Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRe: Rachel and the tax returns...both things could be true
1) DJT could have leaked them himself.
2) Rachel hyped the story to push the Russia story.
Remember RM did her due diligence by confirming with the White House
So of course the DJT Crew would have leaked the story after RM confirmed were DJT returns (or rather, 2 tired pages of them).
RM may have been making the best of a bad situation.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Re: Rachel and the tax returns...both things could be true (Original Post)
Chitown Kev
Mar 2017
OP
can someone PLEASE tell me why he had to go back TWELVE YEARS to find a favorable return
Skittles
Mar 2017
#1
Is that the last one he actually paid something due to the 18yr write-off from his "loss"?
woodsprite
Mar 2017
#5
She did a good job. It's just the beginning. I just read he's been doing business in Russia for
caroldansen
Mar 2017
#3
Skittles
(153,138 posts)1. can someone PLEASE tell me why he had to go back TWELVE YEARS to find a favorable return
why the fuck is NO ONE asking that question?
Doreen
(11,686 posts)2. Because he is a dick and has us right were he wants us.
Pissed off.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)4. but why are his tax returns from 2005 even relevant?
I want to see the past decade
woodsprite
(11,908 posts)5. Is that the last one he actually paid something due to the 18yr write-off from his "loss"?
I was thinking maybe that was why it was the 2005 return.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)6. I want to see his returns from after he started colluding with Russia
my guess is there will be an extreme drop in reported income
caroldansen
(725 posts)3. She did a good job. It's just the beginning. I just read he's been doing business in Russia for
thirty years. That will be good to investigate. Did he bring that money back to the United States and pay taxes on it?