Here's the Appeals Court ruling (pdf). Amazing and scathing!

[uppityperson]

I don't know if it's been posted or available in another format, but here's a link to a PDF one. It's very good, scathing in parts and they say no, you can't be a dictator, no, your counsel can't amend EOs and we don't believe you anyway.

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf

[gopiscrap]

1. YES

[triron]

2. knr

[canetoad]

3. State of Washington V. Trump

DENIED

[longship]

4. They cite the Lemon test for first amendment religion violation.

That the law has to have a secular purpose.

Drumpf's words showed the lie to that when he and other administration folks called it a Muslim ban and indicated that they would be preferential to christians.

In other words, there was no secular purpose to this EO.

R&K

Here:
Lemon Test

Note that this alone would be fatal to the Constitutionality of this EO.

[NastyRiffraff]

5. Bookmarking to read tomorrow

Thanks for the link!