently...

1 - A recess appointment can only occur when the Senate is actually in recess and a recent Supreme Court decision
clarified and limited the President's ability to do so. The use of 'pro forma' sessions prevents recess appointments.

2 - You can't pardon "future offenses".

And to see some things Obama is actually doing read this article...
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/312162-nearing-exit-obama-seeks-to-tie-trumps-hands

[marybourg]

3. I wouldn't mind him appointing

Garland anyway to keep the Publicans throttling of the government in the news. But it would be hard on Garland and his family.

[Alekzander]

4. Heres How Obama Could Go Nuclear on Trump and the GOP Before Leaving Office

That leaves one potentially big stick in Obama’s rapidly shrinking arsenal: recess appointments of judges to fill scores of federal-bench vacancies — up to and including Antonin Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court.

But wait: Didn’t the Supreme Court eliminate recess appointments in a recent decision? Not exactly. In a 2014 decision, SCOTUS unanimously ruled that recess appointments by the president (which only remain in force until the end of the ensuing congressional session) could be thwarted by Senate “pro forma” sessions that technically keep Congress in session perpetually. But the Senate does have to eventually end the session before beginning a new one on January 3, 2017. And a precedent was set by none other than Republican Theodore Roosevelt that a president could make “intercession” recess appointments in the seconds between one swing of the gavel and the other. TR made 193 recess appointments at the beginning of 1903, and while the legality of the action has been questioned, it has never been clearly overturned. If Obama were to follow this procedure, it would take extensive litigation to reverse it, and it might stand after all.

The pretext for judicial-recess appointments is clear enough: Even after Senate Democrats outlawed the filibuster for non–Supreme Court judicial (and executive-branch) nominations in 2013, once Republicans regained control of the Senate in 2015, they began slow-walking judicial confirmations. At present, there are 103 vacancies in the federal judiciary. When Obama took office there were only 54. He could make the argument that the federal courts have been hamstrung by these vacancies, and use recess appointments to fill some or all of them.

If he really chose to make an object lesson of the fruits of GOP obstructionism, Obama could wheel out the Big Bertha: a recess appointment of his Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, who has been outrageously denied even the courtesy of a confirmation hearing by Senate Republicans ever since his nomination in March. There is another Republican precedent for the recess appointments of a Supreme Court justice (under Eisenhower). Yes, Republicans could thwart it by belatedly taking up Garland’s nomination and rejecting it (though, they could face a Democratic filibuster unless they choose to kill that option, too). But it would sure get everybody’s attention in a way that could not help but cast blame back on those who obstructed Garland’s confirmation in 2016. As Dayen puts it:

It goes without saying that Obama appointing Garland in this fashion would be highly controversial. Indeed, it would make the nation’s collective head explode. Conservatives would demand the Court immediately block the appointment. However, it is likely they would need Garland to participate in a case that gets a ruling so they could have a plaintiff with standing to say they have been harmed by the Garland appointment. And then they would have to move that case through the lower courts. That process would take several months, and all the while the Supreme Court would have a center-left majority.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/12/how-obama-could-still-go-nuclear-on-trump-and-the-gop.html

[FBaggins]

8. The missing piece to that puzzle

Recess appointments only last until the end of the next session of the Senate. Usually that's near the end of the year, but the same court ruling says that the Senate alone determines when their sessions begin and end.

[hughee99]

7. Exactly. Presidents don't have the authority to do some of the things Reich has suggested.

I'm surprised he didn't suggest Obama issue an executive order to outlaw the republican party.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

2. He should also short-sheet all the beds in the White House

(assuming Trump will ever sleep there - it's SO shabby and lacking in gold compared to his faux-Baroque-whorehouse apartment in NYC); put Saran-Wrap over all the toilet seats, and put whoopie cushions on the chairs in the Oval Office.

[Igel]

5. Maybe take all the T keys off the keyboards.

Reroute the Ethernet cables.

And put large sheets of metal on the roof to help block cell phone signals.

(Hey, can't plug the phone lines in the wrong places these days.)


Lots of other immature things could be done, too.

[eleny]

6. You sure know how to turn a frown upside down

[sarah FAILIN]

9. sardines inside the heating ducts....

icy hot the toilet seats...