Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 07:56 PM Jul 2012

Philadelphia Mayor Apparently Wants Occupy National Gathering Participants to Go Thirsty in Heat

http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/07/01/philadelphia-mayor-wants-occupy-national-gathering-participants-to-go-thirsty-in-heat/

Philadelphia Mayor Wants Occupy National Gathering Participants to Go Thirsty in Heat

By: Kevin Gosztola Sunday July 1, 2012 4:26 pm

Record-breaking heat has been sweeping the United States. The Occupy movement is holding a major National Gathering in Philadelphia right now, where the temperature has reached ninety-five degrees Fahrenheit. Anyone spending hours out in this weather needs to drink water so as not to pass out from heat exhaustion. But Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, a Democrat, has issued orders instructing city departments and other organizations in the city to not give water to occupiers.

Occupiers intended to be able to get water from a fire station nearby where the Gathering has been taking place (right downtown around Independence Mall). When occupiers went to get water for participants who would be at today’s activities, a firefighter said the department could not give occupiers water. A direct order had been given from Nutter to not provide water to occupiers.

A person who is out in heat for a long period can get an illness. In extreme cases, people can die. The most serious illness, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), is heat stroke. One of the factors that can contribute to the cause of these heat-induced illnesses is “low liquid intake” or lack of water. It is highly encouraged that people drink water “every fifteen minutes.”

This order is a clear example of repression. A Democratic mayor does not want to be seen as encouraging the Occupy movement. He would like to make sure none of his precious campaign donors in the city get wind of city employees like firefighters helping people stay well throughout the Gathering. Ordering firefighters to not give out water may keep the numbers low. Having police not let people have water to distribute can keep numbers low, too. The mayor would rather have occupiers pass out and go to the hospital with serious heat illnesses than risk being seen as too sympathetic to this movement for economic equality and justice.

MORE AT LINK

I haven't found confirmation of this personally:

