Sun Mar 19, 2017, 12:31 PM

I'm going to be in the minority here re NK but...

NK has violated 8 agreements and played us the US for suckers.

I hope chump tries to put pressure on china to shut down their nuclear program .

I hope chump tries to negotiate with them.

I don't think this will work.

But this little punk Kim Jung Un is a thug, murderer and dictator.

If he gets long range nukes that can wipe SF off the map, I would want to see some response.

At that point it the US should take out his weapons by conventional weapons.

I know that's blasphemy here but that's how I feel.

Go ahead , flame away

254 replies, 15747 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

254 replies	Author	Time	Post
I'm going to be in the minority here re NK but... (Original post)	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	OP
If you attack NK's nuke sites....	VMA131Marine	Mar 2017	#1
That's kind of the point.	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2017	#4
So we do nothing while he keeps building bigger missiles ?	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#5
Nobody is saying that nothing should be done...	VMA131Marine	Mar 2017	#10
I hope they will.....but I doubt it.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#13
Here's my idea	Yupster	Mar 2017	#83
I think that's been done. It's eliminated family members and generals, but the pissant remains...	WestSeattle2	Mar 2017	#151
Just like Hitler though	Yupster	Mar 2017	#158
The Soviet Red Army got rid of Hitler, fwiw, not his generals. Technically speaking, Hitler	KingCharlemagne	Mar 2017	#186
The generals tried	Yupster	Mar 2017	#199
Actually Russia	Separation	Mar 2017	#230
We use non- war methods like diplomacy and sanctions.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#242
Came to post nearly exactly your point...	Docreed2003	Mar 2017	#8
The US would go nuclear on Pyongyang if it looked like an invasion of the South were succeeding	VMA131Marine	Mar 2017	#14
Plus, there will be NK defections and complete chaos	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#68
An invasion would be fraught with peril for the North	Yupster	Mar 2017	#86
The only way I see NK attacking SK is if we attack NK. The problem is China	still_one	Mar 2017	#91
What's this "By the time we have enough troops to prepare for an invasion"?	former9thward	Mar 2017	#148
It's not a knock on South Korea	Docreed2003	Mar 2017	#161
China won't sit idly on the sidelines	Mendocino	Mar 2017	#9
That is the wild card Mendocino. Trump has pissed off China in a major way, by his comments	still_one	Mar 2017	#93
LOL. What were MacArthur's last words? - nt	KingCharlemagne	Mar 2017	#187
Either never get involved in a land war in Asia or	Mendocino	Mar 2017	#195
Where the fuck did all those Chinamen come from? :)	KingCharlemagne	Mar 2017	#196
Little Big Man	Mendocino	Mar 2017	#198
That's right. Seoul would be in immediate danger.	Kimchijeon	Mar 2017	#51
+1	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#90
no one here is a fan of nk's government and everyone wants pressure on them.	unblock	Mar 2017	#2
+1!	Cha	Mar 2017	#208
just out of curiosity, is there a trump hotel in south korea?	unblock	Mar 2017	#3
North Korea is probably safe	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2017	#6
yeah, my take on this is that tin-pot dictators love saber-rattling, and that fits donnie to a 't'.	unblock	Mar 2017	#7
Except this punk tin dictator is reported to have 16-20 nukes.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#11
NK's nukes are still too big to fit on an ICBM	VMA131Marine	Mar 2017	#16
I was talking about donnie;)	unblock	Mar 2017	#45
Most 'tin-pot dictators' do not have access to the world's largest stockpiles of chemical weapons.	bathroommonkey76	Mar 2017	#18
Chem/bio attack by NK on SK would trigger a US nuclear response	VMA131Marine	Mar 2017	#21
Which would probably begin the end of the world...and if there is a world left	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#75
We only wish...like he's been held to task for anything.	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#95
Trump is so dangerous...I an surprised the GOP hasn't got rid of him already...they have Pence after	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#177
Because their own arses are tied up in all of these scandals	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#180
Must be true...why else would they not let the chips fall where they may?	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#225
