General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMassive victory for Obama
Upheld Mandate can't be upheld under commerce clause but can be held up as a tax.
It's fugging Constitutional!
Fuck you Rmoney! Fuck you ReTHUGs! Fuck You Teabaggers!
Fuck You Freepers! Fuck you media hacks!
beaaaaaaaaaaaaah hahahahaha
flamingdem
(40,898 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)wow.
thank goodness.
there is a dog after all.
CanonRay
(16,171 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)DarthDem
(5,462 posts)Or 5-4. I think Roberts started worrying about his legacy.
And this explains what I am some other DUers noted earlier in the week - - Scalia's spitting, almost incoherent dissent in the Arizona anti-immigration decision.
Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)firehorse
(755 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)To destroy Obamacare? Why are corporate Republicans so eager to repeal it? Why has insurance cartel launched disinformation campaign about it?
Because they recognize Obamacare is one step closer to single payer.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)The Insurance industry WROTE this legislation, of course.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)He hates Obama so much that anything that can be seen as a victory for the President is loathsome to him. Hopefully his health will suffer from so much hate and he'll have to resign.
Bake
(21,977 posts)I hope his head (and everything else) explodes over this. He's still pissed about being passed over for Chief Justice. Please, Fat Tony, take your bitterness and retire to Florida where you can be with like-minded idiots!
Bake
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Bake
(21,977 posts)He'd probably take care of it himself.
Bake
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Cutting their noses off to spite their faces.
With regard to the Kochs, not sure this does them any good. Even if more people decide to buy insurance to avoid a tax penalty, are they invested in insurance? As a chemical giant they would be a supplier to the pharms, but does this really add much to the pharms? For the Kochs the gain may have been minimal making an Obama defeat the only concern for them on this issue.
emilyg
(22,742 posts)malaise
(296,118 posts)So will Rmoney still be speaking at noon
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Robert Reich was correct, AGAIN.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)The mandate wasn't going to be enforced in the first place!!!
Way to go Obama
global1
(26,507 posts)Wow!!!!
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)I think they had everything ready and just called it wrong initially. That's the only place I saw "overturned".
GarroHorus
(1,055 posts)I can hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the conservanazis from my house!
mvd
(65,914 posts)many won't lose needed insurance. Single payer is what we want, but this is still better than having nothing.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)yes, I want single payer, and yes, the insurance companies are safe to keep coining cash....BUT, the things that were good about this, the closing of the doughnut hole for seniors, keeping kids on your plan until they are 26, no refusal for pre-existing conditions, especially kids, and the fact that preventive exams have to be covered by insurance, etc.
This still is a good base to start from.
TBF
(36,671 posts)We take it and keep fighting for universal care. Roberts may have helped his insurance buds in the short-term, but it helps us too.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)crimson77
(305 posts)liberalhistorian
(20,905 posts)and call me Maureen, I am truly surprised! I really thought that they'd gleefully seize the chance to strike it all down. HA! Can't wait to hear the weeping and "judicial activism" wailing and gnashing of teeth from the right.
Roy Rolling
(7,632 posts)Of course it's a big victory, but let's show some class in public. In a general sense, I couldn't agree more with your statements and sentiments. But high fives and spiking the ball in their face is what makes us different than the other side.
That being said, this is a great victory for those of us who are sick of the whining by the other side and putting their hopes in the SCOTUS to do their bidding the way they screwed us in Bush v Gore and Citizens United.
Revenge is a dish best served cold.
malaise
(296,118 posts)Listent o Tweety carefully - if this was ruled unconstitutional they would be wielding that weapon.
Fuck every ReTHUG!! Shout it from the mountain top!!!
Raffi Ella
(4,465 posts)Fuck'em all!
I hear ya and totally agree. Spike the ball, but spiking the ball at their feet is taunting. But, man, I totally share your sentiments and agree 100%
Go for it!
And the last thing I would do is the same thing the other side would do---that is why you are different than they are.
It is not a "fuck the Republicans" moment as much as it is a victory for the democratic process and those who believe in the principles of progressivism.
But go ahead and celebrate, perhaps it is I who should just shut up and enjoy the moment. I especially love seeing Fat Tony simmer and blow a gasket.
VWolf
(3,944 posts)I mean, that's what DU is, right?
Like I said, I totally agree and perhaps my post is a little too reserved for such a moment in history.
rocktivity
(45,006 posts)Last edited Tue May 19, 2015, 01:14 PM - Edit history (3)
This was nothing but another in their long series of partisan witch hunt scorched earth attempts to undermine Obama, and they're willing to destroy civil rights, sabotage the economy, and endanger lives to win. When they pay dirty and lose, hell yes run a victory lap -- with spikes on!

