Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 3494 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cons Are For War, Dems Are For The Poor... (Original Post)
Grassy Knoll
Apr 2017
OP
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)1. Clinton calls for strikes against Syrian airfields
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)7. .. A trap? ..
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)2. Cons are for Corporations who profit from War.
bdamomma
(63,923 posts)5. of course
they think about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and not about the victims who loose their lives.
BeyondGeography
(39,382 posts)3. The Freeps came out pretty strong against this tonight
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3541868/posts?q=1&;page=1#1
It has stabilized to 50/50 but lots of opposition in that thread.
It has stabilized to 50/50 but lots of opposition in that thread.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)6. Wow, Sobering