Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,902 posts)
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 08:53 AM Feb 2017

"The Other Bombshell in Flynn Story: Contacts with Russia during the campaign"

News stories and headlines overnight are focused on the revelation that Michael Flynn discussed sanctions with Russia’s Ambassador in December phone calls, which flatly contradicts what Vice President Pence, White House Spokesman Sean Spicer, and Flynn himself had previously publicly asserted. The story, broken by Greg Miller, Adam Entous and Ellen Nakashima at the Washington Post, contains a potentially even more explosive revelation: Russian contacts with Donald Trump’s inner circle during the presidential campaign, an allegation that the Trump administration has also previously categorically denied.

..............


III. The New Revelations

Last night’s Washington Post story itself is primarily focused on Flynn’s December phone calls. Nonetheless, the Post also states, in passing: “The talks were part of a series of contacts between Flynn and (Ambassador] Kislyak that began before the Nov. 8 election and continued during the transition, officials said.”

The Post notes that Vice President Pence made two assertions—one dealing with the December calls and the other “a more sweeping assertion, saying there had been no contact between members of Trump’s team and Russia during the campaign.” The Post then writes:

Neither of those assertions is consistent with the fuller account of Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak provided by officials who had access to reports from U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies that routinely monitor the communications of Russian diplomats. Nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters
.

The Post also writes that the Russian Ambassador recently remarked on contacts prior to the election:

“Kislyak said that he had been in contact with Flynn since before the election, but declined to answer questions about the subjects they discussed.”



Way more:
https://www.justsecurity.org/37630/bombshell-flynn-story-contacts-russia-campaign-russian-hacking/

and this:

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The Other Bombshell in Flynn Story: Contacts with Russia during the campaign" (Original Post) kpete Feb 2017 OP
To me that's THE bombshell. That's what makes this the biggest treasonous act against Squinch Feb 2017 #1
I saw that clip of the handshake. Pence didn't even look at Flynn... brush Feb 2017 #2
Yes, but Flynn could destroy Trump if he talks. Don't count your chickens on that "on his way out" Trust Buster Feb 2017 #3
I don't think they need him to talk. They've got the goods on him and much more. brush Feb 2017 #6
And, by "they" you mean the Sessions' Justice Department ? Trust Buster Feb 2017 #7
Of course not. When you've got the Washington Post and New York Times... brush Feb 2017 #13
John Mitchell's Justice Department gummed up the dorks for years. I think Mitchell will look like Trust Buster Feb 2017 #14
Media outlets don't work for the trump admin. brush Feb 2017 #15
Media outlets have limited news cycles in todays digital world. Time is our enemy. Right wing news Trust Buster Feb 2017 #16
Ahhh... what's up? You sound like you want the story to go away. brush Feb 2017 #18
No, I'm just speaking to the reality that now exists in this country. For every media personality Trust Buster Feb 2017 #19
trump got 42% of the 50% of the people who actually voted, which translates ... brush Feb 2017 #21
I will resist as well. But, that has nothing to do with a Sessions Justice Department and a Trust Buster Feb 2017 #22
Pls get off that. Sessions and his DOJ are not all-powerful, just as Mitchell's wasn't brush Feb 2017 #23
Uh, yes they are that powerful. If this country wanted Democrats calling the shots, they would Trust Buster Feb 2017 #24
Apparent realities have a way of changing. Remember the much needed autopsy the repugs... brush Feb 2017 #25
Kind of snarky. I will resist either the best of them. Acknowledging the Republicans strength to Trust Buster Feb 2017 #26
Regarding the repugs and their allegedly all-powerful position... brush Feb 2017 #30
You ignore that the election was illegitimate it seems triron Feb 2017 #27
If Flynn is on his way out, what about Trumputin who gave the order? wordpix Feb 2017 #10
Let us not forget that Trump's dirty trickster, Roger Stone, tweeted on Aug. 21 that the Podesta Trust Buster Feb 2017 #4
Yep. dalton99a Feb 2017 #17
Let's see how long it takes for Republicans to speak out against this in-house traitor. democrank Feb 2017 #5
and it's the Grand Oligarchy Party we're talkin about wordpix Feb 2017 #29
Kick Cracklin Charlie Feb 2017 #8
keep that slow burn going--more info is bound to come out fishwax Feb 2017 #9
ready for a huge conflagration myself wordpix Feb 2017 #11
if it comes out after the midterms, it could be President Pelosi fishwax Feb 2017 #12
Pence knew malaise Feb 2017 #20
Pense DittoTheCat2 Feb 2017 #28

Squinch

(59,522 posts)
1. To me that's THE bombshell. That's what makes this the biggest treasonous act against
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:10 AM
Feb 2017

the American political system in history. And that's not hyperbole.

Think of it: they colluded with Russia to invalidate the American electoral system and install a Russian puppet president.

There is no parallel in history. I can't think of any bigger act against the United States that has ever been perpetrated.

Can you?

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
2. I saw that clip of the handshake. Pence didn't even look at Flynn...
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:15 AM
Feb 2017

talk about a cold shoulder, that was it.

After Pence move past him Flynn's face just dissolved.

He got the message big time that he was on the way out, and well he should be.

If the transcripts of his phone calls say what is being hinted at, he colluded with the Russians behind President Obama's back.

He's in deep shit and it sounds very close to treason.

Wasn't this guy a general? Aren't generals supposed to be smart? How the hell does he not know that the intel community monitors Russian diplomats calls? How the hell does he not know not to go behind the president's back by making promises about the sanctions coming off?

For that matter, how does the whole trump campaign, including its orange leader, think that colluding with Putin and Russia by accepting their help in winning the election was never going to be uncovered?