rocktivity
NightWatcher
(39,376 posts)I NEVER thought this would stand
Yay, suck it Repukes
maryellen99
(3,798 posts)JohnnyLib2
(11,333 posts)VWolf
(3,944 posts)spanone
(141,628 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Cheers!
BumRushDaShow
(169,761 posts)And now add a "Public Option", and conclude with making it Medicare for all.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)He's easily going to win now.
This is definitely not going to help Rmoney, that's for sure.
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)But his legacy will be a strong one if he wins another term. To finish what he started (positive).
Raffi Ella
(4,465 posts)Ha! seriously, I can't believe it. I also can't believe CNN is reporting it as a loss for President Obama. Blatant spin to go against the President- it's unreal.
Anyway, this feels like a big boost for Us. I am fired up and ready to go: Obama Biden 2012.
Hokie
(4,366 posts)Correction: The Supreme Court backs all parts of President Obamas signature health care law.
Someone at CNN is going to be eating crow with a red ass today.
CherokeeDem
(3,736 posts)This is amazing!!!
Now, can't you hear Romney? "But...but...it was my idea..., really...I created Obamacare...it's mine!"
Blanks
(4,835 posts)NBachers
(19,439 posts)erpowers
(9,445 posts)It is indeed a victory for President Obama.
Glaisne
(645 posts)That this ACA law, especially the mandate is a pro corporate law. It came out of right wing think tanks and was supported by corporate republicans. Corporate conservative Gov. Romney adopted for MA. It hands millions of customers to the insurance industry. Given the pro corporate leanings of the court it is not too surprising that they decided for it. Only when Obama supported it for his health care plan did the rethugs turn against it due to their Obama opposition disorder.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Greybnk48
(10,724 posts)about saying "fug" instead of "fuck." I see you've seen the light.
malaise
(296,118 posts)I like both
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)...Does this bring us closer to eventual singe payer?
Medicare machinery is already in place and now a tax for health care has been upheld. How far away can it be?
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)the work is not done, and don't be lulled into a lack of urgency. Now is the time to make another push.
liberalmuse
(18,881 posts)and 6-3? I have to say I'm shocked. I thought they would throw it all out, or at least some of it. And the mandate won't be enforced.
GreenTea
(5,154 posts)politicasista
(14,128 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Fgiriun
(169 posts)Republicans will now be more driven to vote come November. Maybe it wont have much effect on the presidential election but it sure will on the congressional front. The best thing in my opinion would have been for the law to be ruled unconstitutional and have candidates run under the Medicare for all banner. This goes without saying how the law doesn't address the major scam that is the health care industry.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,433 posts)hamsterjill
(17,577 posts)Surrounded by Repukes (in Texas) with me being the LONE Dem!!!
Go-Bama!!! Go-Bama!!! Go-Bama!!!!
Keep it coming!!!
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)that this could be fuel for Mitt Rob-me's base because of how infuriated the rightists are over this decision.
maryellen99
(3,798 posts)That the original idea for the mandate came from Romney when he was governor of Massachusetts.
renate
(13,776 posts)Given that the right is pissed about this ruling, there couldn't--literally couldn't--be a better opponent for Obama to face in the fall. I can't wait for the debates when Obama congratulates Romney on his ideas becoming the law of the land not just for Massachusetts but for the whole country.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Romney will run against his own plan, but statements he made back when will make him look two-faced and without principles.
Mosaic
(1,451 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)How do you think millions of seniors would feel if their prescription drug costs started rising again.
How do you think millions of young people would feel if they suddenly lost their health care.
All SCOTUS did was prevent a massive fallout against the GOP. The GOP will now start a massive campaign that if they win THEY will repeal Obamacare.
Although I'm glad that people will not lose their coverage I suspect that SCOTUS just handed the GOP a gift.
randome
(34,845 posts)This is yet another black eye for Republicans. Don't you understand how the politics of perception plays out?
The Republicans vowed to repeal the 'evil' Obamacare. And now they can't. They hitched their wagon to the losing side of the argument. Losers always look worse than winners.
Fgiriun
(169 posts)The right wing zombies will be more motivated then ever now. Lets not forget conservatives have control of the media and their opinions resonate with the uneducated masses so we can expect their electorate to vote in greater numbers. These deranged people don't perceive logic or reason, they will act against their best interest and be glad about it.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)First, what do you think happens if SCOTUS overturns this and millions of seniors suddenly have a jump in their prescription plan costs and millions of young people lose their healthcare. That would be an even worse black eye for the GOP. Obama was smart to get parts of the ACA started almost immediately because he knew the more people who were benefitting from ACA the harder it would be to repeal.
