Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:46 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
#ALERT Tomorrow Trump will be signing a 'Cyber Security' Executive Order. But here it is today. UR wLast edited Tue Jan 31, 2017, 12:21 AM - Edit history (1)
#ALERT Tomorrow Trump will be signing a 'Cyber Security' Executive Order. But here it is today. UR welcome (PDF) http://bit.ly/2klaNHm
Link to tweet ?ref_srctwsrc%5Etfw Link to tweet ?ref_srctwsrc%5Etfw Link to tweet ?ref_srctwsrc%5Etfw PDF: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3424611/Read-the-Trump-administration-s-draft-of-the.pdf EDIT: Trump expected to sign cyber security executive order Tuesday
President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order on cyber security on Tuesday, a source familiar with the situation said, marking the first action to address what he has called a top priority of his administration. The order is expected to commission several different reviews of the government’s offensive and defensive cyber capabilities, according to two other sources briefed on a draft of the order that circulated last week. http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/trump-expected-to-sign-cyber-security-executive-order-tuesday-source/
|
22 replies, 3363 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Madam45for2923 | Jan 2017 | OP |
Ms. Toad | Jan 2017 | #1 | |
Farmgirl1961 | Jan 2017 | #14 | |
Foo Fighter | Jan 2017 | #16 | |
Ms. Toad | Jan 2017 | #18 | |
Cha | Jan 2017 | #2 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jan 2017 | #9 | |
Cha | Jan 2017 | #12 | |
Rex | Jan 2017 | #3 | |
Equinox Moon | Jan 2017 | #4 | |
cynatnite | Jan 2017 | #5 | |
Ms. Toad | Jan 2017 | #19 | |
cynatnite | Jan 2017 | #20 | |
Barack_America | Jan 2017 | #6 | |
xor | Jan 2017 | #21 | |
janx | Jan 2017 | #7 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jan 2017 | #11 | |
janx | Jan 2017 | #13 | |
northoftheborder | Jan 2017 | #8 | |
milestogo | Jan 2017 | #10 | |
Foo Fighter | Jan 2017 | #15 | |
Algernon Moncrieff | Jan 2017 | #17 | |
xor | Jan 2017 | #22 |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:49 PM
Ms. Toad (32,734 posts)
1. So say the idiots
still using insecure androids & private servers.
|
Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #1)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 12:28 AM
Farmgirl1961 (1,479 posts)
14. So -- what's the suggestion for secure cell phones, secure social media sites and the like?
Response to Farmgirl1961 (Reply #14)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:24 AM
Foo Fighter (743 posts)
16. Here's a couple of links
I posted them in post 15 on this thread but will repeat them here.
For Internet privacy: Tor browser: https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en Tails OS: https://tails.boum.org/ Sorry but can't help much with the cell phones. I would need to look into it but don't really have the time ATM. Bottom line: anything that's accessible via the Internet can be hacked. Anything. |
Response to Farmgirl1961 (Reply #14)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:38 AM
Ms. Toad (32,734 posts)
18. I'm not personally going to worry about it.
I just think their actions since election suggest they were tossing aroung big words they didn't understand - so it is kind of laughable that they are tossing around even more words they don't understand, while engaging in at least as risky - if not more - behavior than they accused Clinton of.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:49 PM
Cha (289,579 posts)
2. Thank you, Madam.. :(
Response to Cha (Reply #2)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:54 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
9. Hi Cha! All this is just awful!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #9)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 12:00 AM
Cha (289,579 posts)
12. One day of fighting at a time..
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:51 PM
Rex (65,616 posts)
3. Is he closing our Internets?
That will be declaring war on a lot of deep, dark holes in Cyberspace.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:51 PM
Equinox Moon (6,344 posts)
4. We will be in the streets protesting
...all the while he will be on TV 8pm announcing his SCOTUS pick.
I would bet we will put a damper on his parade. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:51 PM
cynatnite (31,011 posts)
5. Sec of Defense overseeing the Dep of Education??? WTF? n/t
Response to cynatnite (Reply #5)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:41 AM
Ms. Toad (32,734 posts)
19. Not terribly clear -
but I think it's aimed at making sure we're training enough folks with the kind of skills needed for cyber defense/offense.
In a quick read, I don't think it was oversight. |
Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #19)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:36 PM
cynatnite (31,011 posts)
20. Understood. Thanks. n/t
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:51 PM
Barack_America (28,876 posts)
6. Before I click any of this...
...what's the deal with the secretary of defense and dept of education?
|
Response to Barack_America (Reply #6)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 02:36 PM
xor (1,204 posts)
21. I believe it's referring to this part
(d) Workforce Development Review. In order to ensure that the United States has a long-term cyber capability advantage, the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security shall also gather and review information from the Department of Education regarding computer science. mathematics, and cyber security education from primary through higher education to understand the full scope of U.S. efforts to educate and train the workforce of the future. The Secretary of Defense shall make recommendations as he sees fit in order to best position the U.S. educational system to maintain its competitive advantage into the future. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:54 PM
janx (24,128 posts)
7. 7d ?
Aw hell nah. Hell nah!
![]() |
Response to janx (Reply #7)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:59 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
11. Yes that the one about Education
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #11)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 12:04 AM
janx (24,128 posts)
13. Yes, our talent can contribute, but
placing the Sec. of Defense in charge of some kind of higher ed "workforce" is crazy.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:54 PM
northoftheborder (7,518 posts)
8. Can't understand the legalize.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 11:58 PM
milestogo (16,243 posts)
10. So he's going to shut down social media first
and then internet access.
That's what countries with dictators do. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:14 AM
Foo Fighter (743 posts)
15. Section 7, (a)(ii)
(Note: any typos in the following are mine. When in doubt, look at the pdf.)
The Capabilities Review's recommendations shall include steps to insure that the responsible agencies are appropriately organized, tasked and resources, and provided with adequate legal authority necessary to fulfill their missions. (bold is mine) OK, that can't be good. Then we have this: Section 8: Private infrastructure incentives report (i) Preparation of a Report on options to incentivize private sector adoption of effective cyber security measures... Section 8 (c) also discusses inducing private sector owners and operators to "adopt best practices with respect to processes and technologies necessary for the increased sharing of and response to real-time cyber threat information.", among other things. (again, bold is mine) I interpret that as "we will give our buddies in the private sector loads of taxpayer dollars to install our spyware on their networks." What happens to those that refuse isn't addressed but given the track record of the current administration, my guess is that it wouldn't be good. That's also probably where the aforementioned "adequate legal authority" comes in. Two things that may be helpful for those worried about internet privacy: Tor browser: https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en Tails OS: https://tails.boum.org/ |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:30 AM
Algernon Moncrieff (5,751 posts)
17. To the Tweeter's one point: Mattis is probably an improvement on DeVos
At least he understands large group management and has some grasp of public policy.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 02:43 PM
xor (1,204 posts)
22. Well, hopefully this isn't just a way to get the US to do all the hard work for Russia.
We'll compile all the information we have on adversaries and then have it somehow get out to the adversaries so they can adjust their tactics.
We'll also compile a list of all our weaknesses and then have those findings given to our adversaries. |