Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 03:27 AM Feb 2017

So in Spicer's own words, gov't banning the press makes for a dictatorship.

https://m.




In December, Spicer said barring media access is what a ‘dictatorship’ does. Today, he barred media access.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/02/24/in-december-spicer-said-barring-media-access-is-what-a-dictatorship-does-today-he-barred-media-access/?utm_term=.d5526382ebca
“Look, there’s a big difference between a campaign where it is a private venue using private funds and a government entity,” Spicer replied. “I think we have a respect for the press when it comes to the government. That is something you can’t ban an entity from.”

“Conservative, liberal or otherwise,” he continued, “that’s what makes a democracy a democracy versus a dictatorship. I think there is a vastly different model when it comes to government and what should be expected, and that’s on both sides.”
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So in Spicer's own words, gov't banning the press makes for a dictatorship. (Original Post) suffragette Feb 2017 OP
K&R Solly Mack Feb 2017 #1
Hasn't taken them long to get to this. suffragette Feb 2017 #6
and they'll get worse as more "leaks" come out. Solly Mack Feb 2017 #8
Working for the Clampdown suffragette Feb 2017 #10
And then he attacked them with his podium world wide wally Feb 2017 #2
Guess we'll be seeing Melissa McCarthy again soon. Ken Burch Feb 2017 #3
SNL's reporter cage will be very crowded now. suffragette Feb 2017 #9
Reuters got it right last month: Covering Trump the Reuters Way muriel_volestrangler Feb 2017 #4
Yes they did. And their write-up about their method provides a viable blueprint for other suffragette Feb 2017 #7
"The President has repeatedly said he did not 'ban' the media." randome Feb 2017 #5

muriel_volestrangler

(101,271 posts)
4. Reuters got it right last month: Covering Trump the Reuters Way
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 05:15 AM
Feb 2017
The first 12 days of the Trump presidency (yes, that’s all it’s been!) have been memorable for all – and especially challenging for us in the news business. It’s not every day that a U.S. president calls journalists “among the most dishonest human beings on earth” or that his chief strategist dubs the media “the opposition party.” It’s hardly surprising that the air is thick with questions and theories about how to cover the new Administration.
...
To state the obvious, Reuters is a global news organization that reports independently and fairly in more than 100 countries, including many in which the media is unwelcome and frequently under attack. I am perpetually proud of our work in places such as Turkey, the Philippines, Egypt, Iraq, Yemen, Thailand, China, Zimbabwe, and Russia, nations in which we sometimes encounter some combination of censorship, legal prosecution, visa denials, and even physical threats to our journalists. We respond to all of these by doing our best to protect our journalists, by recommitting ourselves to reporting fairly and honestly, by doggedly gathering hard-to-get information – and by remaining impartial. We write very rarely about ourselves and our troubles and very often about the issues that will make a difference in the businesses and lives of our readers and viewers.

We don’t know yet how sharp the Trump administration’s attacks will be over time or to what extent those attacks will be accompanied by legal restrictions on our news-gathering. But we do know that we must follow the same rules that govern our work anywhere, namely:

Do’s:

Cover what matters in people’s lives and provide them the facts they need to make better decisions.
Become ever-more resourceful: If one door to information closes, open another one.
Give up on hand-outs and worry less about official access. They were never all that valuable anyway. Our coverage of Iran has been outstanding, and we have virtually no official access. What we have are sources.
Get out into the country and learn more about how people live, what they think, what helps and hurts them, and how the government and its actions appear to them, not to us.
Keep the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles close at hand, remembering that “the integrity, independence and freedom from bias of Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved.”
...
http://www.reuters.com/article/rpb-adlertrump-idUSKBN15F276

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
7. Yes they did. And their write-up about their method provides a viable blueprint for other
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 01:09 PM
Feb 2017

news organizations to follow.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
5. "The President has repeatedly said he did not 'ban' the media."
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 05:42 AM
Feb 2017

"Since the President understands their industry better than they do, he felt their resources were better spent elsewhere. I don't understand why you gibbering monkeys don't report that. NOW EAT MY PODIUM!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So in Spicer's own words,...