Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wiggs

(8,851 posts)
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 01:14 PM Jan 2017

Yes. There are those who want an all out, once-and-for-all crusade against

the Muslim world. That believe it's now or never, while we are the only superpower. That the rest of the world is either 'for us or against us'.

If this were unspoken policy, maybe a Bannon/Pence policy merging fundamentalism with imperialism, how would events of the last week look any different? Yes, individual decisions like the Jerusalum/Embassy dust up, hints at Russia alliances, the ban, the DNI/JCS ouster combined with Bannon/Breitbart installation at NSC (Breitbart????), media delegitimization, deliberate distancing of CIA, miiltary build up, etc are all separately heinous...but what is the big picture reason for all these? Is there one and shouldn't mainstream media start thinking about it?

If there is an overarching sprint toward world confrontation...is it correct to stay the fate of the world rests in the hands of the republicans in congress?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes. There are those who...