General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums1969 WAR protests, we didn't care one whit about Nixon's taxes, I was there
Just thinking here, when I protested the WAR in Berkeley in 1969/1970, I can tell you none of us cared one whit about Nixon's tax papers. Maybe we protested the wrong thing yesterday. I don't speak to any 2017 Repubs but I would bet they scoffed at us...as their leader said "I won, who cares? I'm President." To put it into perspective, we've got WAY bigger things to worry about today.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,911 posts)The don't stop us from other protests. There are good reasons why it is important to keep the precedent of Presidential candidates revealing their tax returns. Trump is the poster child for all of them. But just one; if we had his tax returns probably by now investigative journalists would have followed the leads to damning evidence of how Trump is fatally compromised by his previous business dealings.
P.S. I was there in 1969 also
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)is what I was getting at. Our Women's March was spectacular and scared the hell out of them. Yesterday I can tell you there were TWO in our entire state of Wisconsin. Kind of a blip on the R's radar. I am more concerned in not being bombed this Easter Day.
Foamfollower
(1,097 posts)SticksnStones
(2,108 posts)Seeing his returns - it's all part of the same battle to discover 45's allegiances, to know if his tax policies are meant to enrich him in particular, to know which foreign entities hold his IOUs.
The taxes aren't irrelevant, IMO. They're part of the fight to expose this fraud, this huckster, this traitor.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)To put it into perspective, things change.
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)Dirty as he was - Nixon didn't have the "taint" of back end deals with Russia.
There is no war. Those bombings happened to dodge, deflect and defer the collusion with Russia.
And this is why the I'm glad Perez is in charge. He's Gen X (like me) and probably holds the cynicism towards days gone past.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Were it not for a failure to report income, Spiro Agnew would have been our 41st president.
Demsrule86
(68,471 posts)we can not blindly follow it.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,155 posts)It proves absolutely nothing.
delisen
(6,042 posts)today income inequality is a massive problem.
Trump's financial conflicts of interest are a major issue, Nixon did not have those issues.
Voltaire2
(12,965 posts)dating back to 1969. His doing so established the precedent of presidential tax return transparency now being violated by twitler, and to his famous proclamation "well, I am not a crook".
csziggy
(34,131 posts)Aug 2, 2016 3:04 PM EDT
By Stephen Mihm
In 1952, when he ran as Dwight D. Eisenhowers vice-presidential candidate. Nixon, then a congressman, got into trouble for a secret campaign fund and divulged detailed information about his familys finances in response.
In his famous "Checkers speech," in which he painted himself as an American everyman struggling to make ends meet, Nixon called on the Democratic candidates for president and vice president -- Adlai Stevenson and John Sparkman -- to come before the American people, as I have, and make a complete financial statement as to their financial history." He added: "And if they dont, it will be an admission that they have something to hide."
Stevenson and Sparkman matched Nixons disclosures, but upped the ante. They released 10 years of returns, far more information than Nixon provided, and demanded that the Republican candidates do the same. In response, Eisenhower grudgingly released a summary of his tax returns, but refused to release the actual forms. Nixon, however, refused to release anything related to his taxes, renewing suspicions.
<SNIP>
But then things unraveled. The best account of Nixons tax travails comes from the historian Joseph Thorndike. Thanks to a deposition in a civil suit connected to the Watergate burglary in 1973, reporters learned that Nixon had taken a rather unusual tax break in 1969.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-08-02/nixon-s-failed-effort-to-withhold-his-tax-returns
Thorndike's account:
Joseph J. Thorndike
February 2016
<SNIP>
In the summer and fall of 1973, Nixon was engulfed by a controversy over his personal taxes. An outsize charitable donation was the proximate cause, but the scandal expanded to include numerous issues with the returns Nixon had filed between 1968 and 1972. The returns were private, of course, but a series of leaks, combined with informed speculation, gave critics plenty of ammunition. Nixon, it seemed, had played fast and loose with the revenue laws, exploiting his position to minimize taxes and avoid scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Nixons tax scandal actually prompted one of his most famous public statements, generally thought to refer to Wartergate. "People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook, he told reporters in November 1973. Well, I am not a crook."
<SNIP>
Swayed by such arguments, Congress had begun developing legislation in 1969 to limit the value of official paper donations. Attorneys for both Nixon and his predecessor, Lyndon Johnson, urged lawmakers to leave the window open just a bit longer. Nixon and Johnson even discussed the pending legislation directly with one another. Ultimately, however, the Tax Reform Act of 1969 nearly eliminated the deduction, providing specifically that donations made after July 25, 1969 would be limited to the cost of the paper on which the documents were produced.
As Congress moved toward limiting the deduction, Johnson chose not to make a gift before the deadline. Nixon, however, did rush one through. According to a high White House official speaking with The Washington Post
, the president had donated 1,176 boxes of papers on March 27, 1969. He subsequently claimed a deduction of somewhat over $500,000 on his 1969 tax return.
