I am so happy I was wrong

[edhopper]

I said the Press would barely cover the marches.
They seemed to be taking notice in a big way. And more accurately than in the past.

Bravo MSM.

[HassleCat]

1. They're like two year old kids.

They need something bright, noisy and animated to catch their attention.

[herding cats]

2. It was one of the largest protest in US history.

You can't ignore something of that size!

[onethatcares]

4. they managed to with Iraq

now social media has changed the world and our neighborhoods

[malaise]

5. Fox did

The best thing about the protests is that they outnumbered Groper Don the Con's inauguration by a distance

Looks like the biggest protests in history shattered all his illusions of greatness

[herding cats]

7. They didn't cover it?!

That's insane, even for them.

I'm behind a bit on the news, but I did just see Spicer is about do do a press saying Trumps crowds were YUGE!

[anneboleyn]

9. Nope. See my thread about Geraldo. Only Foxer to bring it up all day and claim that it is important

Fox mentioned the marches in a couple of very, very brief news "flashes" earlier today, showing the thinnest crowd pics possible. Geraldo has actually torn into them.

[Rorey]

3. I don't know how they could avoid them....

But I was flipping around stations earlier I noticed nothing on fox. No surprise. I'm looking forward to evening news coverage and I'm especially looking forward to SNL tonight.

[SammyWinstonJack]

6. They can't deny it.

[anneboleyn]

11. Wanna bet? Geraldo just broke the Fox orthodoxy about fifteen minutes ago. Otherwise they were

ignoring the marches.

[SticksnStones]

8. I'm hearing sentences like the largest global rally in the history of rallies

That's news. That's a thing.

[meadowlark5]

10. It's far too big for them to ignore - and it's happening world wide

The sheer size forced them to cover it instead of that orange flabby man child president.

[SammyWinstonJack]

12. They can't deny it.