Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hallie Jackson (Original Post)
cilla4progress
Jan 2017
OP
cilla4progress
(26,515 posts)1. Except she apparently doesn't understand the
Word privy, as she just misused it
She should have said subject to the emoluments clause, not privy to....
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)2. Can't really blame her...
she probably had all those pee-puns on the brain.
cilla4progress
(26,515 posts)3. GOOD ONE!
GAWD I wish I could pun like you!
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)4. You are too kind.
But my punning skills are lame compared to the brilliant punsters on DU, such as pinboy, Orrex, and many others.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028455491
