Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,786 posts)
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 12:58 PM Mar 2017

*****BREAKING***** Two White House Officials Gave Nunes Info He Gave To Trump





WASHINGTON — A pair of White House officials played a role in providing Representative Devin Nunes of California, a Republican and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, with the intelligence reports that showed that President Trump and his associates were incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance by American spy agencies.

The revelation that White House officials assisted in the disclosure of the intelligence reports — which Mr. Nunes then discussed with President Trump — is likely to fuel criticism that the intelligence chairman has been too eager to do the bidding of the Trump administration while his committee is supposed to be conducting an independent investigation of Russia’s meddling in the last presidential election.

Mr. Nunes has also been faulted by his congressional colleagues for sharing the information with President Trump before consulting with other members of the intelligence committee.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/us/politics/devin-nunes-intelligence-reports.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&_r=0




I can't even go to freaking Costco and come back home without Trump and his affiliates doing something shady !!!
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*****BREAKING***** Two White House Officials Gave Nunes Info He Gave To Trump (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2017 OP
do they know which 2 staffers? vlyons Mar 2017 #1
This is crazy. Could they do more to inculpate themselves? DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2017 #2
Speaking of Kellyanne Conjob*... Raster Mar 2017 #10
They listed their names OliverQ Mar 2017 #16
So they gave it to Nenuz so he could kacekwl Mar 2017 #28
They probably gave it to Nunez to launder the info OliverQ Mar 2017 #31
NYT has such a nice way of putting things. :)) pangaia Mar 2017 #3
I imagine the staffers cooked the stuff they fed nunes Marthe48 Mar 2017 #4
Thing is, what he was feed was pabulum. Nothing remotely worth noting. Certainly not to hold two KittyWampus Mar 2017 #12
Nunes doesn't strike me as being able to discern Marthe48 Mar 2017 #14
LOL mzteaze Mar 2017 #5
I no longer believe he should recuse himself. Bleacher Creature Mar 2017 #6
This bunch is more incompetent than Nixon's Watergate crooks. procon Mar 2017 #7
The treasonous version radical noodle Mar 2017 #20
I just got back from Costco... Raster Mar 2017 #8
I wonder who is leaking the identity. grantcart Mar 2017 #9
And the information was totally run of the mill, ordinary and not worth noting. So Nunes KittyWampus Mar 2017 #11
all cover for trump...he got to say 'i feel somewhat vindicated' so his loyals will stay loyal. spanone Mar 2017 #15
investigate the investigation...these people are fucking shameless criminals spanone Mar 2017 #13
bet Rachel will be on this tonite triron Mar 2017 #17
This is getting fucking ridiculous triron Mar 2017 #18
I haven't heard any Dem radical noodle Mar 2017 #22
Heitkamp just did. Statement announced she'd vote to approve. calimary Mar 2017 #24
That's disappointing at the very least radical noodle Mar 2017 #25
Nunes flat out lied when he said no WH staff even knew he was at the WH secure room looking at docs. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #19
Now we're cookin' Blue_Tires Mar 2017 #21
and, the two White House officials NewJeffCT Mar 2017 #23
K and R...nt Stuart G Mar 2017 #26
I would be interested in what information Michael Ellis passed on to the White House Tanuki Mar 2017 #27
I really don't get the point in this. So Nunes goes to the White House grounds where 2 White House Vinca Mar 2017 #29
It was pretty obvious this was cooked up by the White House when a Trump supporting PAC tanyev Mar 2017 #30

Raster

(21,010 posts)
10. Speaking of Kellyanne Conjob*...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:23 PM
Mar 2017

...she seems to have fallen through the slime and back down into the ooze... I wonder where --AND WHAT-- she's been hiding?

 

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)
16. They listed their names
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:35 PM
Mar 2017

Ezra Cohen, Flynn's former aide who Trump refused to allow to leave at McMaster's demand. And Michael Ellis.

kacekwl

(9,064 posts)
28. So they gave it to Nenuz so he could
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 04:44 PM
Mar 2017

get the info out right ? Trump knew what they gave him ? Just trying to follow along.

 

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)
31. They probably gave it to Nunez to launder the info
Fri Mar 31, 2017, 10:12 AM
Mar 2017

So no one would supposedly know where it came from. It makes no sense since the NSC guys could have just handed it directly to Trump down the hall.

