Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Trump is good. Assange helped Trump. Therefore, Assange is good?"
One of the most confusing shifts of the Trump ascendancy is, on reflection, one of the most clarifying.
Donald Trumps, Sarah Palins and Sean Hannitys embrace of Julian Assange who has made a career of illegally obtaining and releasing documents damaging to U.S. interests is not just a puzzling policy shift. It is the triumph of political tribalism over, well, every other principle or commitment.
All three leaders of right-wing populism once saw the risk. Not long ago, Trump recommended the death penalty for Assange. Now he publicly sides with him against U.S. intelligence services. Palin urged the United States to go after Assange with the same urgency we pursue al-Qaeda. Now, we have seen her abject pleading: Julian, I apologize. Hannity once called for Assanges arrest. Now he provides a sympathetic platform for Assanges (and thus Vladimir Putins) views.
Lets be clear about what this means. The president-elect of the United States is elevating a man whom the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., holds responsible for putting the lives of operatives in direct danger. The 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee is bowing and scraping to the man who materially aided the Taliban. Fox News is now an outlet for the Russian version of events.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-is-good-assange-helped-trump-therefore-assange-is-good/2017/01/05/6e596746-d36a-11e6-a783-cd3fa950f2fd_story.html?utm_term=.1422f0066cd5
Donald Trumps, Sarah Palins and Sean Hannitys embrace of Julian Assange who has made a career of illegally obtaining and releasing documents damaging to U.S. interests is not just a puzzling policy shift. It is the triumph of political tribalism over, well, every other principle or commitment.
All three leaders of right-wing populism once saw the risk. Not long ago, Trump recommended the death penalty for Assange. Now he publicly sides with him against U.S. intelligence services. Palin urged the United States to go after Assange with the same urgency we pursue al-Qaeda. Now, we have seen her abject pleading: Julian, I apologize. Hannity once called for Assanges arrest. Now he provides a sympathetic platform for Assanges (and thus Vladimir Putins) views.
Lets be clear about what this means. The president-elect of the United States is elevating a man whom the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., holds responsible for putting the lives of operatives in direct danger. The 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee is bowing and scraping to the man who materially aided the Taliban. Fox News is now an outlet for the Russian version of events.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-is-good-assange-helped-trump-therefore-assange-is-good/2017/01/05/6e596746-d36a-11e6-a783-cd3fa950f2fd_story.html?utm_term=.1422f0066cd5
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Trump is good. Assange helped Trump. Therefore, Assange is good?" (Original Post)
DemocratSinceBirth
Jan 2017
OP
Assange was popular here for screwing over Hillary. No matter how obvious it was
bettyellen
Jan 2017
#2
Gothmog
(180,616 posts)1. Politics make strange bed fellows
The Russians helped elect trump and so Putin is a good guy. Assange helped trump and so he is a good guy. This is getting so weird. The GOP is now the party of Russian lovers
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)2. Assange was popular here for screwing over Hillary. No matter how obvious it was
They never ever accepted that they had a huge bias.