General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMiddle aged white guy at the Women's March mansplains the problem
to 500,000 women and their allies. This is about gender based double standards darlin', not about old guard versus new.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/we-have-to-take-over-the-democratic-party-michael-moore-at-the-womens-march/
CAG
(1,820 posts)lapucelle
(18,231 posts)The problem is that it's a man who doesn't understand the problem speaking.
And to be frank, if you think my post is about Michael Moore's gender rather than his message, perhaps you don't understand the problem either.
But feel free to rip me..I'm one of "our own" as well, but I'm a woman.
SticksnStones
(2,108 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)cloudythescribbler
(2,586 posts)It isn't necessary to only say things no one will disagree with or object to or be accused of "mansplaining". He focused on a few basic ideas to spur people to concrete effective action if carried out in sufficient numbers
[confess I myself am not big on calling Congresspeople -- my senators Markey & Warren will generally vote the right way anyway] but fail to see specifically what OP found objectionable in its content -- stating in another comment that issue wasn't Moore's gender
lapucelle
(18,231 posts)Is it your argument that the "we" he was talking about are women and their allies?
http://www.mediaite.com/online/we-have-to-take-over-the-democratic-party-michael-moore-at-the-womens-march/
cloudythescribbler
(2,586 posts)lapucelle
(18,231 posts)It was a political message endorsing one faction of Democrats over another. Men in the progressive wing should not be lecturing women and their allies concerning what "we" need to do. It's tone deaf, presumptuous, and part of the problem.