pHink a. saurus ?@pHinkasaurus
#wtf MT @OccupyFreedomLA @occupyng confirmed via twitter that Philly mayor asked Quakers not to give protesters water
233 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Philadelphia Mayor Apparently Wants Occupy National Gathering Participants to Go Thirsty in Heat (Original Post) Hissyspit Jul 2012 OP
Damn Republicans just have no soul... Fumesucker Jul 2012 #1
Democratic mayors are behind some of the worst violence against Occupy so it's equal opportunity. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #2
Don't forget Rahm in Chicago. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #11
I try to ;) Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #15
It's as if they think they'll lose to the 'Pugs Ken Burch Jul 2012 #24
It's a Democratic mayor who issued the order. . . Journeyman Jul 2012 #3
Gogol's "dead souls" ananda Jul 2012 #14
You did see that this was a Democrat, right? SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #6
Eh, we vote for Democrats because they don't do things like this.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #17
Someone who assumes that a municipal government run by the Democratic Party Ken Burch Jul 2012 #25
Or someone with a well nigh overwhelming urge to snark.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #31
Point taken. Ken Burch Jul 2012 #40
The Occupiers are not stupid and not naive SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #32
It does reveal the depth to which they will all sink in order to attempt to hurt the movement. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #59
"basic general public services"? PavePusher Jul 2012 #115
"Let them die" is a Libertarian position. I'm not getting this at all. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #153
Stop. Just stop. n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #166
Don't forget Wilson Goode, Dem and Philly Mayor in 1985 when coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #220
Philadelphia's mayor is a Democrat madashelltoo Jul 2012 #19
I read the OP, was being snarky.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author former9thward Jul 2012 #23
What is the link? EFerrari Jul 2012 #4
Fixed. Hissyspit Jul 2012 #8
Thank you. You know, the problem with coordinating crowd control EFerrari Jul 2012 #16
Philadelphia Mayor Wants Occupy National Gathering Participants to Go Thirsty in Heat Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #9
Utterly ignoring the area's revolutionary history. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #5
He's a zero... PCIntern Jul 2012 #7
Nutter is only a Democrat because everyone here is a Democrat. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #10
I have read a lot about 'Nutter' even before OWS sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #12
Then you remember, PCIntern Jul 2012 #22
The MOVE bomb makes Goode much worse in my book bluestateguy Jul 2012 #33
Philly politics have always been ugly. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #82
+1 Blue_Tires Jul 2012 #90
When republicans cant get elected in democrat dominated areas... Larry Ogg Jul 2012 #41
Yes. In this bizzarro world I'm considering running as a Republican. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #81
In reading your comment, and then your sig line..., Larry Ogg Jul 2012 #85
On the positive side, Chris Hedges has been speaking :) Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #13
And there are such things as bottled water for the time being. freshwest Jul 2012 #208
"He would like to make sure none of his precious campaign donors" BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #18
Well the lawsuit should be fun nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #20
asked about denying water to the protesters in dangerously oppressive heat: "Just following orders." Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #26
The Occupiers are pretty naive to depend on the Establishment to support them. bluedigger Jul 2012 #27
Do we know that they didn't? EFerrari Jul 2012 #39
What are you implying? bluedigger Jul 2012 #50
It's the proactive refusal that bothers most people, I think. Occulus Jul 2012 #55
Do you know what Occupy planned? EFerrari Jul 2012 #58
I have no idea - do you? bluedigger Jul 2012 #69
Well, I've watched dozens of these big protests and the only time EFerrari Jul 2012 #71
And that's their problem. bluedigger Jul 2012 #74
No, that's your assumption which as far as we know hasn't been verified. EFerrari Jul 2012 #75
What assumption? bluedigger Jul 2012 #77
You are assuming Occupy didn't have its own water supply. EFerrari Jul 2012 #78
It's sad that in this day of global mass media it is certain 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #105
It's pretty clear from the linked article that they didn't plan on having their own water supply SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #108
I don't know. I asked Kevin Gosztola and @tigerbeat EFerrari Jul 2012 #127
Precisely. MADem Jul 2012 #79
Maybe that's the point? Hissyspit Jul 2012 #52
How deliciously amoral of you. - n/t coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #225
To understand something is not to endorse it. n/t bluedigger Jul 2012 #228
Oh, but you do endorse it with your phrase 'good tactics' and coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #229
Protesters and media being kettled, arrested Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #28
ALERT:There is no video from #NATGAT MASS ARREST. All streamers have been arrested. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #35
One livestream still up: Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #38
And now punkboy is streaming jail support. EFerrari Jul 2012 #56
Thanks! Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #67
These Occupiers are too stupid to live Demeter Jul 2012 #29
Hi there. I'm an Occupier. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #34
Yes, tooo stoooopid GarroHorus Jul 2012 #46
You have no idea what you're talking about. EFerrari Jul 2012 #51
Occupiers creating an "emergency" where none exists GarroHorus Jul 2012 #61
You are criticizing a situation you have no knowledge or understanding of EFerrari Jul 2012 #63
Occupiers are creating an "emergency:" where none exists and you have no knowledge.. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #65
Emergency care would be a general public service SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #104
Can you imagine protesters milling around outside the fire station while getting water? randome Jul 2012 #110
Obviously then, water is something which needs to be free. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #139
You're right, it's a basic human need SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #141
If you're sick of the 1%, how about being sick of the(ir) concept of paying for water. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #142
Being sick of the 1% doesn't mean that the Occupiers don't have to exercise some responsiblity SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #145
I think horizontalism must be the way to go, if everyone is okay with people dying from heat. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #148
Quick question, yes or no SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #150
Quick question, yes or no, do we care for our brothers and sisters in dire need? Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #158
Then I take it that yes or no are not in your vocabulary? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #162
Taking care of people in need is. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #174
Dodge. PavePusher Jul 2012 #168
I will not step into your distractions. Take care of people in need, period. End of story. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #173
Why do you think they can not take care of themselves? PavePusher Jul 2012 #178
Why didn't some of the Occupiers care enough about their fellow protesters SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #209
Occupy organizers are providing water to participants in Philly, per I text I just received. yardwork Jul 2012 #211
That's good news! SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #213
Maybe they did have water stations yesterday, too. It doesn't negate the mayor's behavior. yardwork Jul 2012 #214
Yes, both things can be true at the same time SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #215
Your contempt for the Occupy movement is odd considering your posting name. yardwork Jul 2012 #216
I don't have contempt for them at all SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #219
Since when did the fire department Meiko Jul 2012 #124
"Ron Paul: No Federal Financial Aid for Tornado Victims" Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #133
Obviously water is something which needs to be free. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #138
Water IS free. Go get some. randome Jul 2012 #140
Yeah, so stupid to expect public servants to serve the public. EFerrari Jul 2012 #37
So a fire station gives out all its water during a drought to Occupiers and then a fire happens. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #47
Have you read your own posts lately? EFerrari Jul 2012 #49
Have you? GarroHorus Jul 2012 #62
"Expect public servants to serve the public"? What country do you think this is? Zalatix Jul 2012 #84
I would be willing to bet that 9 out of 10 people reading this..... NCTraveler Jul 2012 #100
Stupid is as stupid does. PavePusher Jul 2012 #116
"...evolution in action" is a Larry Niven line, and he's a die-hard Ronald Reagan fan. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #136
What, you don't believe in evolution? n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #152
Odd you are not alarmed to find yourself quoting a staunch Republican Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #154
Once in a while those assholes are right. PavePusher Jul 2012 #169
Let them die, dog eat dog. That's quite a philosophy you have there. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #171
You've ascribed a position to me that I do not hold. PavePusher Jul 2012 #175
Seriously? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #57
Evidently extremely seriously if you look downthread. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #177
The establishment doesn't care about little people, let's protest! 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #91
I'm with you on this one Demeter. Puzzledtraveller Jul 2012 #121
Welcome to my Ignore list - n/t coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #226
here an issue Democratic and Republican leaders can joelz Jul 2012 #30
this country is divided by the humane and the inhumane. spanone Jul 2012 #36
Philadelphia Police Civil Affairs - 215-685-3685 Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #42
Report: all the live streamers have been arrested EFerrari Jul 2012 #43
There is a reason I am registered as "unaffiliated". Dawson Leery Jul 2012 #68
Children's Crusade From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Demeter Jul 2012 #44
No time for sermons, we're busy doing things. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #53
Piss poor planning on the part of Occupy planners. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #45
30 Occupiers and 2 streamers arrested. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #48
DHS on the scene, our taxes at work: EFerrari Jul 2012 #54
Unless arrangements were made ahead of time nobodyspecial Jul 2012 #60
Deny to one, deny to all. Period. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #66
It's more likely that they were cut off from their own stuff somehow. EFerrari Jul 2012 #72
give me some evidence/facts on this claim and i'll listen, until then i'll agree with poor planning. Bodhi BloodWave Jul 2012 #87
It doesn't work that way nobodyspecial Jul 2012 #89
You go right ahead. EFerrari Jul 2012 #128
In this case it looks like they were just expecting the fire department to 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #93
Livestream recorded archive of what cops did yesterday in the park: Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #64
If this had been done to a Tealiban gathering Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #70
Here is the recording of cops kettling the protesters with bicycles: Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #73
What? They didn't bring water to the revolution? And these are folks we're relying on..... Tarheel_Dem Jul 2012 #76
Just bring their own water treestar Jul 2012 #80
Agreed. HappyMe Jul 2012 #86
Where can I donate money for water? Zalatix Jul 2012 #83
Why can't the protesters Meiko Jul 2012 #88
I'm sorry, what was that? 'Organizers'? What does that word mean? randome Jul 2012 #98
who ever puts the protests together Meiko Jul 2012 #120
Absolutely. An 'organic' and 'leaderless' movement is destined to flounder. randome Jul 2012 #137
"The organizers of these protests are a very sharp group of people" NCTraveler Jul 2012 #101
It would seem so Meiko Jul 2012 #122
Oh, I think they're slightly sharper than you think ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #129
True... NCTraveler Jul 2012 #191
It also makes them look like martyrs... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #221
Sounds like a case of poor planning slackmaster Jul 2012 #92
Only mad dogs and englishment go out in the midday sun 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #94
Is there a possible lawsuit against this mayor.. 99Forever Jul 2012 #95
"if a citizen becomes seriously ill " NCTraveler Jul 2012 #102
Is this your judicial opinion as an actual judge? 99Forever Jul 2012 #112
"I can't say for sure" NCTraveler Jul 2012 #117
Firestations are public property. HappyMe Jul 2012 #106
See my response to your fellow skeptic. n/t 99Forever Jul 2012 #113
Still ridiculous, sorry. HappyMe Jul 2012 #123
I know dood or doodette. 99Forever Jul 2012 #126
Since when is it a firefighter's job to provide water to HappyMe Jul 2012 #130
So it seems you are defending the 1%... 99Forever Jul 2012 #131
What? HappyMe Jul 2012 #134
You can either explain your defense of the 1% or.. 99Forever Jul 2012 #151
Fine, assume away. HappyMe Jul 2012 #155
a true friend would tell said friend when they are acting in an idiotic manner Bodhi BloodWave Jul 2012 #203
Who's "defending" the 1%? PavePusher Jul 2012 #218
If only Occupy read DU... SidDithers Jul 2012 #96
It's rather brutal to see people on DU cheering on the misery of the occupiers or any other human myrna minx Jul 2012 #97
No one wants anyone to be miserable. (Well, for the vast majority of us, maybe.) randome Jul 2012 #99
I think it's more "they created problems for themselves" 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #103
That's a Libertarian position, isn't it? They should have known better so let them suffer/die? Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #183
Not really 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #188
I agree 1000% 99Forever Jul 2012 #114
Really? I can only dimly imagine the glee here... PavePusher Jul 2012 #119
"Let them die" is a Libertarian stance. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #132
Seriously, who said anything about "Let them die"? PavePusher Jul 2012 #156
The conditions have already been stated as ripe for heat stroke and death. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #160
If you don't see a difference between a tornado and carrying a bottle or two of water.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #165
I fear for the future of the world when people can't see allowing Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #172
I fear a future where adults are too stupid or lazy to supply the most basic survival need. Throd Jul 2012 #187
Agreed... richmwill Jul 2012 #157
Don't forget coats in the winter 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #190
I can't believe people wouldn't go out in the heat without anything to drink.. snooper2 Jul 2012 #118
How much would it cost to rent a large water tank and trailer 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #192
Occupy has water stations in Philly this week. They are not unprepared. yardwork Jul 2012 #195
So . . . what's the problem then? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #196
I'm reporting a text I just received from somebody who is in Philly at Occupy. yardwork Jul 2012 #198
Seems like drummed up controversy then 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #205
Well, then what HappyMe Jul 2012 #197
It sounds like two things are true. One, the fire station did refuse water. yardwork Jul 2012 #200
Someone was fear mongering. PavePusher Jul 2012 #202
I don't know that is fear mongering. The news reports are true, apparently. yardwork Jul 2012 #212
It is not the Mayor's job, nor the city's obligation.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #217
I am seriously considering leaving DU for good because of it. This coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #227
This thread is horrifying. Welcome to Ron Paul Underground. myrna minx Jul 2012 #231
Air drop? n/t Ian David Jul 2012 #107
By automated drones. randome Jul 2012 #109
I hope the Quakers stand up to their usual standards. They have been on the right side of the jwirr Jul 2012 #111
Don't stop Remember Jul 2012 #125
One aspect of Occupy is that the illusion of scarcity is only an illusion. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #135
No other animal on Earth pays for water. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #143
No other animal Meiko Jul 2012 #144
My point is freedom vs. Capitalism. Obviously, capitalism and its proponents are OK when people die. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #146
"Why do we pay for something that is a =natural= resource?" PavePusher Jul 2012 #159
Perhaps even reality nobodyspecial Jul 2012 #167
Well, yeah, but I figured I'd keep it narrow.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #170
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Jul 2012 #179
I think I was being rather civil nobodyspecial Jul 2012 #189
Umm... no other animal filters out impurities and organisms nobodyspecial Jul 2012 #147
Seriously? You do not imagine that I am aware of our systems of storage and filtration and Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #149
No-one has "decreed" any such fucking thing. PavePusher Jul 2012 #161
A post on brotherly love gets this response? Thank you and goodbye. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #176
A post on "brotherly love" would not be based on a lie. PavePusher Jul 2012 #185
The mean spirit runs deep in .. 99Forever Jul 2012 #201
And stupid people die B2G Jul 2012 #206
I regularly hear almost exactly the same sentiment from.. 99Forever Jul 2012 #223
Mean people are in pain. May they find love and healing now. :( Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #210
How many protestors died yesterday? B2G Jul 2012 #164
135 Throd Jul 2012 #180
If only they'd chanted... B2G Jul 2012 #184
I'm so going to hell.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #186
Oh! HappyMe Jul 2012 #194
"Nothing has happened yet so everything is okay?" Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #181
This post made me lol B2G Jul 2012 #163
No other animal on earth gets to use the city water supply 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #193
I just texted with somebody at Occupy in Philly. yardwork Jul 2012 #182
What a humanitarian. Did he offer them cake as a substitute? Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2012 #199
Should the city also give them cheese steaks? Freddie Stubbs Jul 2012 #204
It's Philly! Of course! randome Jul 2012 #207
occupy. -eom Huey P. Long Jul 2012 #222
June 30: Man hit in the throat with baton at Occupy Philadelphia #NatGat: Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #224
Break their unions. Dawson Leery Jul 2012 #232
Or..... PavePusher Jul 2012 #233
Thank you for posting this. It's at times like this that coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #230

