General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI never thought, in my life time, Franklin Pierce would go from the Gold of worst presidents ever
to the Bronze.
Shit, I never thought Chimpy McPlasticTurkey would go from the Gold to the Silver.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Trump may knock him off the gold platform, but that's yet to be seen.
Ronald Reagan.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Traditionally, it's been Pierce, Buchanan, and either Coolidge or Hayes.
Now it's
Trump
Bush Lite
Pierce
Buchanan
Coolidge
Hayes
Grant
Benjamin Harrison
Taft
Hoover
Even Teapot Dome Harding will be off the list in this historian's opinion.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)And in some ways you could argue that Coolidge was the worst of all.
Why isn't Andrew Johnson on your list?
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I did. As a matter of fact, he's the only POTUS I've ever seen in person. He was my governor when I was growing up, before he became president.
Of course, I could have some personal bias; those Reagan Democrats that helped elect him also, imho, helped bring neo-liberals to power to the detriment of the Democratic Party and the eventual election of Donald Trump. I'm a bit bitter. But I saw what was happening around me during his tenure, and what the constant eroding of liberal and democratic gains led to.
I agree that Trump may become the worst ever. Because I don't want to see it happen, I won't judge that until it does.
As a pro-slavery and pro-expansion (although what president in that era WASN'T pro-expansion) president, Pierce was certainly a bad president, but I don't feel he reaches the level RR did. Of course, I'm just a person, not a committee. I haven't sought consensus.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)in my opinion, Ronald Reagan was the worst so far, with the possibility of being toppled into second place by Trump.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Can you link to one of those?
StevieM
(10,500 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)GWB was a disaster because some of Reagan's thugs were directing him.
malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)I rank these in terms of harm inflicted on the country and our institutions of democracy. Thus, for Trump to surpass J.B. he would have to allow a crisis to develop that leaves some 8 million Americans dead, the equivalent percentage of the population that perished in the U.S. Civil War. So, needless to say, I hope that the orange presidential shitstain is unable to knock Buchanan from his ignoble post.
By the way, by my calculations Reagan and Jackson are close runners-up.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)I believe Jackson is right up there with the damage he did during and his BUSA crap that led to the seven year depression of The Panic of 1837.
Mine are, as I taught before I retired:
Gold: Jackson
Silver: Buchanan
Bronze: AWOL McFlightsuit
But, Trump may go up there. He's not starting out well.
I'd say the removal of voting restrictions started this. John Q. Adams could have been one of best presidents we had, but the commoner couldn't relate to his cold demeanor. So they turned to the Trump of their day.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)I also think that Andrew Johnson needs to be remembered as one of the worst ever, possibly the worst.
malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)No question: Jackson was a disaster in terms of lives lost, economic rupture, and the balance of powers within the government. If you want to put him first-worst, I'll not argue. I
Also, that is a very interesting point regarding JQA and Jackson and our current situation vis-a-vis the shitgibbon-elect. Thanks for making that analogy, I hadn't thought of it before.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)The Radical Repubs in Congress were basically running the show at that point, and Johnson never really had the power to muck things up -- although he certainly tried. And keep in mind, his plan for Reconstruction was originally Lincoln's plan...
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)When the troops left the South, they left the Freedmen defenseless. Enter Jim Crow, KKK power and the road to Plessy.
malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)Gore Vidal wrote a pretty good novel about the election of 1876, not as good as Burr, in my opinion, but still a pretty good read.
treestar
(82,383 posts)the history of the time?
How would Trumpy handle it if he had to deal with Buchanan's situation? Probably a worse disaster.
Fortunately he inherits a good economy and no wars. Compared to that base line, what he does could be worse in relative terms.
Flighty McFlightsuit inherited a good economy and messed it up and started wars that weren't necessary.
You know more about Buchanan than I do at this moment, but I'm wondering if what he walked into wasn't a big mess already.
malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)Buchanan was firmly in charge when the economy faltered, when the Scott decision came out, when Harper's Ferry occurred, and, of course, when the first seven states seceded. It's hard to see how he could have responded any worse to those crises than he did.
And it's hard to imagine how the Trumpuppet would've responded to any of those scenarios, because there was no such thing as Twitter yet.
Still, you are absolutely right that very few presidents have been as lucky as the Cheeto-elect in terms of the health of the economy inherited upon inauguration. I expect the ferret-wearing one to destroy it pretty quickly, as Repubs are wont to do.
treestar
(82,383 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)And he does have a podunk town in the middle of Utah named after him; if that's not love, what is?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)The Brady Bunch attended Fillmore Junior High!