Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 03:09 PM Jun 2012

I hate to have to defend Rove, but so far that all sounds like unfounded innuendo to me.

Like others on DU, I would be delighted, I think "Schadenfreude" is the word -- joy in someone else's misery, if it were true, but is there more evidence to back this up?

Is it just a rumor? The article carefully includes the disclaimer language "allegation," etc.

Why are these rumors being repeated on DU when based on so little evidence?

I hate it when people make insinuations about someone's sex life unless they have proof. And even then, what business do we have nosing into someone's sex life if they aren't in office. Rove is influential, but what if he is homosexual or bisexual? What does that have to do with anything important?

Sorry to be a party pooper, but I'm so tired of phony, manufactured sex scandals.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I hate to have to defend ...