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
1. Damn Republicans just have no soul...
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 07:58 PM
Jul 2012

I bet they'd let a Tea Party gathering have all the water they want..

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
2. Democratic mayors are behind some of the worst violence against Occupy so it's equal opportunity.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 08:01 PM
Jul 2012

Quan in Oakland...Seattle, Denver, LA...

The system doesn't like being challenged.

Journeyman

(15,031 posts)
3. It's a Democratic mayor who issued the order. . .
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 08:02 PM
Jul 2012

As Nikolai Gogol might point out, there are "Dead Souls" enough for all . . .

ananda

(28,858 posts)
14. Gogol's "dead souls"
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 08:24 PM
Jul 2012

From Wiki:

In the Russian Empire, before the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, landowners were entitled to own serfs to farm their land. Serfs were for most purposes considered the property of the landowner, and could be bought, sold or mortgaged, as any other chattel. To count serfs (and people in general), the measure word "soul" was used: e.g., "six souls of serfs". The plot of the novel relies on "dead souls" (i.e., "dead serfs&quot which are still accounted for in property registers. On another level, the title refers to the "dead souls" of Gogol's characters, all of which visualise different aspects of poshlost (an untranslatable Russian word which is perhaps best rendered as "self-satisfied inferiority", moral and spiritual, with overtones of middle-class pretentiousness, fake significance and philistinism).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Souls

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
6. You did see that this was a Democrat, right?
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 08:04 PM
Jul 2012

And who organizes a gathering in sweltering heat with planning to provide water?

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
25. Someone who assumes that a municipal government run by the Democratic Party
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 09:56 PM
Jul 2012

could be trusted to have humane, civilized values.

Instead, this Philly mayor is honoring the memory of one his more, er, memorable predecessors:



Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
31. Or someone with a well nigh overwhelming urge to snark..
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:23 PM
Jul 2012

Which often does come off sounding a bit naive/ignorant if taken literally.

But thank you for trying to think the best of me..





SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
32. The Occupiers are not stupid and not naive
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:25 PM
Jul 2012

They know, or should know, that few municipal governments, regardless of party, are going to do anything to help them or make their lives easier. This point was demonstrated time and time again last year and earlier this year.

Assuming that any mayor, unless he or she has publicly stated support for the movement, is going to do anything to help them, including keeping them hydrated in scorching weather, is not smart, IMO.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
59. It does reveal the depth to which they will all sink in order to attempt to hurt the movement.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:26 PM
Jul 2012

Denying basic general public services to people in an area now under heat death advisory? That's going to win friends and influence people. It goes to show who owns what...and it's not we, the people. Time to take it all back.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
115. "basic general public services"?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:17 PM
Jul 2012

Is the City responsible for providing water and air conditioning to people who made no effort to provide for themselves?

Here in Tucson we never go anywhere without water and some kind of sun-protection.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
153. "Let them die" is a Libertarian position. I'm not getting this at all.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:47 PM
Jul 2012

Are we not responsible for our brother and sister's well-being? Do we not act when someone is in dire need?

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
220. Don't forget Wilson Goode, Dem and Philly Mayor in 1985 when
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 05:10 PM
Jul 2012

the Philly PD firebombed MOVE headquarters and killed 11 terrorists disguised as women and children.

madashelltoo

(1,696 posts)
19. Philadelphia's mayor is a Democrat
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 09:10 PM
Jul 2012

Nutter has swings that defy explanation at times. There are lots of us who voted for him because WE had no other choice. A Repig would have been out of the question.

Response to Fumesucker (Reply #1)

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
16. Thank you. You know, the problem with coordinating crowd control
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 08:38 PM
Jul 2012

at the Federal level is that each stop is a heads up for the next one.

Hoover would be proud of this.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
10. Nutter is only a Democrat because everyone here is a Democrat.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 08:12 PM
Jul 2012

There is practically no Republican Party to speak of in this city. Nutter is a right wing asshole. Anti-Union, anti-public education, anti-anything good for the People. He's a piece of shit and I hate that he is my Mayor. The party machine is so strong here that almost nothing can be done to break it open. I ran for committeeman here a few years ago and they even rigged that election for the incumbent. We're so screwed here locally. The only good thing is that the city will vote 90% for Obama in November.

PCIntern

(25,531 posts)
22. Then you remember,
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 09:34 PM
Jul 2012

That the first thing he did when elected mayor was to threaten to close the city libraries and pools. For all the idiots we've had his mayor over the years, none have been so anti-populist as this "gentleman".

He has been an absolute zero in terms of his ability to work with business interests, people, the professionals, and even his own staff. So naturally, he is the first mayor in my memory to run fundamentally unopposed for reelection. It was unbelievable that no one and I mean no one, challenged him in any way, shape, or form. He makes ourformer mayor, the incompetent W Wilson Goode seem like Teddy Roosevelt by comparison. Mayor Goode by the way was the mayor who dropped the bomb on the MOVE headquarters back in the 80s thoughts igniting an entire neighborhood because the people who inhabited the building we're guilty of public disruption and dirty habits. Oh yes, and noise: they made a lot of noise. So this guy figured the best thing to do would be to drop the device on to their home and blow it up. Well, things as many of us recall, did not work out so well. Of course the mayor was reelected in a landslide.

Great town this one.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
33. The MOVE bomb makes Goode much worse in my book
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:25 PM
Jul 2012

In fact, I think that puts Goode right in the same ballpark as Frank Rizzo.

Larry Ogg

(1,474 posts)
41. When republicans cant get elected in democrat dominated areas...
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:39 PM
Jul 2012

They need only to call themselves a democrat, and you will find enough clueless democrats that will, believing it's the safe thing to do, vote for democrats no matter what. Unfortunately, this is how good people vote into power, evil predators like Adolf Hitler, and all they have to do is call themselves a democrat.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
81. Yes. In this bizzarro world I'm considering running as a Republican.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 05:27 AM
Jul 2012

On a true Democratic platform. So crazy it might work.

Larry Ogg

(1,474 posts)
85. In reading your comment, and then your sig line...,
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:35 AM
Jul 2012

"If we must do evil to prevent evil there is nothing worth saving."

I am reminded as to why there are so few honest people in government.

Honest people have a conscience, and that makes it difficult for them to conceal their true motives, not only from the voters, but more importantly, from the big money predators who finance the campaigns of crony con-artist.

And honest people need not apply; the game is most certainly rigged in the favor of the bad guys.

