Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo in Spicer's own words, gov't banning the press makes for a dictatorship.
https://m.In December, Spicer said barring media access is what a dictatorship does. Today, he barred media access.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/02/24/in-december-spicer-said-barring-media-access-is-what-a-dictatorship-does-today-he-barred-media-access/?utm_term=.d5526382ebca
Look, theres a big difference between a campaign where it is a private venue using private funds and a government entity, Spicer replied. I think we have a respect for the press when it comes to the government. That is something you cant ban an entity from.
Conservative, liberal or otherwise, he continued, thats what makes a democracy a democracy versus a dictatorship. I think there is a vastly different model when it comes to government and what should be expected, and thats on both sides.
Conservative, liberal or otherwise, he continued, thats what makes a democracy a democracy versus a dictatorship. I think there is a vastly different model when it comes to government and what should be expected, and thats on both sides.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 4165 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So in Spicer's own words, gov't banning the press makes for a dictatorship. (Original Post)
suffragette
Feb 2017
OP
Yes they did. And their write-up about their method provides a viable blueprint for other
suffragette
Feb 2017
#7
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)1. K&R
suffragette
(12,232 posts)6. Hasn't taken them long to get to this.
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)8. and they'll get worse as more "leaks" come out.
The real ugly is coming.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)10. Working for the Clampdown
world wide wally
(21,739 posts)2. And then he attacked them with his podium
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)3. Guess we'll be seeing Melissa McCarthy again soon.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)9. SNL's reporter cage will be very crowded now.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)4. Reuters got it right last month: Covering Trump the Reuters Way
The first 12 days of the Trump presidency (yes, thats all its been!) have been memorable for all and especially challenging for us in the news business. Its not every day that a U.S. president calls journalists among the most dishonest human beings on earth or that his chief strategist dubs the media the opposition party. Its hardly surprising that the air is thick with questions and theories about how to cover the new Administration.
...
To state the obvious, Reuters is a global news organization that reports independently and fairly in more than 100 countries, including many in which the media is unwelcome and frequently under attack. I am perpetually proud of our work in places such as Turkey, the Philippines, Egypt, Iraq, Yemen, Thailand, China, Zimbabwe, and Russia, nations in which we sometimes encounter some combination of censorship, legal prosecution, visa denials, and even physical threats to our journalists. We respond to all of these by doing our best to protect our journalists, by recommitting ourselves to reporting fairly and honestly, by doggedly gathering hard-to-get information and by remaining impartial. We write very rarely about ourselves and our troubles and very often about the issues that will make a difference in the businesses and lives of our readers and viewers.
We dont know yet how sharp the Trump administrations attacks will be over time or to what extent those attacks will be accompanied by legal restrictions on our news-gathering. But we do know that we must follow the same rules that govern our work anywhere, namely:
Dos:
Cover what matters in peoples lives and provide them the facts they need to make better decisions.
Become ever-more resourceful: If one door to information closes, open another one.
Give up on hand-outs and worry less about official access. They were never all that valuable anyway. Our coverage of Iran has been outstanding, and we have virtually no official access. What we have are sources.
Get out into the country and learn more about how people live, what they think, what helps and hurts them, and how the government and its actions appear to them, not to us.
Keep the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles close at hand, remembering that the integrity, independence and freedom from bias of Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved.
...
http://www.reuters.com/article/rpb-adlertrump-idUSKBN15F276
...
To state the obvious, Reuters is a global news organization that reports independently and fairly in more than 100 countries, including many in which the media is unwelcome and frequently under attack. I am perpetually proud of our work in places such as Turkey, the Philippines, Egypt, Iraq, Yemen, Thailand, China, Zimbabwe, and Russia, nations in which we sometimes encounter some combination of censorship, legal prosecution, visa denials, and even physical threats to our journalists. We respond to all of these by doing our best to protect our journalists, by recommitting ourselves to reporting fairly and honestly, by doggedly gathering hard-to-get information and by remaining impartial. We write very rarely about ourselves and our troubles and very often about the issues that will make a difference in the businesses and lives of our readers and viewers.
We dont know yet how sharp the Trump administrations attacks will be over time or to what extent those attacks will be accompanied by legal restrictions on our news-gathering. But we do know that we must follow the same rules that govern our work anywhere, namely:
Dos:
Cover what matters in peoples lives and provide them the facts they need to make better decisions.
Become ever-more resourceful: If one door to information closes, open another one.
Give up on hand-outs and worry less about official access. They were never all that valuable anyway. Our coverage of Iran has been outstanding, and we have virtually no official access. What we have are sources.
Get out into the country and learn more about how people live, what they think, what helps and hurts them, and how the government and its actions appear to them, not to us.
Keep the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles close at hand, remembering that the integrity, independence and freedom from bias of Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved.
...
http://www.reuters.com/article/rpb-adlertrump-idUSKBN15F276
suffragette
(12,232 posts)7. Yes they did. And their write-up about their method provides a viable blueprint for other
news organizations to follow.
randome
(34,845 posts)5. "The President has repeatedly said he did not 'ban' the media."
"Since the President understands their industry better than they do, he felt their resources were better spent elsewhere. I don't understand why you gibbering monkeys don't report that. NOW EAT MY PODIUM!"