Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEPA seeks public comment on scrapping regs
http://www.businessinsider.com/epa-public-comment-pollution-rules-2017-4It won't let me copy and paste, but the bottom line is that IL Drumpf can't just scrap environmental regs unilaterally. Changes require public comment. You know what to do.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 3850 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA seeks public comment on scrapping regs (Original Post)
The Blue Flower
Apr 2017
OP
demmiblue
(36,853 posts)1. Snip:
...
But revising or repealing a regulation that's already on the books isn't so simple. The EPA will have to go through the same arduous, months-long rulemaking process it used to create the regulations in the first place. And part of that process involves seeking comments from the public.
Now that process is underway.
The EPA has created a page on Regulations.gov where the public can comment. As of writing, it has already logged 1,268 comments, most of which appear to oppose repealing the air-quality regulations.
"The existing regulations are in place for a reason," one recent comment says. "They were enacted to fill a public need for clean water and air. Undoing these regulations is not in the public interest. Short term thinking and ignoring basic facts is sure way to be on the wrong side of history."
"Don't do this," another says.
The agency will also hold a teleconference from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. ET on April 24 members of the public will have the opportunity to weigh in. You can find more information on the EPA's regulatory reform process on its website.
But revising or repealing a regulation that's already on the books isn't so simple. The EPA will have to go through the same arduous, months-long rulemaking process it used to create the regulations in the first place. And part of that process involves seeking comments from the public.
Now that process is underway.
The EPA has created a page on Regulations.gov where the public can comment. As of writing, it has already logged 1,268 comments, most of which appear to oppose repealing the air-quality regulations.
"The existing regulations are in place for a reason," one recent comment says. "They were enacted to fill a public need for clean water and air. Undoing these regulations is not in the public interest. Short term thinking and ignoring basic facts is sure way to be on the wrong side of history."
"Don't do this," another says.
The agency will also hold a teleconference from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. ET on April 24 members of the public will have the opportunity to weigh in. You can find more information on the EPA's regulatory reform process on its website.
furtheradu
(1,865 posts)2. K & R..& thanks!
Yes, we know what to do!
Orrex
(63,212 posts)3. I'm sure that public opinion will be given a full and fair hearing
before Exxon proceeds to rewrite policy from the ground up.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,446 posts)4. The EPA has created a page on Regulations.gov....
The EPA has created a page on Regulations.gov where the public can comment. As of writing, it has already logged 1,268 comments, most of which appear to oppose repealing the air-quality regulations.
This Proposed Rule document was issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
For related information, Open Docket Folder
Hugin
(33,144 posts)5. Can we comment on how we think the current Secretary is trying to dismantle the EPA?
As verified by President Bannon's comments at the Krazed Klown Klub meeting awhile back.
And, how, exactly such a thing is legal?
Javaman
(62,530 posts)6. I put in my two cents.
Let's hope our voices are, you know, actually heard.