BumRushDaShow

(128,841 posts)
18. "He would like to make sure none of his precious campaign donors"
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 08:49 PM
Jul 2012

He doesn't need any "donors". He is a lame duck.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
26. asked about denying water to the protesters in dangerously oppressive heat: "Just following orders."
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 09:57 PM
Jul 2012

OWS Week
Casseroles Solidarity March about to leave Franklin Square in Philadelphia. Philly Fire Chief's response when asked about denying water to the protesters in dangerously oppressive heat: "Just following orders."

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=403972222982051&set=a.332383203474287.74901.314960565216551&type=1&theater

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
27. The Occupiers are pretty naive to depend on the Establishment to support them.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:09 PM
Jul 2012

They should have foreseen this and arranged independent sources. Hindsight is 20/20 I know, but I can't fault the PTB for taking advantage of the weather to diminish Occupy's impact. It's just good tactics.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
50. What are you implying?
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:59 PM
Jul 2012

That the City of Philadelphia agreed to provide logistical support to Occupy and then broke it's agreement? Do you know that happened?

I didn't see that in the info provided, but it's possible, I guess. Is the city providing free water for others as a matter of policy, and discriminating against Occupy?

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
55. It's the proactive refusal that bothers most people, I think.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:10 PM
Jul 2012

Not the most humane way to handle a protest....

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
58. Do you know what Occupy planned?
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:14 PM
Jul 2012

And now the city's EMS have been in the awkward position of denying water to the public in a heat wave.

That's not good unless they want to drum up business.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
69. I have no idea - do you?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:07 AM
Jul 2012

Occupy's failure to publicize and organize this Fourth of July to-do was pretty disappointing to me. I had high hopes last Fall, but they seem to have squandered their momentum. They remind me a little of the various Tea Party entities post-2010 when the Koch's stopped supporting them (so much) and they turned on each other.

They did succeed in raising the public consciousness towards income inequality, but I don't see them as having a viable Second Act at this time. A Republican sweep of the Presidency and legislatures would empower them, of course, but I'm not rooting for that to happen, obviously.

As for Philly's EMS, I'm sure they will hydrate anyone in dire need, but it is Occupy's responsibility to provide it's own logistical support, not the city's. Those are the kinds of tasks that build capability and experience for an organization. They need to demonstrate self sufficiency and competance before they can solve the rest of our problems.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
71. Well, I've watched dozens of these big protests and the only time
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:22 AM
Jul 2012

they lacked for water was when their stuff was confiscated or when the police disrupted the supply line somehow. If you deny them the use of water, you effectively end the protest, right? It's too soon to call them incompetent because we don't have enough information.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
74. And that's their problem.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:45 AM
Jul 2012

They thought they have a right to the city water supply, which the city gets and pays for the same as the citizenry. By that logic they should depend on the city to feed and house them as well. I'm not calling them incompetent, but I will stand by my accusation of naivety. It's hard to grow a grass roots organization without any hierarchy - they'll have to invent some new ways of doing things.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
75. No, that's your assumption which as far as we know hasn't been verified.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:08 AM
Jul 2012

As far as assuming access to the city's emergency services, that is likely the law.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
77. What assumption?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:29 AM
Jul 2012

This was a planned (poorly) event, not a scheduled emergency. An adequate supply of water, including anticipating for summer weather, was not the responsibility of the city EMS. They showed up, demanded water from the city, and then say they're being repressed when the city fails to oblige. Just go to Wawa and buy some water.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
78. You are assuming Occupy didn't have its own water supply.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:35 AM
Jul 2012

You don't know that is true. Historically, it's highly unlikely.

And yes, assisting people in trouble from the heat is most definitely the province of EMS.

You don't have enough information to make faces, lol. But go right ahead, if it makes you happy.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
105. It's sad that in this day of global mass media it is certain
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:07 AM
Jul 2012

that there is some kid in sub-saharan Africa watching this and thinking "how fucking stupid are Americans? How are you guys rich and I'm poor? You can't even figure out that you should drink water when it's hot out?"

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
108. It's pretty clear from the linked article that they didn't plan on having their own water supply
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:20 AM
Jul 2012
Occupiers intended to be able to get water from a fire station nearby where the Gathering has been taking place (right downtown around Independence Mall). When occupiers went to get water for participants who would be at today’s activities, a firefighter said the department could not give occupiers water. A direct order had been given from Nutter to not provide water to occupiers.


The use of "would be" makes it clear that they went to get water not for people that were already there and in need of water at that moment, but rather they went there to stock up for anticpated attendees. Why would they do that if they had planned to supply their own water?

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
127. I don't know. I asked Kevin Gosztola and @tigerbeat
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:29 PM
Jul 2012

but they are involved with the situation ongoing and I still don't get it. At one point, someone reported the Quakers negotiated with the city and water was turned on somewhere. Or, not. LOL.

But this is a five day event and these people plan everything. Matt Taibbi is speaking right now. The plan was not "trust the city". I just haven't been able to figure out what it was / is.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
79. Precisely.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:10 AM
Jul 2012

It's not a secret that the weather has been very hot lately. Someone planning this exercise would have taken that into consideration.

If, say, a union was overseeing that protest, there would have been tons of advance publicity, there would be clear, readable signs for the protesters, a schedule of events promulgated by organizational people who ensured the protest got started on time, people to keep the rest of the group moving, people going from group to group passing out free ice cold plastic bottles of water, and other people going from group to group taking the empties and recycling them so the group didn't leave a mess for the city to deal with.

There would be no need to go to a fire station and say "Give me water."

I'm surprised some profiteers didn't get out there and make a few sales...or maybe they did.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
229. Oh, but you do endorse it with your phrase 'good tactics' and
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 06:55 PM
Jul 2012

your silence about the cruelty taking place.

I'm sure you'd find a way to call someone dieing of heat stroke there just a "failure to plan ahead."

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
28. Protesters and media being kettled, arrested
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:13 PM
Jul 2012

The NLG number in Philadelphia is 484-758-0488, please retweet, people are being arrested. #natgat

The recorded stream will come up:

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/jrozlive

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
35. ALERT:There is no video from #NATGAT MASS ARREST. All streamers have been arrested.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:30 PM
Jul 2012

Jayron ?@Jayron26

ALERT:There is no video from #NATGAT MASS ARREST. All streamers have been arrested. #OO #OPDX #OCHI #OLA #OCCUPYPHILLY #OCCUPYBOSTON

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
29. These Occupiers are too stupid to live
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:20 PM
Jul 2012

What part of conflict do they not understand? You don't go to battle expecting your enemy to give you stuff.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
34. Hi there. I'm an Occupier.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:30 PM
Jul 2012

And if you deny general public services to one group, you must deny them to all.

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
46. Yes, tooo stoooopid
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:46 PM
Jul 2012

You cannot depend upon a fire station's water supply during a drought. That water is earmarked for nothing but fires.

Plan better. It can be done.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
51. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:00 PM
Jul 2012

Fire departments respond to all kinds of public emergencies, not just fires. EMS for Philadelphia is out of the fire department. Duh.

http://www.phila.gov/fire/units_and_services/units_ems_overview.html

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
61. Occupiers creating an "emergency" where none exists
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:31 PM
Jul 2012

Plan better. All it takes is some planning and a few dollars and you are not dependent upon strapped water resources during a drought.

No sympathy.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
63. You are criticizing a situation you have no knowledge or understanding of
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:41 PM
Jul 2012

and your criticism should be taken with that in mind.

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
65. Occupiers are creating an "emergency:" where none exists and you have no knowledge..
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:43 PM
Jul 2012

or understanding of how fucked up that is and your posts should be taken with that in mind.

