General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNever forget that he stood up and did this...
His lies by omission were much more than just "errors," he had committed the crime of perjury in sworn testimony.
What aren't the GOPrs making this distinction?
tblue37
(65,342 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,823 posts)White male republican - that's why they are ignoring the crime
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]
onethatcares
(16,168 posts)the term Xtian because being a Christian is the furthest thing from his mind.
JustAnotherGen
(31,823 posts)I fucked up!
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)neeksgeek
(1,214 posts)pkdu
(3,977 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)oasis
(49,383 posts)FSogol
(45,484 posts)mulsh
(2,959 posts)Senate.
[link:
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)Yes! This needs to be repeated over and over and louder than their weaseling response that Sessions didn't actually talk about anything substantial at those meetings (that didn't happen)
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)and he meant to have his arm tilted forward a bit more?
Raster
(20,998 posts)Canoe52
(2,948 posts)luvMIdog
(2,533 posts)to expecting Scientologists to realize they've been brainwashed and duped
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)Lord knows where he found a flame-retardant bible.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)No matter his intention, his interpretation, or his subsequent backpeddling, he perjured himself. The content is irrelevant, at least with respect to his breach of federal law regarding perjury.
Initech
(100,072 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)malthaussen
(17,195 posts)His lies of commission are enough to warrant firing and prosecution.
-- Mal
Caliman73
(11,738 posts)Omission means that you did not provide information that was relevant. A lie of omission would be:
Panel: Please tell us about your activities during the campaign, where there any communications with foreign governments.
Sessions: During the campaign I spoke with many people and I managed the fundraising activities in the Southern part of the country.
Sessions knows he spoke with foreign governments but he failed to disclose in response to an open ended question about the subject.
In this case Sessions stated actively, that he had no contact with Russians. That was a direct lie not a lie of omission. He actively mislead the Panel about his contact with the Russians not by omitting that he had them, but by actively stating that he did not.
niyad
(113,302 posts)raven mad
(4,940 posts)It wouldn't be the first time.
Sessions, go back to your dogpatch. (I'm not downing Alabama - my daughter and granddaughter and granddaughter-to-be live there, as I did for a number of years.
But the GOP there operates their own kind of dogpatch, and never bothers to clean up the shit in the dog yard.