Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it just me or does it feel like we no longer have civilian control over our military anymore? (Original Post) TeamPooka Apr 2017 OP
Trump doesn't get to be a puppet. tirebiter Apr 2017 #1
I said that the day of Operation Pothole Warpy Apr 2017 #2
For me, MyOwnPeace Apr 2017 #3
Historically the trick is always taking control back from the military at some point down the road. TeamPooka Apr 2017 #4
I agree........ MyOwnPeace Apr 2017 #6
I was thinking the other day how ironic it is that we're basically relying on the IC bailing us out Kentonio Apr 2017 #8
Given the choice between McMaster and Trump... Baconator Apr 2017 #16
Maybe Trump will give them enough power for a military coup. Ha ha ha... Kablooie Apr 2017 #5
And isn't that scarry? MyOwnPeace Apr 2017 #7
As a person from a military family, I think they will moderate Hamlette Apr 2017 #9
I don't think moderation means let's start using the biggest bomb we have that we have never used b4 TeamPooka Apr 2017 #11
I agree, but I have to at least hope they'll pull back. Hamlette Apr 2017 #12
As someone who has been there and done that... Baconator Apr 2017 #17
Trump thanks you for your support. TeamPooka Apr 2017 #18
The whole fucking program is out of control. VOX Apr 2017 #10
He said he gave them permission marlakay Apr 2017 #13
I think the USAF could bomb a city full of civilians and Trump would just be like: "The mission was TeamPooka Apr 2017 #15
What if the answer is civilian control in the form of all those for profit contractors for all PoliticalPie Apr 2017 #14
That bomb was used in accordance with a standing order. MineralMan Apr 2017 #19
We would either nuke them or have a full military coup on our hands. lose-lose TeamPooka Apr 2017 #21
Not a win-win situation in any way, is it? MineralMan Apr 2017 #22
I think Dear Leader has pretty much said "Knock yourselves out, guys." Vinca Apr 2017 #20
That's what I said!1 UTUSN Apr 2017 #23

tirebiter

(2,537 posts)
1. Trump doesn't get to be a puppet.
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:17 PM
Apr 2017

The commander in chief doesn't get to change the chain of command for his convenience.

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
2. I said that the day of Operation Pothole
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:20 PM
Apr 2017

The Joint Chiefs have been hot to go after Assad for years but Obama wouldn't do it without Congressional approval, something Asshole could likely have gotten had he tried.

But yes, between a pouting Ivanka and the Joint Chiefs, his arms were being twisted on that one.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
3. For me,
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:31 PM
Apr 2017

I'm thinking I'm more comfortable with the "military pros" than the "family administration" that's calling the plays now (not that either leaves me remotely comfortable!).

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
6. I agree........
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:40 PM
Apr 2017

and I remember Ike's warning about the MIC.
And that's what is crazy about now - who do you trust? Look at your choices!!!

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
8. I was thinking the other day how ironic it is that we're basically relying on the IC bailing us out
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:45 PM
Apr 2017

Either they provide the info to take down a president, or it won't happen. And now that's kind of a positive. Crazy world its become.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
5. Maybe Trump will give them enough power for a military coup. Ha ha ha...
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:35 PM
Apr 2017

Uh ... maybe it's not so funny.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
7. And isn't that scarry?
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:45 PM
Apr 2017

Really, have we ever been in this type of situation before?
My GAWD, I just argued for giving consideration to the "military" over a "civilian administration" (OMG - I'm about to throw up in my own throat - that's what this whole fraud administration has done to me!).

Really, we've gotta' do our work for 2018 - and make sure that GOOD people are in there!!!!!

Hamlette

(15,412 posts)
9. As a person from a military family, I think they will moderate
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:47 PM
Apr 2017

Husband, father and mother all served, all VERY liberal. While we should be keeping an eye on them, they will moderate when they realize a mad man is in the WH.

Most military types are used to presidents saying "no". If this guy never does, I honestly think cooler minds will prevail. My dad, a Col. in the airforce, would have freaked out at talk of using a nuclear weapon.

TeamPooka

(24,226 posts)
11. I don't think moderation means let's start using the biggest bomb we have that we have never used b4
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 10:22 PM
Apr 2017

VOX

(22,976 posts)
10. The whole fucking program is out of control.
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 09:55 PM
Apr 2017

Russian influenced election; right-wing ideologues in complete control of all branches of government; ignorance over knowledge and science; and a know-nothing, jerkoff cable huckster holds the highest office in the land.

marlakay

(11,468 posts)
13. He said he gave them permission
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 11:49 PM
Apr 2017

I think since he doesn't know anything he decided to trust them. Most presidents prefer to have the power and final say.

I heard him on the news talking about it.

TeamPooka

(24,226 posts)
15. I think the USAF could bomb a city full of civilians and Trump would just be like: "The mission was
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 12:38 AM
Apr 2017

a success. We have the best military, better than anyone, except for where we don't and we'll spend lots more money there."

 

PoliticalPie

(37 posts)
14. What if the answer is civilian control in the form of all those for profit contractors for all
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 12:03 AM
Apr 2017

materials, equipment and intelligence operations?

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
19. That bomb was used in accordance with a standing order.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 01:43 PM
Apr 2017

However, the "Civilian control of the military" means that the President and Congress are supposed to be in control of our military. Sadly, with the White House and Congress in Republican hands, that control is out of control at the moment. As far as Trump is concerned, we can only hope that the military will be able to control the Commander-in-Chief. That may be tested soon. If Trump orders the use of a nuclear weapon against North Korea, there will have to be some decisions made about what to do.

I will not say what I hope happens in that instance.

MineralMan

(146,311 posts)
22. Not a win-win situation in any way, is it?
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 02:16 PM
Apr 2017

Stay tuned. History may be about to be made. I hope I'm wrong.

Vinca

(50,273 posts)
20. I think Dear Leader has pretty much said "Knock yourselves out, guys."
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 01:46 PM
Apr 2017

He hasn't got a clue what the military has done, is doing or is planning to do.

UTUSN

(70,695 posts)
23. That's what I said!1
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 02:26 PM
Apr 2017
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028930585
Dereliction impeachment!1 He forfeited Cmdr-in-Chief duty, created a rogue military. Impeach!1

There's an article out there explaining that to MADISON and his cohorts "high" crimes and misdemeanors as grounds for impeachment refers to "maladministration" specifically in performance of official duties, not to "high" as in severity.

Not to say that this jerk with so many other serious infractions of ignorance, ethics, and fitness misses the mark of *severity* since here he is violating one of the bedrock principles, that the CIVILIANS are in control of the MILITARY.

Even a dweeb like Shrub showed some awareness of this by trying to legitimize himself by getting himself called Commander in Chief as often as possible.

As for this JERK's loosing the military to do as it will, first he called it "my" military, as Rachel?/Tweety? commented on at length, how he seems to believe it is his personal own thing, the way he tried to "give" exclusive rights to the inauguration to the Faux Propaganda Network, being ignorant that the military belongs to the country. And within the military at its best is the insidious kernel of Dr Strangelove, Catch 22, and the military's own self-awareness of FUBAR. It's only a step away from the Romans' praetorian guard running things, choosing emperors.

There is just plain LOTS of stuff to get this JERK out of here. If this institutional ROT were not so ingrained, some "high" (to use another meaning) minded members of the other branches would do their jobs.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it just me or does it ...