I agree with you too.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#238
Stop! We do not fall under The Hague!!!!!!!	yeoman6987	Mar 2017	#134
Is that an order, yeoman6987?	Kingofalldems	Mar 2017	#166
Crimes against humanity do fall under the Hague which is why Bush can't travel abroad.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#176
Of course he will be in the event of a US military attack, he won't have a thing to lose	workinclasszero	Mar 2017	#101
I do not know about that.	Doreen	Mar 2017	#108
China is not giving S Korea weapons	Progressive dog	Mar 2017	#153
I thought I heard that on the news but I could have just	Doreen	Mar 2017	#156
Speaking of non-signers:	guillaumeb	Mar 2017	#28
Nat? What would we expect?	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#109
I was talking about donnie ;)	unblock	Mar 2017	#46
Interesting, thanks. More than I knew. Most insurance	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#88
If the Trump's buildings get destroyed	Progressive dog	Mar 2017	#154
Condos	GP6971	Mar 2017	#12
R U stationed on the DMZ right now?	jpak	Mar 2017	#15
Nope...	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#22
A law suit	jpak	Mar 2017	#34
And you laugh at me.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#42
How many American troops do you want to send?	edhopper	Mar 2017	#17
Good point...whats your practical solution?	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#19
China is leveling serious sanctions against NK...give it time to work.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#25
The real reason China wont exert economic pressure on North Korea	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#31
I don't give a damn-not war! This article is from the South China Morning Post.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#66
No Fox link available?	tazkcmo	Mar 2017	#141
Very well put...and anyone who thinks we should go to war with North Korea	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#237
They are using coal sanctions now...we do not need to go into a war	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#178
+	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#98
Even the U.S. Civil War? Even WW II? - nt	KingCharlemagne	Mar 2017	#188
Of course I hate all war...now the civil war was the most awful in our history...brother against	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#224
A while back I asked a friend of mine who is an A-A elected office-holder (was, not any longer is)	Yupster	Mar 2017	#233
Everyone has an opinion...	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#236
Not many	edhopper	Mar 2017	#44
What containment is that ?	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#53
you're willing to start	edhopper	Mar 2017	#77
If we set off a nuke near China, we are dead. The fallout	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#164
North Korea has just over a million troops ready to fight.	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#163
My solution	Motownman78	Mar 2017	#192
The North Korea problem does not have a good ending in any scenario, imo.	PearliePoo2	Mar 2017	#20
He can do that to SK now.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#23
I have no answer or solution, but I think it's quickly coming to a head. I'm really frightened.	PearliePoo2	Mar 2017	#41
Sounds like we should move them to a safer location	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#100
I posted last night about Generals on MSNBC gaming this.	adigal	Mar 2017	#49
I posted my solution above	Yupster	Mar 2017	#87
Really ?	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#103
No spies involved	Yupster	Mar 2017	#137
These people have nukes...it would be insane to do as you suggest.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#24
Its easy to dismiss the idea.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#36
I posted my solution...China is working on it now as we speak...	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#59
I've seen no evidence that "China is working on it"	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#63
There are sanctions...we should use diplomacy to get tougher ones.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#72
China is trying to weaken Kim. That could be why Kim killed	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#168
We need to weaken Kim, but war won't do that.	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#167
If there had been a simple solution, previous administrations would have attempted it	dalton99a	Mar 2017	#26
