Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:25 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
Kim Jong-Un vows to reduce the US to ashes with nuke strikes if DT fires even a single bulllet
The statement said: “The Korean People’s Army will reduce the bases of aggression and provocation to ashes with its invincible Hwasong rockets tipped with nuclear warheads and reliably defend the security of the country and its people’s happiness in case the US and the South Korean puppet forces fire even a single bullet at the territory of the DPRK.”
The menacing talk came as South Korea warned that its northern neighbour’s latest rocket-engine test showed “meaningful” progress. The North’s KCNA news agency said on Sunday the engine would help the country achieve world-class satellite-launch capability – indicating a new type of rocket engine for an intercontinental ballistic missile. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3131278/kim-jong-un-nuclear-weapons-donald-trump-north-korea/ Screw you Kimmie
|
80 replies, 4191 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | OP |
Jim__ | Mar 2017 | #1 | |
rzemanfl | Mar 2017 | #2 | |
KingCharlemagne | Mar 2017 | #76 | |
TheFrenchRazor | Mar 2017 | #3 | |
Buns_of_Fire | Mar 2017 | #4 | |
Kimchijeon | Mar 2017 | #12 | |
Eliot Rosewater | Mar 2017 | #26 | |
KingCharlemagne | Mar 2017 | #77 | |
gratuitous | Mar 2017 | #13 | |
marybourg | Mar 2017 | #33 | |
KewlKat | Mar 2017 | #5 | |
Turbineguy | Mar 2017 | #6 | |
BSdetect | Mar 2017 | #7 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #8 | |
EX500rider | Mar 2017 | #9 | |
A HERETIC I AM | Mar 2017 | #67 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #15 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #19 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #20 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #21 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #22 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #23 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #24 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #25 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #27 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #28 | |
LanternWaste | Mar 2017 | #68 | |
lunasun | Mar 2017 | #57 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #59 | |
lunasun | Mar 2017 | #62 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #66 | |
yeoman6987 | Mar 2017 | #51 | |
Kingofalldems | Mar 2017 | #52 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #58 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #53 | |
yeoman6987 | Mar 2017 | #55 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #56 | |
yeoman6987 | Mar 2017 | #60 | |
Kingofalldems | Mar 2017 | #64 | |
Iggo | Mar 2017 | #29 | |
Denzil_DC | Mar 2017 | #10 | |
former9thward | Mar 2017 | #32 | |
Denzil_DC | Mar 2017 | #34 | |
former9thward | Mar 2017 | #35 | |
Denzil_DC | Mar 2017 | #36 | |
former9thward | Mar 2017 | #42 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #40 | |
maryellen99 | Mar 2017 | #38 | |
former9thward | Mar 2017 | #41 | |
maryellen99 | Mar 2017 | #43 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #46 | |
maryellen99 | Mar 2017 | #47 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #50 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #54 | |
Rustyeye77 | Mar 2017 | #61 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #63 | |
derby378 | Mar 2017 | #11 | |
catsudon | Mar 2017 | #16 | |
Lurks Often | Mar 2017 | #14 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #18 | |
Oneironaut | Mar 2017 | #72 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #74 | |
Freethinker65 | Mar 2017 | #17 | |
hunter | Mar 2017 | #30 | |
dalton99a | Mar 2017 | #31 | |
Adrahil | Mar 2017 | #37 | |
JDC | Mar 2017 | #39 | |
Bucky | Mar 2017 | #44 | |
Warren DeMontague | Mar 2017 | #45 | |
LanternWaste | Mar 2017 | #73 | |
Warren DeMontague | Mar 2017 | #79 | |
Calculating | Mar 2017 | #48 | |
tenderfoot | Mar 2017 | #49 | |
Kingofalldems | Mar 2017 | #69 | |
VOX | Mar 2017 | #65 | |
lpbk2713 | Mar 2017 | #70 | |
Oneironaut | Mar 2017 | #71 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Mar 2017 | #75 | |
Afromania | Mar 2017 | #78 | |
briv1016 | Mar 2017 | #80 |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:26 PM
Jim__ (13,421 posts)
1. Kim Jong-Un is crazier than Donald J Trump!
Response to Jim__ (Reply #1)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:28 PM
rzemanfl (29,073 posts)
2. But not bigly crazier. n/t
Response to Jim__ (Reply #1)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 02:01 PM
KingCharlemagne (7,908 posts)
76. On what do you base that? - nt
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:30 PM
TheFrenchRazor (2,116 posts)
3. hmmm..... this appears to be going well.... nt
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:31 PM
Buns_of_Fire (15,568 posts)
4. Two batshit-crazy fools wagging their willies at each other.
While the rest of the world backs slowly... slowly... towards the door.
|
Response to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #4)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:23 PM
Kimchijeon (1,606 posts)
12. I don't want to live on this planet anymore 😨
Response to Kimchijeon (Reply #12)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:17 PM
Eliot Rosewater (29,263 posts)
26. At least we dont have that private server woman, sure there would be world peace
and civil rights and so on, but she had a weird laugh too.
