General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould a Sessions confirmation have stopped DeVos?
I have read a few times now that if Sessions had been confirmed as AG ahead of the DeVos vote, she would have lost 49-50 because Sessions would have resigned as Senator by then and would have been ineligible to vote in favor of her.
If that is true, why did Democrats not try to get his confirmation out of the way? Even though I think he is a horrible choice for AG, he was always more likely to be confirmed than DeVos anyway, so this seems like a squandered chance to stop at least one Trumpling.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Ilsa
(63,781 posts)been irrelevant, it would have denied DeVos because Sessions would have been out of the Senate.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,099 posts)I don't care how many nitwits voted for her. I care that she is now in a position to do serious damage to public education in this country - and might not have been if we could have eliminated one nitwit.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)The racist wants to take away your right to vote.
Blaukraut
(5,979 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)Sessions vote was scheduled for last week.
There is no way for the Democrats to "get his confirmation out of the way".
DURHAM D
(32,952 posts)are the ones who held back the Sessions vote.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)Had Collins and Murkowski not said they'd vote no, they might have stuck with Sessions and voted him in then De Vos would not have been confirmed. But because they said they wouldn't vote for her, they delayed Sessions so he could vote and tie it up and let Pence break the tie
Denzil_DC
(8,906 posts)What did Harry Reid say? Something like "You can rely on Collins's vote except when it matters."
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)Win win for them.
avebury
(11,186 posts)chess players when it comes to politics. There is not much that they can realistically stop but they probably blew the one opportunity that might have actually worked in denying one cabinet choice - DeVos.
The Democrats really need to learn how to play multi-dimensional chess in order to be able to lay out steps that might actually move things towards a desierd end game.
They should be required to watch the movie Miss Sloane. What I loved about the character was her ability to play a multi-dimensional chess game against her opponents and they never saw it coming.
tritsofme
(19,766 posts)Who would surely vote to confirm. Or they wouldn't have let Murkowski off the reservation.
MattP
(3,304 posts)They will stand with us when it doesn't cost the right wing anything at least the hard core tell you to your face
3catwoman3
(28,487 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 8, 2017, 01:09 AM - Edit history (1)
...Collins or Murkowski, if not both, probably would not have voted against DeVos. Theirs were effectively hollow gestures.
That seems like the most reasonable explanation. I get the sense they were allowed to vote against DeVos because Republicans knew there were enough votes anyway. Plus Trump got to push himself into the spotlight again by having Pence cast a historic tie-breaking vote.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)The moment Devos became less assured of passage, the schedule was changed.