FUCK OCCUPY. If they cannot plan their own protests, they are worthless and should be dismissed as idiots.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
104. Emergency care would be a general public service
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:07 AM
Jul 2012

I doubt that providing water for protesters would be considered a general public service.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
110. Can you imagine protesters milling around outside the fire station while getting water?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:31 AM
Jul 2012

Without meaning to, they would make it more difficult for engines to leave in case of a real emergency.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
139. Obviously then, water is something which needs to be free.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:06 PM
Jul 2012

To boldly deny someone a basic human need in these conditions is inhuman.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
141. You're right, it's a basic human need
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:20 PM
Jul 2012

All the more reason for the Occupiers to have planned to provide it rather than assuming that someone would provide it for them.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
142. If you're sick of the 1%, how about being sick of the(ir) concept of paying for water.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:24 PM
Jul 2012

No other animal on Earth pays for water.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
145. Being sick of the 1% doesn't mean that the Occupiers don't have to exercise some responsiblity
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:33 PM
Jul 2012

You think water should be free? Fine. But if you know it isn't, and you know you're going to have a large gathering in sweltering heat, why would you not make plans to ensure that water is available?

Hint: Assuming that the city, who has to pay for the water, is going to give it away for free is not a plan.

As for other animals not charging for water, I'm not aware of any animals that pull the water from where it is to where it is needed, treat it, and distribute it to individual habitats for the use of others of their species.

If you think it's just the 1% that are involved in the distribution of water, you're sadly mistaken.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
148. I think horizontalism must be the way to go, if everyone is okay with people dying from heat.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:39 PM
Jul 2012

That's some scary stuff there; I can't parse that so many are okay with a system which not only decrees it, but would allow it.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
150. Quick question, yes or no
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jul 2012

Do the Occupiers have any responsiblity to provide and care for the people that they are bringing in for the protests?

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
158. Quick question, yes or no, do we care for our brothers and sisters in dire need?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:51 PM
Jul 2012

"The people who live in tornado alley, just as I live in hurricane alley, they should have insurance," Paul said.

Ron Paul: No Federal Financial Aid for Tornado Victims

http://news.yahoo.com/ron-paul-no-federal-financial-aid-tornado-victims-102533838.html

Seriously.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
173. I will not step into your distractions. Take care of people in need, period. End of story.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jul 2012

Unless you wish to continue to argue for not taking care of people in need...?

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
178. Why do you think they can not take care of themselves?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:17 PM
Jul 2012

Are they not adults, capable of walking down the street to the nearest shop?

Your blatently implied assumption of the protestors' incompetence is disturbing.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
209. Why didn't some of the Occupiers care enough about their fellow protesters
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:11 PM
Jul 2012

to care of their needs, i.e., providing water? You talk a good game about everyone taking care of each other, yet you don't expect the Occupiers to take care of each other.

Why not?

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
211. Occupy organizers are providing water to participants in Philly, per I text I just received.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:17 PM
Jul 2012

There are water stations set up for participants. Occupy is not incompetent.

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
214. Maybe they did have water stations yesterday, too. It doesn't negate the mayor's behavior.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:22 PM
Jul 2012

The fact that Occupy organizers are providing water to participants doesn't negate the fact that the mayor appears to be making things as difficult as possible for Occupy. Both things can be true at the same time.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
215. Yes, both things can be true at the same time
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:25 PM
Jul 2012

But since the outcry was that people were going to be suffering heat stroke because the mayor wouldn't give them water, it's highly doubtful.

Bottom line is that protesters should come prepared to sustain the protest, and given the hue and cry yesterday, that didn't seem to be the case. Especially given that the protesters went to the fire station to get water for people that "would" be coming. No one was ill, no one was dying, no one was in dire need of water for health reasons. They just wanted free water.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
219. I don't have contempt for them at all
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 05:00 PM
Jul 2012

They're out there fighting the hard fight that others of us aren't or can't. They're smart, they have a vision and they have goals.

And that's what's so maddening about something that is so silly and so easily avoided. I can't think of a single city over the last few months that has welcomed Occupy with open arms, eager to help in any way they could. Why would the Occupy leaders think that this would be different? I mean come on - they're protesting and speaking truth to power, and they expect the people that hold that power to sustain them because they didn't come prepared to sustain themselves?

Expecting the city to provide them free water just feeds into the stereotypes that the right tries to promulgate about Occupy - that they're lazy do nothings that want everything handed to them.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
124. Since when did the fire department
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:48 PM
Jul 2012

providing drinking water to people become a public service. If you go hiking in a state park are the employees responsible for providing you with drinking water, of course not. It's time for a reality check, bring your own water. You are responsible for your own health and well being, not the city.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
133. "Ron Paul: No Federal Financial Aid for Tornado Victims"
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:45 PM
Jul 2012
http://news.yahoo.com/ron-paul-no-federal-financial-aid-tornado-victims-102533838.html

Please consider. Would "let them die of heat stroke and dehydration" be a similar stance, and if so, why take it?
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
138. Obviously water is something which needs to be free.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:05 PM
Jul 2012

To boldly deny someone a basic human need in these conditions is inhuman. Have we sunk this low:

"The people who live in tornado alley, just as I live in hurricane alley, they should have insurance," (Ron) Paul said.

Ron Paul: No Federal Financial Aid for Tornado Victims

http://news.yahoo.com/ron-paul-no-federal-financial-aid-tornado-victims-102533838.html

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
140. Water IS free. Go get some.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:11 PM
Jul 2012

Just not at the fire department. They don't sit around all day waiting for crowds of people to show up for water.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
37. Yeah, so stupid to expect public servants to serve the public.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:34 PM
Jul 2012

Well, Occupy got a good story out of it, which is likely what they wanted in the first place.
 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
47. So a fire station gives out all its water during a drought to Occupiers and then a fire happens.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:47 PM
Jul 2012

Seriously, suggesting such a thing is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
62. Have you?
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:32 PM
Jul 2012

You'd rather houses burn down and real sick people die so you can hold a protest?

Fuck that shit, plan the protest better. There's a fucking drought on.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
100. I would be willing to bet that 9 out of 10 people reading this.....
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:57 AM
Jul 2012

will think - They knowingly went to protest in 90+ degree heat and didn't bring water. That's bright.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
136. "...evolution in action" is a Larry Niven line, and he's a die-hard Ronald Reagan fan.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jul 2012

"Let them die" would be a Libertarian stance, yes?

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
171. Let them die, dog eat dog. That's quite a philosophy you have there.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:08 PM
Jul 2012

Seems to be much of the root of our problems today. Imma Occupy that!

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
175. You've ascribed a position to me that I do not hold.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:13 PM
Jul 2012

Your omniscience is Teh Phale.

Interestingly enough, you've also back-handed the protesters by repeatedly insinuating that they are too stupid to go get water on their own.

Who's the one with "quite a philosophy" around here?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
57. Seriously?
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:13 PM
Jul 2012

I mean here you are deeming people "too stupid to live" because they're relying on public infrastructure to provide a basic human need instead of, dunno, sinking a lot of money into Aquifina or some other corporate water you favor.

Seriously.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
91. The establishment doesn't care about little people, let's protest!
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:29 AM
Jul 2012

Hey the establishment won't support our protest. What gives?

joelz

(185 posts)
30. here an issue Democratic and Republican leaders can
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:23 PM
Jul 2012

agree upon they both have good (from their point of view) reasons for this listing to and occupy speaker like Cris Hedges for 15 or 20 minutes make this very clear.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
42. Philadelphia Police Civil Affairs - 215-685-3685
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:41 PM
Jul 2012

Wendyofthe99percent ?@OneLoveOccupy

Philadelphia Police Civil Affairs - 215-685-3685 #NATGAT @OccupyNG

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
43. Report: all the live streamers have been arrested
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:41 PM
Jul 2012

T. Fawkes ?@AnonToth

ALERT:There is no video from ‪#NATGAT‬ MASS ARREST. All streamers have been arrested. ‪#OO‬ ‪#OPDX‬ ‪#OCHI‬ ‪#OLA‬ ‪#OCCUPYPHILLY‬ ‪#OCCUPYBOSTON

https://twitter.com/AnonToth/status/219618523067072512

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
44. Children's Crusade From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:42 PM
Jul 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Crusade

The Children's Crusade is the name given to a disastrous Crusade by Christian children to expel Muslims from the Holy Land said to have taken place in 1212...The variants of the long-standing story of the Children's Crusade have similar themes. A boy began preaching in either France or Germany claiming that he had been visited by Jesus and told to lead a Crusade to peacefully convert Muslims to Christianity. Through a series of supposed portents and miracles he gained a considerable following, including possibly as many as 30,000 children. He led his followers south towards the Mediterranean Sea, in the belief that the sea would part on their arrival, allowing him and his followers to march to Jerusalem, but this did not happen. Two merchants gave free passage on boats to as many of the children as were willing, but they were actually either taken to Tunisia and sold into slavery, or died in a shipwreck on San Pietro Island off Sardinia during a gale. Some may have failed to reach the sea, dying or giving up from starvation and exhaustion.