Thank god we dodged that bullet, eh! Sure glad those 3rd party voters voted 3rd party, who wants peace! |
Response to Kimchijeon (Reply #12)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 02:03 PM
KingCharlemagne (7,908 posts)
77. Nothing new under the sun:
Response to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #4)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:25 PM
gratuitous (78,373 posts)
13. That's my take on it
Meanwhile, Peggy Lee is off to the side, crooning "Is That All There Is?"
|
Response to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #4)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:50 PM
marybourg (11,191 posts)
33. Trouble is--there IS no door! nt
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:32 PM
KewlKat (5,293 posts)
5. two dudes with micropenis envy
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:33 PM
Turbineguy (34,631 posts)
6. Easy there big fellah!
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:34 PM
BSdetect (8,663 posts)
7. does drumph have another secret plan perhaps?
If Iranian sailors are a threat with their verbal insults surely this is much more serious?
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:35 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
8. Like to shove a nuke up his a$$.
I really have a problem being threatened with nukes.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #8)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:46 PM
EX500rider (8,118 posts)
9. It's like a Chihuahua growling at a German Shepard K9..
....he can try something but it won't end well.
North Korea: a few crude nukes, none tested for launch reliability/hi G's/atmospheric reentry, etc USA: Current strategic arsenal:1,900-methods of delivery including ICBMs, bombers, and including MIRVed warheads on SLBMs |
Response to EX500rider (Reply #9)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:02 PM
A HERETIC I AM (22,970 posts)
67. I asked if a man in a position to know about our nuclear missiles...
And told him I had heard that not only is the guidance system and targeting capability of a top tier missile of ours capable of hitting a 55 gallon drum from 4000 miles away, it can be so accurately detonated as to do so between the rings of said 55 gallon drum.
His response ? "Absolutely " |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #8)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:32 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
15. You are willing to kill millions of people because their leader made an idle threat?
You know if we nuked North Korea we would become pariahs?
|
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #15)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:47 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
19. Yep....
If we cant get any improvement either thru CHINA or with direct talks and he continues unabated towards a ICBM then acting at that point will be 10x better than waiting 5 years when things will be even worse.
And btw I'm saying take them out with CONVENTIONAL weapons. |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #19)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:52 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
20. What if they nuke Seoul or Tokyo in retaliation?
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #20)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:58 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
21. Most experts dont believe they have weaponized nukes... yet.
And in 5 years they probably will.
Then SK ,Japan and US are screwed. Look, I hope China or direct talks will work but I highly doubt it. |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #21)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:59 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
22. My buddy is an ESL teacher in Bucheon
If the threat is imminent Trump should go to the U N.
|
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #22)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:03 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
23. For their approval ?
Not move unless the UN gives its blessing ?
Really ? |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #23)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:07 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
24. If we attack a sovereign nation that hasn't attacked us or anybody it's a war crime.
Should Israel attack Iran ?
Iran has threatened to erase them from the map. |
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #24)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:13 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
25. I'm no expert on International Law..I take your word.
Well, I stand by my belief that degrading or taking out his weapons before he gets weaponized nukes, if all else fails, would be necessary.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #25)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:18 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
27. I am not an expert either, but it takes more than a threat to justify force.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #27)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:22 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
28. Ok...we agree to disagree.
I hope you're right.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #28)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:05 PM
LanternWaste (37,748 posts)
68. More accurately, "disagree to agree..."
More accurately, "disagree to agree..." and is better served by replacement-- the phrase (or variant) "modus vivendi."
|
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #27)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:44 PM
lunasun (21,646 posts)
57. Thank you DSB . I can't even..
Response to lunasun (Reply #57)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:46 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
59. If Kim attacks South Korea or Japan we are treaty bound to come to their aide and will do so.
But in the absence of an attack we will be in willful violation of international law.
