General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlec Baldwin launches blistering attack on Twitler...
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
dalton99a
(81,568 posts)Big_K
(237 posts)"My hair is red, not orange!"
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)you have a twitter account please please retweet this. This is how we resist and push back HARD.
irisblue
(33,019 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)homegirl
(1,433 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:26 AM - Edit history (1)
I have just returned from a George Lakoff lecture and workshop. My mind is trying to absorb all the information, but one thing is clear-Trump is very smart. One of the methods to be used against him is to deny him what he wants, which we know is to constantly see his name in lights. Do not be diverted from the real issues by his sleight of hand.
The Public's Viewpoint: Regulations Are Protections
By George Lakoff, George Lakoff's Website
29 January 17
he American Majority got 2.8 million more votes in the 2016 election than the Loser President. That puts the majority in a position to change American political discourse and how Americans understand and think about politics. As a start, what is needed is a change of viewpoint.
Here is a typical example. Minority President Trump has said that he intends to get rid of 75% of government regulations. What is a regulation?
The term regulation is framed from the viewpoint of corporations and other businesses. From their viewpoint, regulations are limitations on their freedom to do whatever they want no matter who it harms. But from the publics viewpoint, a regulation is a protection against harm done by unscrupulous corporations seeking to maximize profit at the cost of harm to the public.
Imagine our minority President saying out loud that he intends to get rid of 75% of public protections. Imagine the press reporting that. Imagine the NY Times, or even the USA Today headline: Trump to Eliminate 75% of Public Protections. Imagine the media listing, day after day, the protections to be eliminated and the harms to be faced by the public.
Congressional Republicans called for immediate elimination of regulations from the Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Security and Exchange Commission. What would be eliminated? Protections against cancerous poisons in foods, drugs untested for their safety, unsafe drinking water, air pollutants that get into your lungs and cant get out, fraudulent stack sales, unscrupulous mortgages. That is what our president and Congress are proposing, hiding it behind the word regulations. Words have meanings with real effects.
Imagine reporters finding out and reporting all over America exactly what protections would be removed. Imagine Republican officials, and media in their districts (including social media) swamped with calls, letters, emails, and tweets from voters protesting the removal of such protections, day after day. That is only one example of shifting the frame the word and the meaning of the word to a public viewpoint.
When you hear Regulations are Protections for the Public, think of the details and the consequences. Go beyond the words. Act positively.
A technique for learning how to think and what to say is taking the Publics Viewpoint on every issue. Practice. What would increase the publics wellbeing?
Key Takeaways:
Take the Publics viewpoint instead of the corporate viewpoint.
Shift the frame: always say protections instead of regulations. Protections is a more simple and accurate description.
Remember that regulations represent the corporate viewpoint. It is not a neutral term, and it does not represent the public viewpoint.
Comments
dhill926
(16,351 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)He put his country ahead of his pocketbook. Alec Baldwin is a class act.
spanone
(135,861 posts)Cha
(297,532 posts)that.
leanforward
(1,077 posts)When he's gone the other dips . . . goes with him. dRump is a twit. Barron is the puppet handler.
Talk about a bunch of people being misled.
I am a loyal American in opposition. He needs to be impeached.
YallowTime
(9 posts)And worse is reeeeeealllly bad.....
PatrickforO
(14,586 posts)Baldwin is right. There's got to be some competency test or something.
gademocrat7
(10,665 posts)Augiedog
(2,548 posts)WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)But the question that I keep coming back to is, why couldn't the people that voted for him see that?
klook
(12,164 posts)A lot of them want to see the whole U.S. govt. come crashing down. Unfortunately, one of the most fervent America haters is his chief strategist.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)What bothers me is what they would replace it with.