General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA new troll technique - VERY nasty!
The National Catholic reporter is a very reputable newspaper much despised in right wing Catholic circles because it doesn't trumpet the Party line. Since yesterday, if you go to that site, you get a warning that it has been flagged as containing malware. The site for the Association of Irish Priests had a similar problem. Apparently, if enough people flag a site as containing malware, it will trip a notice from Firefox and Google Chrome.
cross-post from Meta - maybe this kind of attack has been around for a while, but it's new to me!
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,441 posts)that supposedly is politically impartial. The problem is that the Webmaster consistently favors RW bloggers and went as far as to obstruct liberals from posting opinions.
My solution to their bias was to go the Wikipedia page of the newspaper and point to the various blogs and comments that the editor allowed to remain (including racist and homophobic articles). We engaged in a cyber-war as my comments were undone and then I would reverse the edit so my comments were reposted. One of the greatest assets any business possesses is there reputation and they couldn't risk losing their readership or ad sponsors so a truce was finally called and is currently being maintained.
Back to your story--it is disgusting that tricks like this occur but IOKIYAR!
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)recall the exact sites now, but when it occurred I wondered why. As I recall they were some progressive LGBT sites and I bet that's what was going on ... trolled by a different group, like NOM or something.
The RW always resorts to cheating, bullying and thuggery behavior.
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)democrats out of people's yards. And it was last election an opposing republican candidate was filmed tearing down a large democratic sign for his opponent. They are such a bunch of cheats, bullies and liars.
TexasTowelie
(112,441 posts)Caught red-handed and issued a citation for removing the campaign signs of his opponents.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)I recall, yep, same type of individual.
-..__...
(7,776 posts)I went to that site and it has "a good rating based on based on many votes" (on the Google page),
and it has a "good rating based on a small number of votes" (on the NCR homepage).
Seems to me that if there was a deliberate attempt to discredit the site, the 'trolls" would be neg repping the shit out of it.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)for this problem of politically motivated false malware reports.
If the webmasters of targeted sites had an easy way to complain to Google about false malware reports, then Google could run its own sophisticated scans of the site and remove the false reports.
Is Google aware of the problem?