|
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #59)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:51 PM
lunasun (21,646 posts)
62. Yes , I for one understand that .
Response to lunasun (Reply #62)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:57 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
66. We would invoke Article 51 of the U N Charter like we did when his dad attacked South Korea
Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security. |
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #15)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:29 PM
yeoman6987 (14,449 posts)
51. I can't imagine a single country that wouldn't be happy to get rid of that creep
If we protected ourselves, countries would be on our side. If we were not provoked that might be a different story.
|
Response to yeoman6987 (Reply #51)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:33 PM
Kingofalldems (35,989 posts)
52. So you would be okay with a nuke of North Korea, yeoman6987?
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #52)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:44 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
58. Have we lost our collective minds?
A pre-emptive strike ?
If he attacks one of his neighbors then we respond militarily and the whole world or most of it will support us. |
Response to yeoman6987 (Reply #51)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:35 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
53. Where is the provocation?
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #53)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:37 PM
yeoman6987 (14,449 posts)
55. Every time a bomb leaves the North Korean airspace is a provocation
Sorry but that guy is dangerous and how he treats his people is worse.
|
Response to yeoman6987 (Reply #55)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:42 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
56. That is exactly what they said about Saddam.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #56)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:47 PM
yeoman6987 (14,449 posts)
60. The problem with Iraq is we had no plan
We should have been in and out in a week. Destroy the bombing building and get out of there.
|
Response to yeoman6987 (Reply #55)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:54 PM
Kingofalldems (35,989 posts)
64. So you want war with North Korea I take it, yeoman6987?
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #8)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:34 PM
Iggo (45,840 posts)
29. Used to bother me, too...
...back in the sixties.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:55 PM
Denzil_DC (5,957 posts)
10. If this had happened when Obama was president,
Trump would have been burning up Twitter about how weak he was and how something (probably something epicly idiotic) needed to be done NOW. Sad.
I'm hoping some cool heads have survived at some level of the US government who can figure out some way that the Trump administration's current apparent total inactivity about NK doesn't lead to a horrible kneejerk disaster. |
Response to Denzil_DC (Reply #10)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:48 PM
former9thward (26,938 posts)
32. It did happen during the Obama administration.
N. Korea routinely threatened nuclear destruction on the U.S. when something wasn't going their way.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #32)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:51 PM
Denzil_DC (5,957 posts)
34. The North Korean government threatened a bunch of things.
It hadn't made many meaningful strides in developing its missile technology at the time, so such threats weren't credible.
|
Response to Denzil_DC (Reply #34)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:59 PM
former9thward (26,938 posts)
35. You don't need a missile to deliver a nuke.
Which is why Clinton should have stopped the threat, Bush should have stopped the threat, and Obama should have stopped the threat. It will only get worse and not end well so deal with it now.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #35)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 08:04 PM
Denzil_DC (5,957 posts)
36. So what's your solution? n/t
Response to Denzil_DC (Reply #36)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 10:10 PM
former9thward (26,938 posts)
42. Take out their nuclear sites with conventional weapons.
Take out their political leaders with the same.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #35)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 08:32 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
40. I agree wholeheartedly.
Careful...you'll be called a warmonger.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #32)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 08:21 PM
maryellen99 (3,708 posts)
38. But PBO is a grownup and knew not to take the bait, 45 isn't nt
Response to maryellen99 (Reply #38)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 10:08 PM
former9thward (26,938 posts)
41. So you would like to wait until a few hundred thousand die before acting?
Ok, know where you are coming from...
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #41)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 07:25 AM
maryellen99 (3,708 posts)
43. No I meant acting rashly and attacking for no reason NT
Response to maryellen99 (Reply #43)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:04 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
46. What WOULD it take for you to say ...
"time to act now"
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #46)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:06 PM
maryellen99 (3,708 posts)
47. If he attacked the US and that's it.
Response to maryellen99 (Reply #47)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:23 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
50. Ok....so if he nuked SF or Seattle , its a go.
Hope you don't live there.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #46)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:37 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
54. If he attacked us or an ally.
Then the whole world including China would be behind us.
|
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #54)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:49 PM
Rustyeye77 (2,736 posts)
61. Ok...Dead People AND China's blessing, then its a go.
Sorry.. respectfully, we just disagree.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Reply #61)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:52 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
63. Iran has made similar threats against Israel
Would they be justified in attacking Iran?