exactly-- there are no good answers even for SMART administrations	Fast Walker 52	Mar 2017	#73
Is your solution pre-emptive strikes?	Thor_MN	Mar 2017	#27
Those are direct questions.	Iggo	Mar 2017	#146
Didnt see it, sorry.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#150
So, you are in favor of being the aggressor if the opponent gains a weapon	Thor_MN	Mar 2017	#165
If we strike NK with even one conventional missile	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#169
We heard the same argument regarding Iran and Iraq.	guillaumeb	Mar 2017	#29
Only two people are dumb enough to not use that logic, one is in charge in NK	Eliot Rosewater	Mar 2017	#32
I disagree...................	guillaumeb	Mar 2017	#33
You do? BTW I am not making the argument that fuckface or bannon should do anything, but I	Eliot Rosewater	Mar 2017	#37
Given that most people have a self-preservation instinct.	guillaumeb	Mar 2017	#118
Great...its easy to criticize .	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#38
Criticize Trump? You think I am too hard on fuckface?	Eliot Rosewater	Mar 2017	#40
i thought you were criticizing me.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#47
The problem is who is in power. Pre emptive strike is not the solution in my opinion	Eliot Rosewater	Mar 2017	#50
Absolutely! We are not in Kansas anymore...no Obama, no adult.	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#117
+1	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#113
Here is what we all know, the last human being alive you want in charge of any	Eliot Rosewater	Mar 2017	#30
Here is a question	ProudLib72	Mar 2017	#35
How badly do you wish now all those 3rd party voters and non voters would have	Eliot Rosewater	Mar 2017	#39
Well we aren't going to get any help	ProudLib72	Mar 2017	#64
Fuckface doesn't know for sure they can't reach California...but since they didn't vote for him,	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#67
Right, and in the hopes that calling him names is not productive I wont call him that	Eliot Rosewater	Mar 2017	#70
I don't care what you call him... so fine with me.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#78
It's a good but troubling question that you pose, ProudLib	True Dough	Mar 2017	#92
Some website suggested recognizing NK as a legitimate state	Renew Deal	Mar 2017	#96
If that's what it takes	ProudLib72	Mar 2017	#102
We may need to consider alternatives, like wIran, but we don't have the brain power at the helm now	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#125
It's called nuclear blackmail.	BunkieBandit	Mar 2017	#179
I agree honestly.	Calculating	Mar 2017	#43
Wow...I figured I'd be alone.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#52
I just think your opinion is foolish, no flames	adigal	Mar 2017	#48
+1	demmiblue	Mar 2017	#54
Those are great words..BTW...What containment is that?	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#55
You isolate him even more than he is...and you hit him in HIS financial interests	adigal	Mar 2017	#184
+1	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#60
China has put pressure on NK. Stopped buying their coal.	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#56
I'm afraid that move is largely symbolic.	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#65
That is precisely why China's recent cutbacks make a difference	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#81
I'll agree that China is the only one with any sway in NK	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#85
That is quite true. I forgot about that. This is a real blow to	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#79
+1	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#82
+2	stillcool	Mar 2017	#121
If Putin could install a puppet in the USA without firing a shot it seems we should be able to	KittyWampus	Mar 2017	#57
...not sure anyone can handle crazy NKs toddler dictator, but our crazy toddler Prez fucks up	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#105
Given what NK just said today I think this is worth posting again.	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#58
Bingo	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#69
Bernie reiterates that NK is a threat, but doesn't really have a solution.	Renew Deal	Mar 2017	#99
Don't really want to Bernie-side track this but I did post that clip so your comment is fair.	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#111