Trump probably knew about it ahead of time, which indicates he was involved with orchestrating this charade to try and "vindicate" his stupid "Obama wiretapped me" tweet.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
12. Thing is, what he was feed was pabulum. Nothing remotely worth noting. Certainly not to hold two
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:26 PM
Mar 2017

breathless pressers.

Marthe48

(23,000 posts)
14. Nunes doesn't strike me as being able to discern
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:30 PM
Mar 2017

wheat from chaff. Anything new gets a presser, no matter how little it matters. tweet, tweet

mzteaze

(448 posts)
5. LOL
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:09 PM
Mar 2017

LOL surprise surprise....it's two people they wanted to get rid of...

the new guy, Michael Ellis - connected to Nunes who just started on 3/7

and the guy connected to FLYNN - Ezra Cohen-Watnick.

You would have to be crazy to want to work for this administration. "You, too, could be the next scapegoat [for de Thrumpfurer]" is not what they tell you at the interview.

Bleacher Creature

(11,504 posts)
6. I no longer believe he should recuse himself.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:09 PM
Mar 2017

Because I now believe that there's enough evidence to call on him to RESIGN from Congress altogether.

procon

(15,805 posts)
7. This bunch is more incompetent than Nixon's Watergate crooks.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:09 PM
Mar 2017

They're like a pratfall comedy act, or an SNL skit, they're the classic bumbling Keystone Kops, and the blooper outtakes from an episode of the World's Dumbest Criminals. Its like they deliberately dropped a map and a To-Do-List at the scene of the crime, then left a trail of breadcrumbs and put up flashing neon arrows pointing to photos of everyone involved.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
11. And the information was totally run of the mill, ordinary and not worth noting. So Nunes
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:25 PM
Mar 2017

is a lying weasel who held two pressers after seeing something that said "water is wet".

spanone

(141,335 posts)
15. all cover for trump...he got to say 'i feel somewhat vindicated' so his loyals will stay loyal.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:32 PM
Mar 2017

spanone

(141,335 posts)
13. investigate the investigation...these people are fucking shameless criminals
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:30 PM
Mar 2017

isn't corrupting a government investigation illegal?

i know it would be if nunes was a democrat.

 

triron

(22,240 posts)
18. This is getting fucking ridiculous
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 01:41 PM
Mar 2017

but yet still some of the dem senators aren't willing to block Gorsuch. Seems spineless to me.

radical noodle

(10,553 posts)
22. I haven't heard any Dem
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 02:36 PM
Mar 2017

say they would vote yes on Gorsuch. I think even Manchin has said he's voting no.

radical noodle

(10,553 posts)
25. That's disappointing at the very least
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 04:23 PM
Mar 2017

I'm surprised. She must have a lot of red voters calling her.

NewJeffCT

(56,848 posts)
23. and, the two White House officials
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 03:15 PM
Mar 2017

got it from Trump, who got it from Breitbart who got it from RT who got it from the FSB...

Tanuki

(16,398 posts)
27. I would be interested in what information Michael Ellis passed on to the White House
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 04:32 PM
Mar 2017

that he obtained in his immediately prior role as General Counsel to Nunes' committee. I hope he is disbarred or even imprisoned over this.

Vinca

(53,729 posts)
29. I really don't get the point in this. So Nunes goes to the White House grounds where 2 White House
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 04:49 PM
Mar 2017

employees have him listen to some secret something or other that apparently indicates Trump was picked up in incidental surveillance. Nunes then scoots back to consult with Paul Ryan, then heads back to the White House to tell Trump. Trump must have already known this because if he didn't those employees would be gone by now. How does running this bit of information through a dairy farmer make it more legitimate? And "incidental" doesn't mean innocent. Someone might be asking how much loot to send to Trump's Cayman Island account this week. It makes no sense to me.

tanyev

(49,053 posts)
30. It was pretty obvious this was cooked up by the White House when a Trump supporting PAC
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 05:40 PM
Mar 2017

tweeted out a fundraising letter moments after Nunes' press conference. What I want to know is, who was the reporter who fed Donnie the question about whether he felt vindicated? I still think that was the #1 purpose of the whole fiasco.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*****BREAKING***** Two Wh...