What happens if China comes to the defense of North Korea? And we can not subdue them with conventional weapons do we nuke them ? |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:20 PM
derby378 (30,252 posts)
11. Wassa matta, use up all your VX on your half-brother?
I could collapse the economy of a DPRK village with five boxes of Choco Puffs and 10 DVDs of Wreck-It Ralph.
Edited because I'm sometimes an idiot. |
Response to derby378 (Reply #11)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:39 PM
catsudon (710 posts)
16. half brother
but yeah, everything else checks out
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:30 PM
Lurks Often (5,455 posts)
14. Typical noise from North Korea, although I give them credit for overly
dramatic speeches and stories.
|
Response to Lurks Often (Reply #14)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:41 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
18. We would be pariahs if we attack North Korea in the absence of an imminent threat.
It would be like Iraq on steroids.
|
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #18)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:45 PM
Oneironaut (4,266 posts)
72. Agreed. We absolutely cannot attack North Korea openly.
This is a job for the CIA. We need a coup.
|
Response to Oneironaut (Reply #72)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:57 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
74. I have to believe we are trying.
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 06:41 PM
Freethinker65 (7,505 posts)
17. Does shooting himself in the foot count?
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:40 PM
hunter (35,764 posts)
30. That's just his way of saying "my people are hungry."
![]() |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 07:40 PM
dalton99a (70,336 posts)
31. Two idiots yelling at each other
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 08:16 PM
Adrahil (13,340 posts)
37. Two nutjobs playing chicken. What could go wrong?
Though let's be clear.... DPRK is not reducing anyone to ashes.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 08:30 PM
JDC (9,059 posts)
39. Kim Jung-on vs Dim Don-con - an epic battle
Between two dangerously narcissistic loons.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 07:48 AM
Bucky (51,752 posts)
44. Another rebuke of American exceptionalism
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 07:51 AM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
45. Batshit crazy talk is North Korea's only reliable export.
Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #45)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:56 PM
LanternWaste (37,748 posts)
73. Lil Kim... so bat-shit crazy he once...
Lil Kim... so bat-shit crazy he once pretended rape and drunk sex were the same for the lulz.
|
Response to LanternWaste (Reply #73)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 06:25 PM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
79. did he?
I must have missed that one.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:09 PM
Calculating (2,449 posts)
48. NK is led by the purest of evil
Watch this video to learn more about the Kim Regime and their horrific human rights violations/threats to the world.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:13 PM
tenderfoot (7,667 posts)
49. The Sun. Such a credible "news" source
eom
|
Response to tenderfoot (Reply #49)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:09 PM
Kingofalldems (35,989 posts)
69. Trump is desperate for war.
Don't understand this thread being posted on DU.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 12:55 PM
VOX (22,976 posts)
65. Somewhere a tail is itching to wag the dog.
Unfortunately, nukes are involved.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:13 PM
lpbk2713 (41,210 posts)
70. Fat Man and Little Boy
![]() ![]() |
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:41 PM
Oneironaut (4,266 posts)
71. The problem is, MAD is not a deterrent to Kim Jong Un.
He couldn't care less about his own citizens. He would blow them up himself if it meant gaining something from it.
If it meant nuking even one US city to be known as "the one who nuked America," he would do it. The pickle here is, if you attack them now, Seoul will be destroyed, and millions of South Koreans and thousands of Americans will die. On the other hand, if North Korea gets an ICBM, it's like giving a 5 year old a loaded gun with a hair trigger. They will threaten us and try to blackmail us with the threat of a preemptive nuclear attack on US cities. The threats will never stop until a horrific war that kills millions upon millions. War is imminent. It's not a matter of if - it's a matter of where and when, and how we can minimize the destruction it will cause. It's no secret why this is happening now. America is tired of war and weakened. Trump is the world's laughing stock. Kim sees his window of opportunity. He will end up swinging from a tree, but he's going to try and cause as much destruction as possible before his death. Pray for a coup to take this bastard out. It's the only solution that has a good outcome. |
Response to Oneironaut (Reply #71)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:59 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,016 posts)
75. I have read an attack would be our biggest military operation since WW ll
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 02:36 PM
Afromania (2,727 posts)
78. ........
sigh, ah boy.
|
Response to Rustyeye77 (Original post)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 06:34 PM
briv1016 (1,570 posts)
80. Lets just break out a ruler and measure them already. Maybe we can prevent a war.
On second thought, a micrometer may work better.
|