The traditional narrative is probably conflated from some factual and mythical notions of the period including visions by a French or German boy, an intention to peacefully convert Muslims in the Holy Land to Christianity, bands of children marching to Italy, and children being sold into slavery....According to more recent research there seem to have actually been two movements of people (of all ages) in 1212 in Germany and France. The similarities of the two allowed later chroniclers to combine and embellish the tales.

In the first movement, Nicholas, a shepherd from the Rhineland in Germany who possessed an extraordinary power of speech, tried to lead a group across the Alps and into Italy in the early spring of 1212. Nicholas promised that the sea would dry up before them and allow his followers to cross into the Holy Land. Rather than intending to fight the Saracens, he said that the Moslem kingdoms would be defeated when their citizens converted to Christianity. His disciples went off to preach the call for the "Crusade" across the German lands, and they massed in Cologne after a few weeks. Splitting into two groups, the crowds took different roads through Switzerland. Two out of every three people on this ghastly journey died, while many others returned to their homes. About 7,000 arrived in Genoa in late August. They immediately marched to the harbor, expecting the sea to divide before them; when it did not many became bitterly disappointed. A few accused Nicholas of betraying them, while others settled down to wait for God to change his mind, since they believed that it was unthinkable he would not eventually do so. The Genoese authorities were impressed by the little band, and they offered citizenship to those who wished to settle in their city. Most of the would-be Crusaders took up this opportunity. Nicholas refused to admit defeat and traveled to Pisa, his movement continuing to break up along the way. He and a few loyal followers continued to the Papal States, where Pope Innocent III treated them kindly enough. The remaining ones departed for Germany after the Pontiff told them to be good and return home. Nicholas did not survive the second attempt across the Alps; back home his father was arrested and hanged under pressure from angry families whose relatives had perished while following the child.

Some of the most dedicated members of this Crusade were later reported to have wandered to Ancona and Brindisi; none reached the Holy Land.

The second movement was led by a twelve-year-old French shepherd boy named Stephan of Cloyes, who claimed in June that he bore a letter for the king of France from Jesus. Large gangs of youth around his age were drawn to him, most of whom claimed to possess special gifts of God and thought themselves miracle workers. Attracting a following of over 30,000 adults and children, he went to Saint-Denis, where he was seen to cause miracles. On the orders of Philip II, advised by the University of Paris, the people were implored to return home. Philip himself did not appear impressed, especially since his unexpected visitors were led by a mere child, and refused to take them seriously. Stephan, however, was not dissuaded, and began preaching at a nearby abbey. From Saint-Denis, Stephan traveled around France, spreading his messages as he went, promising to lead charges of Christ to Jerusalem. Although the Church was skeptical, many adults were impressed by his teaching. Still, few of those who initially joined him possessed his activeness; it is estimated that there were less than half the initial 30,000 remaining, a figure that was shrinking rapidly, rather than growing as perhaps anticipated.

At the end of June 1212, Stephan led his largely juvenile Crusaders from Vendôme to Marseilles. They survived by begging for food, while the vast majority seem to have been disheartened by the hardship of this journey and returned to their families.



A study published in 1977 cast doubt on the existence of these events, and many historians came to believe that they were not (or not primarily) children but multiple bands of "wandering poor" in Germany and France, some of whom tried to reach the Holy Land and others who never intended to do so. Early versions of events, of which there are many variations told over the centuries, are largely apocryphal...Recent research suggests the participants were not children, at least not the very young. The confusion started because later chroniclers, who were not witness to the events of 1212 and who were writing 30 years or more later, began to translate the original accounts and understood the Latin word pueri, meaning "boys", to mean literally "children". The original accounts did use the term pueri, but it had a derogatory slang meaning, as in present-day calling an adult man a "boy" to be condescending. In the early 13th century, bands of wandering poor started cropping up throughout Europe; these were people displaced by economic changes at the time which forced many peasants in northern France and Germany to sell their land—they were often referred to condescendingly as pueri. This mistaken literal interpretation of pueri as "children" gave rise to the idea of a "Children's Crusade" by later authors who found the story too good not to be true, particularly with so much public support and interest in crusading. Within a generation or two after 1212, the idea of children going on crusade became ingrained in history, retold countless times over the centuries with many different versions, and only in the 20th century has the myth been re-examined by looking at the earliest sources (see Historical studies AT LINK).
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
53. No time for sermons, we're busy doing things.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:03 PM
Jul 2012

My favorite was when Occupy Fights Foreclosures recently won back a widow's home from an illegal foreclosure.

http://occupyobservations.blogspot.com/2012/05/dirma-beats-foreclosure.html

and were in Sacremento this week demanding action against foreclosures.

And:

http://whatthefuckhasoccupydone.com/

And what is Occupy doing in LA these days:

http://626wilshire.wikispaces.com/NoWalmartInChinatown

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
45. Piss poor planning on the part of Occupy planners.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:44 PM
Jul 2012

They should have planned for a source for water. Many water systems in cities from Illinois down to the Gulf and across to the Atlantic are overtaxed. There's definitely a public safety reason to not allow a fire station's water supply to be used for this as they need to have water read for potential fires.

There's a drought on and it's been obvious there would be a drought for months. The Occupy people need to plan better.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
48. 30 Occupiers and 2 streamers arrested.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:47 PM
Jul 2012

cliff potts ?@cliffpotts

RT @korgasm_: Philly PD arrested every single marcher (~30) AND the streamers tonight #natgat #ows #oo #occupy (live at...

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
60. Unless arrangements were made ahead of time
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:31 PM
Jul 2012

I don't know why the city is under obligation to provide free water. I'm sure the fire department has to pay the agency that provides water. They are all separate municipal taxing units. Whenever I go to events, the organizers provide the water, not the city. Why would this be any different?

Why should taxpayers foot the bill for free water for protesters? Should the city provide free water for the next KKK demonstration?

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
66. Deny to one, deny to all. Period.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:46 PM
Jul 2012

Oh wait, cops don't beat up KKK and neo-nazis when they march or gather.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
72. It's more likely that they were cut off from their own stuff somehow.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:41 AM
Jul 2012

I've never seen a protest where water wasn't available. Disrupting the water is a way to control or end the protest.

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
89. It doesn't work that way
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:11 AM
Jul 2012

Cops and government are ALWAYS guilty of unprovoked, horrible abuses -- no evidence required. Protesters are always innocent victims of malevolent forces, and if you have video evidence proving otherwise, the perpetrators are actually cops or not affiliated with the movement -- no evidence required.

See. Easy peasy.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
93. In this case it looks like they were just expecting the fire department to
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:31 AM
Jul 2012

provide them with free water and they were denied.

It is called the "fire" department not the "water" department. If you have a fire call them. If you're thirsty, call someone else.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
76. What? They didn't bring water to the revolution? And these are folks we're relying on.....
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:10 AM
Jul 2012

to lead us to the Promised Land? Seeing how the report is from NorquistDogLake, I'll reserve judgement of the Mayor.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
80. Just bring their own water
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:15 AM
Jul 2012

Or arrange with sympathetic businesses to get water. How are they entitled to have the city provide anything?

