Jackass Radicals can't discuss Alex Jones threats against Schiff without criticizing Schiff and more

[stevenleser]

They think Schiff should "Shut up" and is full of "Schitt" for saying there is evidence their direct or indirect candidate (Trump) conspired with Russia
https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/alex-joness-threat-to-congressman-may-be-a-felony/

Also while the Jackasses like to criticize Democrats for in their opinion "Not having spine" OPs posted there regarding the Nuclear option overcoming a Democratic filibuster have no comments several hours later and no acknowledgement that Democrats pulled together to do the only legislative thing they could to try to stand in the way of this terrible nominee:

https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/republicans-use-nuclear-option-to-clear-the-way-for-gorsuch-confirmation/

https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/mitch-mcconnell-goes-nuclear-to-break-supreme-court-filibuster/

and finally the armchair radicals are repeating false RW talking points about Rice and spying on Trump:

Bloomberg: Obama Nat'l Sec. Advisor Rice spied on Trump, lied on PBS
Finally, evidence from a solid source backs up the core accusations made that ranking officials of the outgoing Obama Administration spied on candidate Donald Trump and his close associates during the 2016 campaign. Furthermore, Bloomberg News correspondent Eli Lake identifies former National Security Advisor Susan Rice as having used NSC computers last year to review selected intelligence intercepts to identify specific U.S. citizens who communicated with foreign officials.

https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/bloomberg-obama-natl-sec-advisor-rice-spied-on-trump/

[LonePirate]

1. No surprise to me. That site has had a pro-45/anti-Dem element for several months now.

It's simply more easily visible nowadays. That place is anything but a home for progressive radicals which they mistakenly seem to think they are. Every DUer should stay away from that sewer and let it flounder and die.

[Iggo]

2. I really wish people would quit dragging that shit over here.

[yallerdawg]

3. Just a reminder that people aren't always who and what they say they are.

And that "the internet" reaches everywhere, including DU.

[G_j]

4. really

petty isn't it?

[Cha]

21. No, exposing those pawns for putin

and trolls for trump isn't "petty"..

Maybe they don't like the light being shined on them, tho.. or maybe they're proud of being exposed.

[G_j]

23. And then maybe some people

could care less, as the world is burning down all around us. 👀
No, certainly petty is in the eyes of the beholder.

[Cha]

24. Yeah, and they own a part of that.. so they can be exposed for the trolls they are

[G_j]

25. Exposing to who?

There is a world going on out here, I don't think it cares much if someone rails about some people at another website being trolls etc.. Sorry, I just don't see the great exposition as mattering much in the scheme of things. No offense, everything I've said in this thread really doesn't matter either. Maybe our time could be better spent. It's why I don't post there and rarely post here anymore. When you only check in once in awhile, it tends to look petty. whatever.. peace

[William769]

46. And jackass radicals are helping to burn the world down around us all.

They are actually worse than tea partiers. At least tea partiers will tell you up front who and what they are. Instead of sniveling little weasels that pretend to be something they are not.

[JesterCS]

28. I guess since I frequent JPR

I'm a Russian bot/hacker/putinista...... really most of the LBN forum looks identical to DU. Then again I didn't join for political reasons, just wanted another site I could read news and such

[Cha]

29. We've seen the OPs and posts over there. they speak for themselves

pawns for putin trolls for trump

[leftstreet]

5. +1

Sad thing is some really decent DUers got hoodwinked by that place

[GulfCoast66]

11. Decent?? I guess you are nicer than I

But what is sad is that some of them are still trying to slip their shit into DU on the sly.

[stevenleser]

8. Some of it IS here. I don't know why you think there is some magical separation.

We see some of those folks coming here to post the same nonsense.

[Iggo]

10. That's what I think?

[Cha]

22. Thank you for exposing it, Steven.

[R B Garr]

27. +1, yup, the same fake news, etc. Very predictable

and recognizable.

[LanternWaste]

14. "I really wish people would stop comparing and contrasting two demographics over here..."

"I really wish people would stop comparing and contrasting two demographics over here..."