The complete paper is at: http://uschs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/USCHS-History-Role-Joint-Committee-Taxation-Thorndike.pdf
In the end it was determined that Nixon had not made a "valid gift before the July 25, 1969 deadline." The penalties and interest cost Nixon over half his net worth by the time he paid them.
Despite his own advice to politicians to be upfront with financial information, Nixon could not help but to be a crook.
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)WAR trumped that in 1969 is all I am saying.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)In fact it weakened the Democratic support to the point they lost in 1968 and Nixon got a landslide in 1972.
What got Nixon out was his coverup of illegal activities by his minions.
THAT is why Dolt45's cohorts' links to Russia are so important. And it is why Dolt's own links are essential. It is obvious they are all covering up stuff and we need to know what they are covering up.
Dolt45's tax returns and other financial records will be the ultimate evidence for what is going on - for the same reason the public needed to find out why the break-in at the Watergate was important.
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)IMPACT...did Trump roll over and hand them over today? No he is bombing and killing. Human beings.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)And they would not get Dolt45 out today.
Investigating the criminal acts of Dolt45 and his minions is our best chance of getting him out. Pressuring for access to the documents that can prove those wrong doing are our best chance. WE will not get them with the demonstrations but those demonstrations put pressure on our elected officials and on reporters to attempt to get them.
"It's the cover-up." and "Follow the money."are as true today as they were in 1972-3.
Squinch
(50,918 posts)This is not normal. He says no one cares. We showed that he is wrong.
Good for you in 1969. This is a different time.
And really? You give a shit what Republicans think about you? You have way bigger things to worry about than THAT!
Judi Lynn
(160,451 posts)jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)It will have no IMPACT. You may disagree with me, but I do think !! IQ 170.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)You aren't gonna dampen enthusiasm here. The marches will continue. IMPACT has already been made.
Link to tweet
struggle4progress
(118,236 posts)Midwestern Democrat
(806 posts)but when a man wins a national election in spite of not releasing his taxes, it seems rather useless to protest that fact - if the voters didn't care about it before the election, why would they care now?
Squinch
(50,918 posts)jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)1/2 hour of show over and she covered Korea, SNL, Spicey and Easter Egg Roll..not one peep on our Tax March...this is one of our GOOD shows...that is all I am saying...no IMPACT.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Perhaps yourself?
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)120 mins of Joy's show..not one mention...I don't need to convince anyone, there's your proof. If we're not covering it, no one is. IMPACT....
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)frankieallen
(583 posts)protesting Trumps tax returns seems petty compared to everything else going on. The right is having a chuckle this morning I'm afraid.
BannonsLiver
(16,313 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,313 posts)Time to close the yearbook.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,610 posts)of presidential candidates releasing their tax returns. In fact, it was because of Nixon that the custom started. The IRS audited Nixon in 1973 on account of some dodgy charitable contributions. That's when he agreed to release his returns, and when he said the famous line, "I am not a crook."
Trump's tax returns aren't the biggest deal, but they are still a big deal, especially considering that whatever he might be up to vis-a-vis Russia is probably financial.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)A lot harder to motivate millions constantly if there is no immediate threat to their lifestyles. So I consider these and other protests going on as triumphs.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)Mega businessman 'billionaire' whose financial dalliances and long-time connection to Russian business interests smacks of conflict of interest.
Not that it matters one whit either.
Our intelligence agencies have likely had their hands on those returns for a long, long time. They've probably assisted them in connecting the dots.
I don't care that I can't see those tax returns. I only care that the people who can use them to put this despicable felon behind bars for time immemorial.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I think it just makes us look even more powerless. He has no intention of releasing his returns, and these protests just give the right wing something more to chortle over.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)release their full tax returns.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I'm appalled where we are right now.
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)Y'know, like: WAR! TAXES!
blogslut
(37,985 posts)kentuck
(111,052 posts)Tax returns was not the most prominent issue.
But, with Trump, tax returns are more important to defining his character than they were with Nixon's character.
If there had been no war and no revolution going on, then taxes may have been a more important issue with Nixon?
rock
(13,218 posts)the more important it becomes that we see them - the Zaphod Beeblebrox conclusion: "... we really must be on to something if theyre trying to kill us."
Initech
(100,041 posts)stage left
(2,961 posts)That's evident as they're the first thing in his twitter feed this morning. That's good enough for me.
kentuck
(111,052 posts)Soros is starting his own job program, since the President does not have the capacity to do so, by paying all these people to march in protest against Trump? As if people would need to be paid to protest against his betrayal?
Incredible!
stage left
(2,961 posts)My check is way over due. Please remit.
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)Trump TWEETS? about all manner of trivia...he did not release his taxes. IMPACT.