Too many dummies in that campaign and now the cabinet, including Flynn and DeVos.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
3. Yes, but Flynn could destroy Trump if he talks. Don't count your chickens on that "on his way out"
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:20 AM
Feb 2017

thinking.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
6. I don't think they need him to talk. They've got the goods on him and much more.
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:27 AM
Feb 2017

It's drip, drip, drip, and the drips are betting bigger and more frequent.

This stuff is all going to come out. Flynn is just the first domino.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
13. Of course not. When you've got the Washington Post and New York Times...
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 10:00 AM
Feb 2017

and other media outlets finally putting their best people on it, and the intel community wanting it out, it'll happen.

Watergate happened despite Nixon's Justice Department.

trump's admin has bungled everything since they've been in office.

You think that's going to stop all of a sudden with top reporters looking to become the next Woodward and Bernstein snooping around?

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
14. John Mitchell's Justice Department gummed up the dorks for years. I think Mitchell will look like
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 10:08 AM
Feb 2017

a saint compared to Sessions. And, this Joe Scarborough notion that Congress is the same as it has always been is just plain false. Republicans control Congress and have no motivation to do the right thing. They control oversight power. You inadvertently place your hopes in Sessions and Chaffets. I don't.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
15. Media outlets don't work for the trump admin.
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 10:13 AM
Feb 2017

And Mitchell didn't stop Watergate from breaking.

It'll come out.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
16. Media outlets have limited news cycles in todays digital world. Time is our enemy. Right wing news
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 10:16 AM
Feb 2017

sites will delegitimize main stream reporting on this issue. This isn't your father's country anymore.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
18. Ahhh... what's up? You sound like you want the story to go away.
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 10:28 AM
Feb 2017

Has it occurred to you that there are people in the media who are actual patriots in sense that they are as outraged as many of us here on DU that Putin meddled in our election and very likely helped install his very own stooge in the White House, and they are determined to not let it stand?

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
19. No, I'm just speaking to the reality that now exists in this country. For every media personality
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 10:36 AM
Feb 2017

that is a "patriot", there is now a far Right media personality who will call that "patriot" a traitor. A recent poll showed that Trump supporters trust Trump over the mainstream media by a wide margin. Our country has fundamentally changed over the past 20 years. In this new country, Benghazi was afforded 8+ investigations by Republicans. It has gone totally political and Republicans control the oversight. I would love to see this corrupt Administration held to account. But, I'm not holding my breath.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
21. trump got 42% of the 50% of the people who actually voted, which translates ...
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 10:54 AM
Feb 2017

Last edited Sat Feb 11, 2017, 08:18 PM - Edit history (1)

to around 25% percent of the people. The dumb asses who vote for trump are way outnumbered by we who didn't.

Hold your breath all you want but the rest of us aren't.

We're resisting and will continue to encourage those who snope and dig up the info on this illegitimate pos in the White House.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
22. I will resist as well. But, that has nothing to do with a Sessions Justice Department and a
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 11:03 AM
Feb 2017

Republican controlled Congress refusing to fulfill their oversight obligations to this country.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
23. Pls get off that. Sessions and his DOJ are not all-powerful, just as Mitchell's wasn't
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 11:18 AM
Feb 2017

People find a way. Don't underestimate American ingenuity, especially when treason and fascism are afoot.

God, get some optimism about you.

This Russian/Comey assisted coup will not stand.

Too many people are determined that it will not.

The Flynn story is just the beginning.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
24. Uh, yes they are that powerful. If this country wanted Democrats calling the shots, they would
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 06:41 PM
Feb 2017

have elected them. We are in a very weakened position for the next 4 years. If you wish to ignore that reality, then that is your right. Please don't tell me that I have to ignore the political reality of the moment.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
25. Apparent realities have a way of changing. Remember the much needed autopsy the repugs...
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 07:15 PM
Feb 2017

Last edited Sat Feb 11, 2017, 08:19 PM - Edit history (2)

needed after 2012?

And as I've said before, only 25% of Americans voted for trump so there's going to be continued opposition to his attempts at installing fascism.

We ain't done yet.

Hope you pick the right side to be on.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
26. Kind of snarky. I will resist either the best of them. Acknowledging the Republicans strength to
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 07:18 PM
Feb 2017

obstruct the Russia investigation has nothing to do with the Resistance. It is just measuring the enemies strengths and weaknesses.

 

triron

(22,240 posts)
27. You ignore that the election was illegitimate it seems
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 07:26 PM
Feb 2017

by your implication. Anyway even despite the hacking and voter suppression, Hillary still won by
3 million votes.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
10. If Flynn is on his way out, what about Trumputin who gave the order?
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:48 AM
Feb 2017

I guess catch the small fry in order to catch the big kahuna

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
4. Let us not forget that Trump's dirty trickster, Roger Stone, tweeted on Aug. 21 that the Podesta
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:22 AM
Feb 2017

hack dump was next. This was before Podesta or our intelligence services even knew that Podesta was hacked.

democrank

(12,598 posts)
5. Let's see how long it takes for Republicans to speak out against this in-house traitor.
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:23 AM
Feb 2017

A majority of Republicans in government have, with either vocal approval or winks and nods, okayed just about everything Trump and his administration have done. It's party over country, each and every time.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
11. ready for a huge conflagration myself
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:49 AM
Feb 2017

burn up this admin and start over with HRC or bring Pres. O back

VP Dense looks like is in collusion

fishwax

(29,346 posts)
12. if it comes out after the midterms, it could be President Pelosi
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 09:58 AM
Feb 2017

But that requires work, from all of us, to make sure the tidal wave keeps growing between now and November 2018.

DittoTheCat2

(16 posts)
28. Pense
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 07:44 PM
Feb 2017

I don't think that Trump is smart enough to have put this whole thing into place on his own. He (Pence) is handpicked for VP by someone other than Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The Other Bombshell in F...