[Iggo]

15. Feels to me more like gossip and tattling.

I can see now that there's another way of looking at it.

[JI7]

17. they were attackIng democrats for years on du and some still come back here

It's impoRtant to see where these people stand and the truth about what they are doing.

[Cha]

19. Too bad.. they are pawns for putin and trolls

for trump. their true intentions need to be exposed.

[NCTraveler]

6. They are the LIVing HA Goodman crowd.

They are worthy of scorn and ridicule. Some are still burching around these parts.

[stevenleser]

7. Update: Now there is a response to at least one of the filibuster OPs criticizing Democrats

As you would expect it's ridiculous. The Democrats mounted a filibuster. That's the option open to them.

[boston bean]

9. A decade of my life fighting those idiots here. Many misogynistic POS.

Good riddance to those posers.

[Initech]

12. Full of schitt? Masters of comedy they are!

[OnDoutside]

32. If Adam Schiff hadn't been truthful about "More than circumstantial", the Republicans would have

been all over him. But they haven't.

[geek tragedy]

13. meh, most of them have had the decency to stay away.

Better to have all the trolls in one place rather than having them returning.

We'll always have a few cranks at this place, but JPR definitely acted as a bait station to keep them out of here.

[Blue_Tires]

16. LOL I'm glad they're gone...

A few more here probably need to join them

[Cha]

18. the pawns for putin and the trolls for trump

are so full of hot gaseous same ol shit..

Mahalo for shining the Light, Steven..

[ismnotwasm]

20. Creepy fuckers

[still_one]

26. pathetic losers.

[betsuni]

30. Idiots.

[bobalew]

31. Jackass Radicals are Russian bots & Trolls, or haven't you figured that out yet?

NT

[Omaha Steve]

33. Didn't JPR get started after an invite only Hillary group of DUers...

Bragged openly about getting Bernie DUers jury hides etc. Said just as nasty things about DUers AND Bernie as you read on JPR. Even used their DU names before they got caught and added a password for entry.

Even even made fun of my dementia.

There are several posts and screenshots about it on the DU if you really want to go there. Just a quick search away.

It seems every DU post about JPR forgets how it got started.

I was not a BoB. I voted for Hillary.

I'm offline from now until late monday or Tuesday morning. Can't wait to catch up on replies when I get back.

OS

[stevenleser]

34. So your response to craziness from JPR is to use the whataboutism logical fallacy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

Whataboutism is a term describing a propaganda technique used by the Soviet Union in its dealings with the Western world during the Cold War. When criticisms were levelled at the Soviet Union, the response would be "What about..." followed by the naming of an event in the Western world.[1][2] It represents a case of tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy),[3] a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position, without directly refuting or disproving the opponent's initial argument.
-------------------------------------------------

We'll take that to mean you have no defense of what was posted in JPR because you know it is indefensible.

[Omaha Steve]

36. So you defend one group while criticizing another for the same behavior

[stevenleser]

37. My response is not at issue. Your use of a logical fallacy is. nt

[Omaha Steve]

38. Your double standard is an issue

[stevenleser]

39. No, it's not. Your attempt to frame it as such is a logical fallacy and thus invalid. nt

[Omaha Steve]

41. Since they went underground

Seems they aren't proud of their work anymore. I have o way of knowing if you post there.

[stevenleser]

42. Nope you are still using a logical fallacy. Address the JPR article. nt

[Omaha Steve]

44. I'm waiting to hear

Address how JPR came about!

[stevenleser]

47. No you are attempting to derail and deflect with a logical fallacy. Address the JPR OP. nt

[stevenleser]

40. P.S. thank you for kicking my thread I enjoy seeing the subject "Jackass Radicals"

Toward the top of list of articles on GD

[CajunBlazer]

43. No!

[BannonsLiver]

35. They're here tonight, bigly

Check out the Gabbard threads.

[William769]

45. Every damn one of them at JACKASS RADICALS are traitors and should be treated as such.

[stevenleser]

48. Absolutely. nt