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
86. Agreed.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:49 AM
Jul 2012

It's summer, therefore it's hot. Bring your own water.
If there is a fire call, people have to get out of the way of the firefighters and their equipment. Then I suppose they would complain that they were thrown out of the firehouse.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
88. Why can't the protesters
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:57 AM
Jul 2012

bring their own water. Camel packs are available everywhere. In addition why is the fire department under any obligation to provide water to protesters. The organizers should set up water stations along the route. I am sure something can be worked out. Contract with one of the local water vendors on a short term agreement might be an option.

The organizers of these protests are a very sharp group of people, I am sure they will work it out.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
120. who ever puts the protests together
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:36 PM
Jul 2012

they aren't just spontaneous. There has to be some leadership somewhere that handles logistics.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
137. Absolutely. An 'organic' and 'leaderless' movement is destined to flounder.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:02 PM
Jul 2012

That's been pointed out many, many times on DU. But there are always excuses for why no one wants to step up.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
101. "The organizers of these protests are a very sharp group of people"
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:02 AM
Jul 2012

lol

They didn't plan for water.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
191. True...
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:33 PM
Jul 2012

Oh wait. Nevermind. It doesn't. This make them look so foolish I tend to think the story was planted.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
92. Sounds like a case of poor planning
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:29 AM
Jul 2012
Occupiers intended to be able to get water from a fire station...

FAIL. Anyone who ventures outside in the heat without bringing sufficient water for his or her own needs is a fool.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
95. Is there a possible lawsuit against this mayor..
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:33 AM
Jul 2012

.. if a citizen becomes seriously ill or dies because of this? Are firestations NOT PUBLIC PROPERTY? Is not the mission of PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL to protect and serve the HEALTH and SAFETY of THE PUBLIC?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
112. Is this your judicial opinion as an actual judge?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:54 AM
Jul 2012

Or just your opinion as another layperson? Persons, businesses, and government agencies have lost BIG lawsuits with much less cause than this. I can't say for sure, and anyone who claims to know the outcome of case BEFORE it even has happened really doesn't carry much wait or credibility. (Might I refer you to the recent Obamacare ruling and all of the smug dickheads making predictions that it would be struck down?) BTW, thanks for ignoring the rest of what I asked, that's VERY telling.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
117. "I can't say for sure"
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:23 PM
Jul 2012

No you can't. Some things really are simple. Please call 911 next time you are thirsty.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
106. Firestations are public property.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:13 AM
Jul 2012

Firefighters protect the health and safety of the public putting out fires and running into burning building to get people out.

The idea of a lawsuit here is ridiculous.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
123. Still ridiculous, sorry.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:43 PM
Jul 2012

Water is for sale in every gas station, grocery store and bodega. Cities are under no obligation to provide Occupy with water.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
126. I know dood or doodette.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:19 PM
Jul 2012

It really is ridiculous to think that a mayor of a city would risk putting himself and the entire city into the likelihood of a liability suit by deliberately issuing an executive order to deny PUBLIC SERVICES to the PUBLIC, KNOWING full well that doing so could result in serious bodily injury or even death. Hey, but since you have said so, I guess they have no worries. Won't happen. Rock on.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
130. Since when is it a firefighter's job to provide water to
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:35 PM
Jul 2012

protesters?
Doling out bottled water to them is not a PUBLIC SERVICE. There has been a nasty heat wave here. Nobody expects this city to provide anybody out in the heat with bottled water. Everybody I passed on the street had their own bottle of water or GatorAde. Sounds like they showed up without water looking for an excuse to sue somebody. It's a stupid publicity stunt, making occupy look foolish and litigation happy.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
155. Fine, assume away.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jul 2012

I think it's foolish for people to spend hours in the heat without water. If that's what they want to do, then fine. Assuming firefighters have the time to give water away is ridiculous. The area around the firehouse has to be kept clear in case there is a fire call. How you got your 1% crap from that is beyond me.

Enjoy your day.

Bodhi BloodWave

(2,346 posts)
203. a true friend would tell said friend when they are acting in an idiotic manner
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:53 PM
Jul 2012

i don't see a defense of the 1%, better to point out the truth then cheer somebody on when they are acting wrongly

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
218. Who's "defending" the 1%?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:55 PM
Jul 2012

The 1% did not show up without supplies, nor did they take any from anyone.

They did not, in fact, have anything to do with this.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
96. If only Occupy read DU...
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:33 AM
Jul 2012

there was a thread here just the other day reminding us all to bring water with us when hiking. Same thing goes for protesting.

Sid

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
97. It's rather brutal to see people on DU cheering on the misery of the occupiers or any other human
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:36 AM
Jul 2012

beings.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
99. No one wants anyone to be miserable. (Well, for the vast majority of us, maybe.)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:45 AM
Jul 2012

But this is yet another ridiculous contortion for protesters to see themselves as victims and that we should all join in to help them as they battle the establishment for...free water.

If they want to see themselves as victims, they are welcome to that. I don't celebrate their misery but I am mystified as to why they put themselves in this position.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
103. I think it's more "they created problems for themselves"
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:05 AM
Jul 2012

that should have been immediately recognizable to anyone with an ounce of common sense. I've never organized a mass anything but you can bet that in the middle of summer any outdoor event I was forced to put together would include copious amounts of water everywhere.

They're going to change the system but they don't have the wherewithal to even provide for their own self-preservation?

This is like complaining about getting hit by a car because no one was there to look both ways for you. Or blaming the government for making it cold in the winter and not giving you mittens.

Stupidity doesn't deserve sympathy.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
188. Not really
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:29 PM
Jul 2012

unless libertarians are the only ones who expect adults to be able to look after themselves for basic things.

This isn't a case of water being in short supply everywhere or people being unable to afford it.

They just assumed someone else would always be there to provide it to them.

Like the difference between saying the poor should starve during times of depression because they ought to provide for themselves (even though food is too scarce/expensive for them to be able to get) and saying it's the governments fault you went hungry on your car trip because they didn't pull up along side you and hand you a snack (and of course you could never be expected to pack your own snacks).

One is heartless and ultimately devastating to society. The other is common sense.

They aren't dying, they aren't cut off from water. They are just expected (LIKE EVERY OTHER MASS GATHERING) to provide for their own refreshments.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
114. I agree 1000%
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:59 AM
Jul 2012

There is a mean-spiritedness that I would expect from Teabaggers that has infested some self-righteous individuals around here. Kind of sickening to see.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
119. Really? I can only dimly imagine the glee here...
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:35 PM
Jul 2012

should T.B.ers pull a similarly fucktarded stunt. It would beat the iverglas banning by a light-year.

Stupidity should NEVER be pandered to, no matter what politics it flows from.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
156. Seriously, who said anything about "Let them die"?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jul 2012

Don't play the fool, you do it... poorly.

No-one is forcing those people to stay against their will. They can go procure water on their own resources, as it should be, at any time.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
160. The conditions have already been stated as ripe for heat stroke and death.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:53 PM
Jul 2012

Since when are we all agreeing with Ron Paul?

"The people who live in tornado alley, just as I live in hurricane alley, they should have insurance," Paul said.

Ron Paul: No Federal Financial Aid for Tornado Victims

http://news.yahoo.com/ron-paul-no-federal-financial-aid-tornado-victims-102533838.html

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
165. If you don't see a difference between a tornado and carrying a bottle or two of water....
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:58 PM
Jul 2012

I fear for the future of the Democratic Party.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
172. I fear for the future of the world when people can't see allowing
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:10 PM
Jul 2012

someone in heat stroke conditions, no matter the reason, a bottle or two of water. Sorry.

Throd

(7,208 posts)
187. I fear a future where adults are too stupid or lazy to supply the most basic survival need.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:25 PM
Jul 2012

Nobody is rounding them up in a compound and denying them water.

They are appearing in public on their own volition in record summer heat.

richmwill

(1,326 posts)
157. Agreed...
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jul 2012

If the T.B.'ers held a rally and screamed about no free water being provided to them, I couldn't even predict how many posts would laugh, call them idiots, state "Good, screw them", etc. If you want water at your rally/protest, simple. Buy it and bring it. As another poster said, what's next- they demand the city provide them with free delivered meals too?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
190. Don't forget coats in the winter
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:31 PM
Jul 2012

expecting them to dress appropriately as if they were sentient adult human beings is terribly heartless and dare I say extremely rightwing.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
118. I can't believe people wouldn't go out in the heat without anything to drink..
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:33 PM
Jul 2012

thinking if they get thirsty they'll just take a hose of the back of the truck and spray it down their throat hole LOL...