Here's a link	Renew Deal	Mar 2017	#129
Thanks for the link!	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#135
I'm not saying it will blow over	Renew Deal	Mar 2017	#144
What keeps Kim from unleashing?	Buckeyeblue	Mar 2017	#61
I think it's because he doesn't have his ultimate toy yet.	PearliePoo2	Mar 2017	#71
What keeps him from unleashing? He's still in power and relatively safe.	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#80
...kinda like our situation w our little donnie. If the heat on him gets hot, he will launch.	Alice11111	Mar 2017	#122
I don't trust Trump at all but luckily we have safe guards in place	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#126
There are no safeguards...Trump could nuke North Korea anytime he chooses.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#239
No clue about what to do	democrank	Mar 2017	#62
Kim Jong Loon vs Trumpster	Calculating	Mar 2017	#74
don't want our punk/thug dictator doing anything - especially without our allies.	spanone	Mar 2017	#76
I think it will happen eventually	Bradical79	Mar 2017	#84
Not Yet	citood	Mar 2017	#89
I think a lot of DUers agree with you	Renew Deal	Mar 2017	#94
Iminent ? ...No	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#116
"imminent" I've learned a long time ago that anything dealing with time is a matter of perspective	NWCorona	Mar 2017	#120
Do you think that NK would pull the trigger on a war?	Renew Deal	Mar 2017	#123
I dont know...but I'm not willing to gamble on that.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#128
Some won't admit it now, but they made the mistake of thinking Bush's middle east war was neccessary	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#240
It's complicated	Renew Deal	Mar 2017	#243
How many South Korean casualties are you willing to accept?	workinclasszero	Mar 2017	#97
Well it might come to that	Calculating	Mar 2017	#104
Hitler didn't have nuclear ICBM's or nerve agents either.	workinclasszero	Mar 2017	#110
Ok so what happens when	Calculating	Mar 2017	#136
If we or our allies are attacked then we defend ourselves or them	workinclasszero	Mar 2017	#204
What nations has North Korea invaded?	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2017	#119
We could at least wait until we have a sane CIC.	Crunchy Frog	Mar 2017	#197
Agree 1000%!	workinclasszero	Mar 2017	#205
What?? They launched this today?	PearliePoo2	Mar 2017	#106
No this was tested about a year ago I guess	workinclasszero	Mar 2017	#115
So you want to start a war with Russia too?	sharedvalues	Mar 2017	#107
So your solution is ?	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#124
False dichotomy. My solution is: have a real state dept, Secy of State, and President	sharedvalues	Mar 2017	#159
I don't actually think Putin gives a shit about North Korea.	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#216
His missles can already reach Washington state.	Doreen	Mar 2017	#112
I'm fine with that	lies	Mar 2017	#114
I believe that was a great policy ... before the advent of nuclear weapons.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#133
Germany never attacked the US in either WW1 or WW2.	oneshooter	Mar 2017	#244
Cmon	lies	Mar 2017	#245
Lets hear it. I am willing to listen. n/t	oneshooter	Mar 2017	#248
Ok	lies	Mar 2017	#249
Listen very closely to what I am typing.	oneshooter	Mar 2017	#250
Which is a ridiculous basis for anything	lies	Mar 2017	#252
Then by all means	tazkcmo	Mar 2017	#127
I'd rather put the money...	stillcool	Mar 2017	#130
So give me your allowable	edhopper	Mar 2017	#131
No deaths are "acceptable".	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#138
So you are advocating a first strike	edhopper	Mar 2017	#142
It will 100 x worse if he gets weaponized nukes.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#152
what makes you think	edhopper	Mar 2017	#162
The point that was made to you that you don't get.	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#171
CHINA, CHINA, CHINA	Cosmocat	Mar 2017	#132
Would've been nice to have someone with international experience steering the ship	Calculating	Mar 2017	#139
E-MAILS, BENGHAIZI, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN	Cosmocat	Mar 2017	#143
Patience can be a virtue re China and N Korea	delisen	Mar 2017	#140
Actually in spite of the bluster - of both Trump and Tillerson -- it looks like they will do	karynnj	Mar 2017	#145
Just one question . . .	ChicagoRonin	Mar 2017	#147
All true	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#149
