Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

thejoker123

(279 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:14 PM Feb 2017

Are we all being played?

Consider;

Don't you think it's strange that an intelligence community that was so clearly in Trumps corner during the election season is now suddenly tripping over themselves to leak all this incredibly damning information about Trump and his administration just weeks in his taking office?

Why the 180 degree flip?

Could it be that now that the Republicans won the election, their allies in the FBI/CIA who helped sink Hillary are now acting to sink Trump so that he can be impeached and Republicans can remove the insane man baby and install their loyal far right conservative puppet Mike Pence as President?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

blogslut

(38,528 posts)
2. The intelligence community is not a monolith.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:17 PM
Feb 2017

Certain factions were definitely anti-Clinton but Trump straight-up insulted his intelligence briefers during and after the campaign. I think you are mistaken in your assumptions.

 

thejoker123

(279 posts)
4. And where were those other "factions"
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:19 PM
Feb 2017

During the campaign? Plenty of this stuff was known then. Why wait until now?

I think there it's clear there is a script here.

blogslut

(38,528 posts)
6. Dude I don't know
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:25 PM
Feb 2017

Those people work in the shadows. Mark Felt didn't come out until 30 years after the fact.

tblue37

(66,035 posts)
3. The FBI were Trumpy--and possibly only a New York cabal within the FBI. The CIA
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:19 PM
Feb 2017

were not Trump fans, and many former intelligence people signed letters warning he would be a grave threat to national security.

Also, the FBI and CIA often act as rivals engaged in a turf war.

Don't forget, too, that the CIA is a G.H.W. Bush friendly agency.

 

thejoker123

(279 posts)
5. As I responded to someone else...
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:24 PM
Feb 2017

The "dueling" factions or agencies explanation doesn't square. If that were the case, why were the alleged anti-Trump factions silent through the campaign when a lot of this information was known?

rzemanfl

(30,210 posts)
8. I think they thought Drumpf would lose and they could protect sources and
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:27 PM
Feb 2017

methods. I believe President Obama did too.

tblue37

(66,035 posts)
10. They weren't. Former CIA people expressed concern and relayed concerns from current agents
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:32 PM
Feb 2017

who could not speak openly.

I do think the idea that only (or mainly) the NY FBI faction were so anti-Hillary is far less likely. Notice that the CIA are leading the charge against Trump. The FBI might only be going along under pressure, to avoid getting traitor cooties on their public image.

Comey did seem quite inappropriately happy about Trump blowing him a kiss and hugging him in that one video.

MrPurple

(985 posts)
7. Right, all military/civilian intelligence agencies said Russia hacked for Trump before the election
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:27 PM
Feb 2017

And, I'd take President Pence over President Trump. He wouldn't have the Twitler cult of personality disorder and at least he'd be more rational and stable.

Even people in Indiana were sick of Mike Pence. If Democrats can't beat a fundamentalist who calls his wife "mother", we're in serious trouble

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
9. I think it has more to do with the difference between the liberal and conservative mindset
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:30 PM
Feb 2017

I can only speak for me and through my experiences, but I notice liberals tend to be very fact based and not boisterous, while conservatives seem to be the opposite. So they (conservatives) will shoot off half cocked while others are gathering intelligence and building a case.

Still Sensible

(2,870 posts)
12. I think the FBI was clearly in Trump's camp
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:39 PM
Feb 2017

probably expecting a law and order focus, black and white view of immigration, protests, etc...

But I think most of the intelligence community probably understood what Trump and his allies are. I think his poking the intelligentsia is the one thing he should not have done.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
13. Sure. At least some hated Hillary enough
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 12:03 AM
Feb 2017

to try to sink her--looking at you FBIs--but none of them want an erratic nut job in charge. So yeah, the Deep State is taking Trump down. They need to discredit him first so at least some of his followers will abandon him. Hence the focus on Russia--that same base is much less fond of Russia than Trump and his handlers are.

Ms. Toad

(35,272 posts)
14. Frankly, I don't care.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 12:56 AM
Feb 2017

Trump is more of a disaster than I expected him to be - I figured he would be a bumbling idiot too obsessed to get anything done. I didn't count on Bannon pulling the strings. He needs to be out of there.

Pence woudl be horrendous, but work through normal, predictable chanels. Given that Flynn is gone, I suspect that Pence even has a smidgen of integrity. Not a lot - but at least 100% more than Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are we all being played?