Or maybe it's just an Occupy publicity stunt. Regardless nobody will care about it by tomorrow at 3:23 CST

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
192. How much would it cost to rent a large water tank and trailer
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:33 PM
Jul 2012

like they use at construction sites?

Not much. Then I'm sure there is at least one sympathetic homeowner in town with a hose they can borrow to fill it up.

Assign everyone a solo cup and bam. Problem solved for maybe a hundred bucks or so.

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
198. I'm reporting a text I just received from somebody who is in Philly at Occupy.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:44 PM
Jul 2012

They too heard the news reports that the fire station refused water to Occupy. Apparently that is true. But the organizers of Occupy were not counting on the fire station water alone. There are water stations set up around the protest sites.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
205. Seems like drummed up controversy then
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:55 PM
Jul 2012

"You won't give us water!!"


-You have water.


"Well yeah . . . but still . . . come on"


-Also this is the fire department. If you want water from us you are supposed to be on fire.



"Yeah. . . I guess that really isn't your job . . . huh . . . . outrage!"


yardwork

(61,588 posts)
200. It sounds like two things are true. One, the fire station did refuse water.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:46 PM
Jul 2012

Two, the Occupy organizers made other plans to provide water to the participants.

That's all I know, based on a text I just received.

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
212. I don't know that is fear mongering. The news reports are true, apparently.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:19 PM
Jul 2012

It sounds like the mayor is being a jerk. Occupy organizers are not incompetent, though. They are providing water to participants. Apparently the mayor is making this as difficult as he can. That's not fear mongering.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
217. It is not the Mayor's job, nor the city's obligation....
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 04:51 PM
Jul 2012

to provide such supplies. The people gathering are responsible for such things, including sanitation (toilets and trash) and emergency medical and security arrangements (police and fire). This is covered in the permiting processes, but Occupy seems to skip that more often than not, to my knowledge.

While their messages are good, their execution has been less than exemplary.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
227. I am seriously considering leaving DU for good because of it. This
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 06:42 PM
Jul 2012

thread really takes the cake for its careless brutality and gleeful cruelty.

Un-friggin-believable.

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
231. This thread is horrifying. Welcome to Ron Paul Underground.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:27 PM
Jul 2012
The social darwinists have taken over, ever prepared to hunt down Piggy with their rock.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
111. I hope the Quakers stand up to their usual standards. They have been on the right side of the
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:35 AM
Jul 2012

issue in every US event that I can recall. I think the mayor is asking too much.

 

Remember

(32 posts)
125. Don't stop
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jul 2012

The need for this group or any group to express itself is part American. We are a society that expresses ourselves regardless whether we agree. Get rid of the blank de blank. Throw the dip wad out of the party. Any Democrat that does this does not deserve any helping hand now or even if he changes later.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
135. One aspect of Occupy is that the illusion of scarcity is only an illusion.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:53 PM
Jul 2012

There are enough resources to feed, clothe, educate, and house everyone several times over. It is only the greed and hoarding of the rich making possible these miseries and death.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
144. No other animal
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:30 PM
Jul 2012

has protest marches either.What's your point? That everything should be free. Perhaps the city could buy everyone lunch as well.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
146. My point is freedom vs. Capitalism. Obviously, capitalism and its proponents are OK when people die.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:37 PM
Jul 2012

Again: Why do we pay for something that is a =natural= resource? That is certainly reason to protest and march

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
159. "Why do we pay for something that is a =natural= resource?"
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jul 2012

Because, in an artificial urban environment, it is neither free nor natural.

Your grasp of both economics and nature seems tenuous, at best.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
170. Well, yeah, but I figured I'd keep it narrow....
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:06 PM
Jul 2012

as those are the only two items I can be sure of on the evidence at hand.

Response to nobodyspecial (Reply #167)

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
189. I think I was being rather civil
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:31 PM
Jul 2012

considering that these are the accusations leveled at people who do not agree with the OP:

"What is getting me is that so many are buying so completely into a system which has decreed that human beings should and must suffer and die. That's what -I'm- not getting. That would be a lack of humanity, of brotherly love, of compassion, of integrity, of doing the right thing."

If there is a hurricane or other emergency, I believe the government should provide water. I don't think it is a duty for the government to step in just to give people free water because they didn't or won't do it for themselves. If the heat is too much, the adults can plan accordingly or take a break. They aren't captives or forced to be there or faced with circumstances beyond their control. If the weather is too much, they can adjust their plans -- just as all of us in this heat wave have had to do. I don't go out for a walk without water and get mad because the firefighters won't give me some. I don't wish anyone harm. I hope they are sensible and take care of themselves. And if someone is overcome by the heat, I'm sure the city will respond in such a true emergency.

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
147. Umm... no other animal filters out impurities and organisms
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:38 PM
Jul 2012

at water treatment plants so the water is not contaminated and then it is shipped and piped for widespread distribution. I'm sure nobody would stop the protesters from drinking out of a lake, stream or puddle -- you know, like animals do.

Solid analogies flow from logical thinking. It appears to be absent here.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
149. Seriously? You do not imagine that I am aware of our systems of storage and filtration and
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jul 2012

distribution?

What is getting me is that so many are buying so completely into a system which has decreed that human beings should and must suffer and die. That's what -I'm- not getting. That would be a lack of humanity, of brotherly love, of compassion, of integrity, of doing the right thing.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
185. A post on "brotherly love" would not be based on a lie.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:23 PM
Jul 2012

If there is anyone at the protest not capable of getting water on their own, I'm sure they will get the help they need.

I'm also sure that most of those folks are intelligent enough to help themselves out of a self-manufactured situation.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
201. The mean spirit runs deep in ..
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:46 PM
Jul 2012

... many here. Reminds of the same authoritarian, bootlicking I hear from Teabagger self-righteous "libertarians."

Mean people suck.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
223. I regularly hear almost exactly the same sentiment from..
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 05:26 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Mon Jul 2, 2012, 07:06 PM - Edit history (1)

.. bitter old Teabaggers all the time. You're in fine company.

Throd

(7,208 posts)
180. 135
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jul 2012

They just started to drop like flies. Eveybody was running about, flapping their arms screaming: "Oh my God! What is happening? Why is my mouth so dry?"

They needed 3 flatbed trucks to remove the corpses.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
184. If only they'd chanted...
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:23 PM
Jul 2012

"Hell no! We won't go! 'Til you give us H2O!"

Lol. I slay myself sometimes.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
181. "Nothing has happened yet so everything is okay?"
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jul 2012

They didn't die today from stated heat stroke conditions so it's impossible for anyone to die tomorrow?

Seriously?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
193. No other animal on earth gets to use the city water supply
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:35 PM
Jul 2012

not directly anyway.

They can go find a stream to drink from. You know what happens to animals that don't find water? That's right, the feds show up with bottled wat. . . no wait they die. They have the exact same freedoms as any other animal to go find water where they can. They just aren't entitled to it free and delivered from other people.

Also no other animal on earth can survive long without gathering their own food.

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
182. I just texted with somebody at Occupy in Philly.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jul 2012

They tell me that the organizers have water stations set up for participants. Yes, the fire station did refuse to provide water, but the organizers have their own water.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
199. What a humanitarian. Did he offer them cake as a substitute?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 03:44 PM
Jul 2012

"Practical politics" trumps common decency.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
233. Or.....
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:35 PM
Jul 2012

don't actively resist the police with physical force. If it's time for that, it's time to go all the way.

And it's not that time... yet.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
230. Thank you for posting this. It's at times like this that
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 07:10 PM
Jul 2012

I really question why anyone of conscience still bothers with the Democrats.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Philadelphia Mayor Appare...