Look, North Korea has had the capacity to destroy Seoul	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#172
Diplomacy	matt819	Mar 2017	#155
Countries like NK want nukes to protect themselves from us, the only country to have used nukes.	Hoyt	Mar 2017	#157
We should negotiate one on one with NK. No one has tried that.	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#173
I agree. I once calculated that we could have paid every Iraqi more than their per capita income	Hoyt	Mar 2017	#183
You do understand	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#217
I understand that there are countries who have not advanced as we did from	Hoyt	Mar 2017	#218
I'm not "warmongering".	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#220
Read Howard Zinn's description of how slaves lived. NK is better than that,	Hoyt	Mar 2017	#223
I've read Howard Zinn, thanks.	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#226
So, what is gained by thrashing NK except to give the GOPers more support to bomb them. You think	Hoyt	Mar 2017	#227
What's "gained"? Speaking the truth, is what's gained. Saying that this is not okay.	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#229
+Infinity - nt	KingCharlemagne	Mar 2017	#190
North Korea is a totalitarian shithole where families of dissidents are put in concentration camps	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#209
Sounds about like us at times. America First and bomb/nuke em is foolish too.	Hoyt	Mar 2017	#211
Go on, Keep digging.	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#212
I agree with you	JesterCS	Mar 2017	#160
North Korea has viewed us as a threat since the Korean War	Blue_true	Mar 2017	#174
Wouldn't work	Calculating	Mar 2017	#175
There is a much simpler and infinitely less dangerous option to try first: Direct diplomacy.	stevenleser	Mar 2017	#170
I guess those 8 international agreements we made don't count.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#189
Is your post a reply to mine? nt	stevenleser	Mar 2017	#201
Yes	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#213
No, we haven't. Being part of a multiparty effort isn't the same as 1 on 1 negotiations.	stevenleser	Mar 2017	#219
I'm very patient.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#221
Publicly approach South Korea and Japan with the possibility of nuking up themselves.	Trust Buster	Mar 2017	#181
My wife's parents are in Seoul. You threaten them with this propaganda.	yodermon	Mar 2017	#182
This message was self-deleted by its author	roamer65	Mar 2017	#191
You going to enlist, bucko? Or is this more a "Let's you and	KingCharlemagne	Mar 2017	#185
Breaking the ceasefire would be the start of World War 3.	roamer65	Mar 2017	#193
Maybe.	Rustyeye77	Mar 2017	#228
Look, I agree that NK has	liberalhistorian	Mar 2017	#194
I have this discussion frequently with an Asian woman I'm seeing. Here are some things we've said:	NBachers	Mar 2017	#200
What if they nuke Seoul or Tokyo in retaliation ?	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2017	#202
This message was self-deleted by its author	GP6971	Mar 2017	#203
One of the precious few benefits of this catastrophic "presidency" would be if it went after China	Azathoth	Mar 2017	#206
Calling Jimmy Carter!	Rhiannon12866	Mar 2017	#207
One of our best Presidents because of his humility	Cooley Hurd	Apr 2017	#253
His priorities were human rights, telling the truth and keeping the peace	Rhiannon12866	Apr 2017	#254
I'm not going to flame. I will only say that North Korea is a textbook example of why you want	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#210
If MacArthur had listened to Truman instead of his own ego	Warren DeMontague	Mar 2017	#214
The simple truth is that there is no easy solution.	Kentonio	Mar 2017	#215
We're also screwed if NK gets ICBMs capable of hitting mainland US	Calculating	Mar 2017	#222
This doesn't change the truth of what I said though.	Kentonio	Mar 2017	#231
We should bomb them now and thereby starve their impoverished citizens	Orrex	Mar 2017	#246
My bet is that the Chinese are watching this a LOT more closely than they're letting on	DFW	Mar 2017	#232
It's quite clear that you're not all that familiar with N/S Korea politics	MrScorpio	Mar 2017	#234
I'm unlikely to get on board with any surgical-strike sales pitch for yet another war.	Orsino	Mar 2017	#235
I agree completely.	Demsrule86	Mar 2017	#241
It's easy to forget that only one nation has ever dropped atomic bombs, isn't it? On civilians, too.	WinkyDink	Mar 2017	#247
Problem is	SJMULE	Mar 2017	#251

Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 12:37 PM

VMA131Marine (3,550 posts)

1. If you attack NK's nuke sites....

not all of which we can locate, you also have to knock out all the artillery on the Southern border of NK before it flattens part of Seoul. You'll probably also need to commit several hundred thousand ground troops to stop the invasion of SK by over a million NK troops.

I'm going to be in the minority here re NK but...

1. If you attack NK's nuke sites....

4. That's kind of the point.

5. So we do nothing while he keeps building bigger missiles ?

10. Nobody is saying that nothing should be done...

13. I hope they will.....but I doubt it.

83. Here's my idea

151. I think that's been done. It's eliminated family members and generals, but the pissant remains...

158. Just like Hitler though

186. The Soviet Red Army got rid of Hitler, fwiw, not his generals. Technically speaking, Hitler

199. The generals tried

230. Actually Russia

242. We use non- war methods like diplomacy and sanctions.

8. Came to post nearly exactly your point...

14. The US would go nuclear on Pyongyang if it looked like an invasion of the South were succeeding

68. Plus, there will be NK defections and complete chaos

86. An invasion would be fraught with peril for the North

91. The only way I see NK attacking SK is if we attack NK. The problem is China

148. What's this "By the time we have enough troops to prepare for an invasion"?

161. It's not a knock on South Korea

9. China won't sit idly on the sidelines

93. That is the wild card Mendocino. Trump has pissed off China in a major way, by his comments

187. LOL. What were MacArthur's last words? - nt

195. Either never get involved in a land war in Asia or

196. Where the fuck did all those Chinamen come from? :)

198. Little Big Man

51. That's right. Seoul would be in immediate danger.

90. +1

2. no one here is a fan of nk's government and everyone wants pressure on them.

208. +1!

3. just out of curiosity, is there a trump hotel in south korea?

6. North Korea is probably safe

7. yeah, my take on this is that tin-pot dictators love saber-rattling, and that fits donnie to a 't'.

11. Except this punk tin dictator is reported to have 16-20 nukes.

16. NK's nukes are still too big to fit on an ICBM

45. I was talking about donnie;)

18. Most 'tin-pot dictators' do not have access to the world's largest stockpiles of chemical weapons.

21. Chem/bio attack by NK on SK would trigger a US nuclear response

75. Which would probably begin the end of the world...and if there is a world left

95. We only wish...like he's been held to task for anything.

177. Trump is so dangerous...I an surprised the GOP hasn't got rid of him already...they have Pence after

180. Because their own arses are tied up in all of these scandals

225. Must be true...why else would they not let the chips fall where they may?

238. I agree with you too.

134. Stop! We do not fall under The Hague!!!!!!!

166. Is that an order, yeoman6987?

176. Crimes against humanity do fall under the Hague which is why Bush can't travel abroad.

101. Of course he will be in the event of a US military attack, he won't have a thing to lose

108. I do not know about that.

153. China is not giving S Korea weapons

156. I thought I heard that on the news but I could have just

28. Speaking of non-signers:

109. Nat? What would we expect?

46. I was talking about donnie ;)

88. Interesting, thanks. More than I knew. Most insurance

154. If the Trump's buildings get destroyed

12. Condos

15. R U stationed on the DMZ right now?

22. Nope...

34. A law suit

42. And you laugh at me.

17. How many American troops do you want to send?

19. Good point...whats your practical solution?

25. China is leveling serious sanctions against NK...give it time to work.

31. The real reason China wont exert economic pressure on North Korea

66. I don't give a damn-not war! This article is from the South China Morning Post.

141. No Fox link available?

237. Very well put...and anyone who thinks we should go to war with North Korea

178. They are using coal sanctions now...we do not need to go into a war

98. +

188. Even the U.S. Civil War? Even WW II? - nt

224. Of course I hate all war...now the civil war was the most awful in our history...brother against

233. A while back I asked a friend of mine who is an A-A elected office-holder (was, not any longer is)

236. Everyone has an opinion...

44. Not many

53. What containment is that ?

77. you're willing to start

164. If we set off a nuke near China, we are dead. The fallout

163. North Korea has just over a million troops ready to fight.

192. My solution