The GOP likes their 'boogieman' and for them this year it's 'Obamacare'. YOu get rid of it you get rid of their rallying call. And you're right - they can't repeal Obamacare but what they can do is layer their own healthcare reform on top of it to really fuck things up.
And finally the GOP has SCOTUS as a boogieman too because they'll talk about how it's 'making laws' and how it's stacked and will remind people that 3-4 of those justices could be retiring in the next 4 years - do you want Obama as president or Romney.
If Kennedy has sided with the progressive justices I probably wouldn't have thought this way - Kennedy is notorious for being the swing vote on the court. But it was Roberts, the man hand picked by George W. Bush to lead the SCOTUS in the 21st century for a couple of decades. Roberts took the hit and crossed over to save the GOP Boogieman.
Instead of getting out the champagne I would rather get out and work harder to get Obama re-elected. Roberts gave the GOP a gift and anyone who doesn't see that is crazy.
Mosaic
(1,451 posts)Romney is toast no matter what. Childish cries of 'obamacare' will not work with this stinker.
Trekologer
(1,078 posts)Sure, when the sheep start to realize that the GOP hasn't done anything, they rattle the saber a bit but haven't made a genuine effort. Heck, during more of the Bush administration, they had both houses of Congress and the White House and did nothing. Taking away the boogieman by doing something about it is bad for electability.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)They need their boogiemen issues. Good reply!
Blanks
(4,835 posts)In addition to proving that insurance companies were milking us; the money will help stimulate the economy a little; just before the election.
Yeah, Romney repeal that immediately.
ananda
(35,152 posts)nt
Mosaic
(1,451 posts)He is a Mormon flip flopper extraordinaire. I predict a tiny turnout for this loser by early November. Obama's second term is guaranteed, and he is a great president who achieved a 100 year struggle to improve healthcare in this country.
4lbs
(7,395 posts)1.) Social Security is a mandate that is levied as a tax. That's the SSI portion that is taken out of your paycheck. It goes to pay for your retirement and Medicare.
2.) State Disability is another mandate that is levied as a tax. That's the SDI portion of your paycheck.
So, if anyone cries about "mandates" and "huge tax" tell them that they are already paying two mandates and why aren't they crying about that?
VWolf
(3,944 posts)right up until it's time for them to collect.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)the tax and spend authority of Congress. I shouldn't toot my own horn, but I have to get in a little "told you so." I also predicted that Roberts, father of two children, would decide in favor of the bill.
It isn't that I think that Roberts reached his decision based on personal considerations, but that having two fairly young children, at least still school age I believe, makes him a little more realistic about how the law will affect insurance companies and families.
Scalia and Kennedy had, I believe, fairly large families, but their children are grown. The change from primarily non-profit to nearly overwhelmingly for-profit insurance took place, as I remember it (and I could be wrong) in the 1980s through the 1990s. If you raised your children before that time, or at least got them through their early childhood diseases before that time, you probably don't understand what the fuss about. Insurance was not nearly as prohibitively expensive when these older Justices were raising their children -- and certainly not as expensive compared to average incomes.
EnviroBat
(5,290 posts)YAAAAAAAAA!!!!
MadHound
(34,179 posts)Fuck you American people! Fuck you middle class!
We now are going to be forced to purchase a product from a for profit corporation, in a system that has few price controls.
Yeah, let's celebrate that money be sucked to the top 1%.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Conservative Republican Policy upheld by the Supreme Court!
Democrats claim Victory!
Yes, Alice.
We HAVE fallen down the Rabbit Hole.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)wiggs
(8,812 posts)mandate, let's work together for public option, or additional tax, or single payer as alternatives. He could move the discussion back to the left, where it started before the mandate. That would be a better headline than the one the GOP will create today and which will dominate the news up until another House vote...that the House will re-double efforts to repeal the whole ACA.
The Supreme Court has removed a barrier to continuing discussions....let's take advantage.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)I can' believe it!
love0bama-4ever
(65 posts)I am ELATED, LOVE MY PRESIDENT, WANNA MARRY HIM, I AM CRAZY ABOUT HIM!!!!!!! VIVA OBAMA AND EVERYTHING OBAMA, HE WILL WIN IN 2012, THERE IS NO DOUBT, I AM IN LOOOOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
malaise
(296,118 posts)Hehehehehe