Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Chasstev365

(7,994 posts) Fri Feb 24, 2017, 07:21 PM Feb 2017

Just got home from a long week, so if this idea is already out there, sorry.However:

Why don't ALL media outlets boycott his royal highness. King Donald the 1st in solidarity with banned news outlets?

Who the hell do they think they are?

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just got home from a long week, so if this idea is already out there, sorry.However: (Original Post) Chasstev365 Feb 2017 OP

I've been suggesting that since January 20 Sherman A1 Feb 2017 #1

Weve all been wondering and saying that. I think some other media outlets are boycotting... Jack-o-Lantern Feb 2017 #2

Great question. littlemissmartypants Feb 2017 #3

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)

1. I've been suggesting that since January 20

Reply to Chasstev365 (Original post)

Fri Feb 24, 2017, 07:23 PM

Feb 2017

But, the media makes their own decisions

Jack-o-Lantern

(1,020 posts)

2. Weve all been wondering and saying that. I think some other media outlets are boycotting...

Reply to Chasstev365 (Original post)

Fri Feb 24, 2017, 07:25 PM

Feb 2017

but not all.

littlemissmartypants

(34,182 posts)

3. Great question.

Reply to Chasstev365 (Original post)

Fri Feb 24, 2017, 07:38 PM

Feb 2017

I wish we could just call it "the public record" because words do matter. The fake news narrative itself is fake. Exasperating. I'm running out of f*cks to give.

Reply to this discussion