General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs a rule I never watch Andrea Mitchell,
but today I had little choice. I did notice that she never said a word about HRC's email. She never let a day go by before the election without banging away on it relentlessly. So what has changed?
I think we should write to MSNBC and point this out. Why was AM so interested in the emails BEFORE the election, but not now? Was she directed by the network via the FBI to sway the public against Clinton?
I know, I know...won't do any good. I just hate to see this person get away with her crap that she calls journalism, year after year!
riversedge
(70,299 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)She's just phoning it in and definitely past her "best-before" date. She needs to retire.
still_one
(92,396 posts)Satellite service to the Family Pack, so I essentially only get locals.
I get my news from Newspapers, BBC, PBS, and haven't missed their bullshit since I pulled the plug on them
get the red out
(13,468 posts)Sigh, but probably not in my lifetime, I'm already 52.
tavernier
(12,401 posts)which I happen to know because it is the day I turned 70.
We are complete opposites!!
get the red out
(13,468 posts)No doubt!
(hope you last forever too!)
tavernier
(12,401 posts)curses another with the line, "May you live forever!"
That would truly be the worst, wouldn't it, in our present forms.