Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 06:56 PM Apr 2017

How many of you find it challenging to distinguish between "reality" and satire with this regime?

So I just read this post by Tommy Carcetti quoting the WaPo article about Trump's interview with FAUX regarding the chocolate cake thing, among other stuff:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8923802

I thought it was satire at first. Granted, I had just posted the latest Borowitz column, so had satire on my mind, but I honestly had to read all the way to the end of the quotes to Tommy's comments on the quotes before I could determine if it was satire or not.

I'm sure you've all read comments after a presser with Spicer or Trump that SNL could lift their statements verbatim and not have to write a script becasue they already read like satire. So this is not a new concept for any of us, but I have to say it was disconcerting to have to read clear through the quotes to the comments on the quotes to know if it was satire or not.

I could always tell when Obama was being satirical. Never had to wonder.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How many of you find it challenging to distinguish between "reality" and satire with this regime? (Original Post) Amaryllis Apr 2017 OP
It's a corollary to Poe's Law Warpy Apr 2017 #1
life is art and art is life Doreen Apr 2017 #2
There are good satirists and bad. The good ones are funny, that's how you know. Demit Apr 2017 #3
I have been fooled multiple times since January. RockCreek Apr 2017 #4

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
1. It's a corollary to Poe's Law
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 07:00 PM
Apr 2017

which says it's difficult to distinguish between religious parody and real religious insanity.

This one also contains the proviso that no matter how over the top the satire is today, the target will try to top it tomorrow.

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
2. life is art and art is life
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 07:00 PM
Apr 2017

Life is satire and satire is life.

Maybe that does not make sense but I understand it and it is how I feel with all of this crap.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
3. There are good satirists and bad. The good ones are funny, that's how you know.
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 07:13 PM
Apr 2017

The Onion writers, Andy Horowitz, what they write is clever and lets you in on the joke. They add something, it's not just a verbatim retelling of a circumstance. It's harder than people who try to do it think it is.

RockCreek

(739 posts)
4. I have been fooled multiple times since January.
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 07:25 PM
Apr 2017

Glad to hear I am not alone. Most recent was Borowitz at the New Yorker --Jared reading up on Middle East while waiting for ski lift in Aspen. Only thing that made me suspicious was the idea that he had to wait instead of getting a VIP pass past the line.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How many of you find it c...