General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Santorum surges from behind in Iowa" - retweeted by Rick Santorum

That campaign still hasn't mastered the double entendre, has it?
Via TBogg: http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2011/12/28/i-dont-see-what-you-did-there/
JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)Yucky! Not that I'm a prude or anything but eeeeeeeeewwwwww!
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Yucky! Not that I'm a prude or anything but eeeeeeeeewwwwww!
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwuuuuuuuuuuuueeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwww!
tavalon
(27,985 posts)Those who use twitter should retweet it, with an addendum to Dan Savage's page. Poor Man on Dog Santorum, it must be a real weight to be that stupid.
Richardo
(38,391 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)Anyone who has lived in the south gets the "Bless his heart, ______________", but I hadn't heard the addition.
boston bean
(36,931 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)Silly, silly me.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)I wonder how this is going to affect those Google searches...
I figure I'd better drop another hint to Google for the top search result for Santorum
tavalon
(27,985 posts)Javaman
(65,711 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Bet it was frothy, fecal, and mixed with rectal lube.
barbtries
(31,308 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)the next day.
usrname
(398 posts)Would the santorum come gushing out?
lindysalsagal
(22,915 posts)so she can stroke the fires of his constituents.
lindysalsagal
(22,915 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Just a thought
jonthebru
(1,034 posts)But generally I can handle it
JBoy
(8,021 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)zbdent
(35,392 posts)with lots and lots of soap and water ...
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)toddaa
(2,518 posts)You got Santorum in my Goatse
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)lapislzi
(5,762 posts)K+R!!!
Enrique
(27,461 posts)this Santorum surge feels so good I have to tell the world about it!
MADem
(135,425 posts)izquierdista
(11,689 posts)...I guess the froth makes itself.
graywarrior
(59,440 posts)I mean, come on!
Anyone wanna offer a thumb?
Skinner
(63,645 posts)racaulk
(11,550 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Someone on the Colbert or Stewart writing staffs should get this one and run with it.
I imagine Rachel M would howl with laughter as well.
QED
(3,352 posts)Is he really that dense?
pauljulian
(45 posts)No... rather, by definition, froth is... well... frothy...
Just sayin'...
stockholmer
(3,751 posts)rocktivity
(45,006 posts)
rocktivity
Bucky
(55,334 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Yes he is a complete dork. But he is an authentic dork - not a fake one. That might even work to his advantage in some circles. He looks like the kind of "real nice boy" that 1950's parents would have "trusted" with their daughter. I doubt that he does have any of the kind of scandals in his background that would likely derail his candidacy.
I suspect even many of his supporters know that he's pretty dorky just as many of Ronald Reagan's and George W. Bush's supporters knew they were electing ignoramuses. But that didn't stop them. I don't think that dealing with a Santorum candidacy would be the same slamdunk that a Gingrinch, Cain, Bachmann or Paul candidacy would be. I suspect it terms of beatability - I would guess it is in the same range as Perry - less electable than Romney or Huntsman - but not impossible like Cain, Gingrich, Bachmann or Paul. Yes, although less than likely - if he did become the Republican nominee - Santorum winning is not absolutely inconceivable.
guitar man
(15,996 posts)Normally he just oozes
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)quickly
Scuba
(53,475 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts).... it is so entertaining to watch the Republican electorate try each candidate on for size and finding them all lacking.
From Bachmann to Perry to Newtie and now this tard gets his day in the sun. Maybe his timing is good and he'll just hit the sweet spot (in this primary characterized as being when the voters know a little but not too much) just at election time.
In any event Iowa is a joke and why that corn-fed state gets to have so much influence is way beyond my comprehension. They may prefer a "strong social conservative" but the country does not.
marasinghe
(1,253 posts)should never be linked in the same post. that's like a law of physics.
47of74
(18,470 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,453 posts)Santorum, er, doesn't have a terribly high IQ, does he?
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)I haven't laughed that hard in quite a while. Thanks for sharing this one.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)It's a rip by Will Bunch:
"I think his biggest problem, politically, is that he talks like someone who's spent most of his adult life as a Washington insider, circa 1990s, and doesn't know how to "bring tha crazy" the way that the talk radio/Tea Party faction of the party likes it. Yes, a man who spoke in a political interview about "man-on-dog sex" isn't crazy enough for the modern Republican Party. Ponder that. And, at the end of a day, Santorum is a man who wears out his welcome -- his 59 percent rejection by Pennsylvania voters in 2006 was the highest I've ever seen for an incumbent senator not facing corruption charges.
Santorum's surge means people may finally look at his actual record. It won't be pretty. The real Senator Rick Santorum was a shameless pimp for Big Pharma who battled to hold back the working class Americans at companies like Wal-Mart and Outback and who founded a charity which was exposed (by Your Blogger) as not especially charitable. Maybe that kind of record is "evangelical," but not in any sense that I'm familiar with."
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/Santorum-surges-from-behind-in-Iowa.html?cmpid=124488469
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)But just can't put your finger on (in public anyway).
sarchasm
(1,309 posts)That's just sad!
Ohio Joe
(21,898 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)BeGoodDoGood
(201 posts)If Santorum surges from behind, is he at least willing to give a reach around?
Walt
murphyj87
(649 posts)Once again Santorum, as Bachmann, Cain, Perry, Gingrich all lead from behind.