General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBritish, English, Scottish - Who do you think you are?
Britishness has been successfully promoted as an open identity that is multi-cultural and multi-ethnic - but it is important to ask why people from ethnic minorities almost never describe themselves as English. It is still perceived as an ethnic identity.
Labour leader Ed Miliband touched on this in a recent speech when he said: "We were too nervous to talk of English pride and English character. Connecting it to the kind of nationalism that left us ill at ease."
North of the border, Scottishness trumps Britishness, even among ethnic minorities.
He did not say it so bluntly, but Mr Miliband's concern is that for too long English national identity has remained the preserve of racists.
The debate is different in Scotland where British identity is much weaker than in other parts of the UK.
Questions of identity
Professor John Curtice, from Strathclyde University, told Channel 4 News: "In Scotland, Scottishness has been sold as a multi-cultural identity and it does not have the same association with xenophobia as Englishness."
Prof John Curtice
Scotland's most prominent Asian MSP, Humza Yousaf, says that questions of identity have become more fluid and unrestricted -
"Take my own example. As an Asian Scot born in Glasgow to a father from Pakistan and a mother from Kenya, I went on to marry my wife, Gail, who is a white Scot born in England to an English father and Scottish mother.
He adds: "I would challenge anyone to accurately define the identity of any children we may have in the future. Will they be a quarter Scottish, a quarter Pakistani, a quarter English?
http://www.channel4.com/news/british-english-scottish-who-do-you-think-you-are
https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/2012/06/30/ethnic-minorities-living-in-the-uk-feel-more-british-than-white-britons
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)In an article for The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Cameron said that for the first time the two words Europe and referendum can go together. His comments appeared to signal a step-change in the Conservatives attitude to Europe, after 100 MPs urged him to create a new relationship with Brussels.
Many Eurosceptic MPs were not satisfied, urging Mr Cameron to make a commitment to a referendum on leaving the European Union before 2015. Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Business Secretary, called the idea horribly irrelevant.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/9368838/Cameron-to-face-rebellion-over-EU-plans.html
The tone of the Torys has changed since Cameron came back from Brussels?
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)As most off it is irrelevant. Unless on "reserved matters". I personally not see a problem with Europe as a rule, but British sovereignist do. It sometimes makes sense to share sovereignty on shared issues. That can still be done within each parliament. The improvement and collective protection of Human rights being a worthy issue to pursuit across the EU.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)on whether to use £'s or 's.
No - I don't know how to find Euros on the keyboard - I cut and pasted that symbol.
ikri
(1,127 posts)On most UK keyboards (assuming you use Windows, if you're on a Mac you're on your own)
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)and nothing happened.
Then I tried ctrl alt 4 and it worked
Thank you.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It is a "patriotic" magazine that comes out quarterly "for all who love our green and pleasant land."
It is full of pretty pictures of the English countryside, villages, castles and what not, with the occasional fiction, first person or "as told to" articles about events or people in recent history.... and the occasional racist editorial rant about how much better things were in the "good old days." It is very well written, though, so the racism goes down with a spoonful of sugar! It's in there, though--and rather jarring to come across after having read some smarmy, nostalgic and sentimental tale about some topic that is entirely suitable for "the family hour."
http://www.thisengland.co.uk/single.htm?ipg=10677
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)What the article (OP) left out, was a side of British Nationalism that isn't too pretty either. i.e. Orange order.
MADem
(135,425 posts)society. A neighbor gets the mags here as well and will toss me an odd one on occasion.
That magazine is a real charmer, until it isn't, if you know what I mean! If they'd leave the politics out of it, they'd probably do better and boost their readership if they didn't have that unfortunate racist, anti-immigrant tinge. It's not all over the magazine, it's just found in the little commentary section at the center--and it's always more than a bit off-putting!
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)I hope they spread the stuff the increases the blood pressure with lovely pictures of the English countryside.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,491 posts)This earth of Majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise;
This fortress built by Nature for herself,
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands;
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
This nurse, this teeming womb of royal kings,
Fear'd by their breed, and famous by their birth.
John of Gaunt, Scene I
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Richard_II_%28play%29
Rather chauvinistic. The magazine has been around for some time (1968, looking it up on Wikipedia - and owned since 2009 by DC Thomson of Dundee!) All the pictures of the countryside look harmless, and the nostalgia looks it too - until it tips into a diatribe on how Europeans are ruining everything. Wikipedia says DC Thomson is cleaning it up a bit.
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)Any more than the Scottish Daily Records owner being Trinity Mirror of London or the Scottish Sun another English-based tabloid.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)HipChick
(25,575 posts)MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)yewberry
(6,530 posts)they do feel like different terms to me. 'British' feels much more geopolitical, while 'English' seems to be an ethnic identity. Maybe it's the association with 'Empire.'
But then, what do I know? I consider myself a Scot!
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)By being European. In other words. I'm Scottish and European. I'm an ethnic Scot that sees all Scots, as Scots regardless of ethnicity. Identity is a personal thing and many people can and do have complex identities.
mr blur
(7,753 posts)I'm English and European
yewberry
(6,530 posts)I completely understand being an ethnic Scot seeing all Scots as Scots regardless of ethnicity.
However, I'm an ethnic Scot in the US, so almost by definition, here, being a Scot means being an ethnic Scot.
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)Most Americans that view themselves as Scots tend to have surnames linked to the clanns. But ultimately its open to all.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)And yes, the clan name connections do get tied up with feelings of identity and feelings of belonging.