Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erinlough

(2,176 posts)
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 10:21 AM Apr 2017

We've been here before, and we made it through.



"An examination of Ulysses S. Grant's two terms as President of the United States (1869–1877) reveals many scandals and fraudulent activities associated with persons within his administration, including his cabinet, that was in continual transition, divided by the forces of political corruption and reform. Grant, ever trusting of associates, was himself influenced by both forces. The standards in many of his appointments were low, and charges of corruption were widespread.[1] Starting with the Black Friday (1869) gold speculation ring, corruption would be discovered in seven federal departments, including the Navy, Justice, War, Treasury, Interior, State, and the Post Office. Reform movements initiated in both the Democratic Party and the Liberal Republicans, a faction that split from Republican Party to oppose political patronage and corruption in the Grant administration. Nepotism was prevalent, with over 40 family members benefiting from government appointments and employment. The prevalent corruption was eventually called "Grantism."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulysses_S._Grant_presidential_administration_scandals
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

uppityperson

(116,026 posts)
1. Except for all those hurt or killed. Yes, there have been corrupt administrations
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 10:28 AM
Apr 2017

before. Sometimes they have resulted in positive change, sometimes not. It sucks for so many.

erinlough

(2,176 posts)
2. I agree. I was interested in how the situation was resolved.
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 10:33 AM
Apr 2017

The investigations have already started for us, Grant was not honestly investigated until his second term. The control in congress is the key.

uppityperson

(116,026 posts)
3. Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you were saying we survived before, we will again
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 10:37 AM
Apr 2017

Seeing history being made as an adult is very interesting and looking at the past, instructive.

world wide wally

(21,836 posts)
4. The difference between Grant and Trump is that Grant was a drunk who had periods of sobriety.
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 10:55 AM
Apr 2017

Trump is batshit crazy constantly.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We've been here before, a...