Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,075 posts)
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 07:02 PM Apr 2017

Trump Administration Position on Supreme Court Case Suggests Melania Trump Could Be Deported

Trump Administration Position on Supreme Court Case Suggests Melania Trump Could Be Deported
By Ben Mathis-Lilley


On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard a case involving a Serbian woman who was deported after it turned out she'd misrepresented a fact about her husband during the process of becoming an American citizen. The Trump administration argued to the court that not only was the woman in question's deportation defensible, but that any inaccuracy on official paperwork, even regarding the most trivial and "immaterial" issues, can justify deportation and the revocation of citizenship. It's a position that even conservative chief justice John Roberts found to be an extreme one. Via the New York Times:

“Some time ago, outside the statute of limitations, I drove 60 miles an hour in a 55-mile-an-hour zone,” the chief justice said, adding that he had not been caught.

The form that people seeking American citizenship must complete, he added, asks whether the applicant had ever committed a criminal offense, however minor, even if there was no arrest.

“If I answer that question no, 20 years after I was naturalized as a citizen, you can knock on my door and say, ‘Guess what, you’re not an American citizen after all’?” Chief Justice Roberts asked.

Robert A. Parker, a Justice Department lawyer, said the offense had to be disclosed. Chief Justice Roberts seemed shocked. “Oh, come on,” he said.


What's particularly interesting about the Trump administration supporting such an argument is that Melania Trump appears to have committed just such an omission on her own naturalization paperwork. In 2016, a lawyer representing Melania—a native of Slovenia who was naturalized in 2006—attested that he had reviewed her immigration documents and found no evidence that she had ever violated U.S. law. Later that year, however, the Associated Press uncovered records showing that she had in fact done paid modeling work for several weeks while she was staying in the U.S. in 1996 on a visitor visa, which would have been a violation of that visa's terms. If, as her lawyer's statement would appear to imply, Melania did not subsequently disclose this violation on other immigration documents, the Trump administration's current position would thus suggest she—the First Lady of the United States—is subject to deportation.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/04/27/trump_supreme_court_deportation_citizenship_argument_might_cover_melania.html
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Administration Position on Supreme Court Case Suggests Melania Trump Could Be Deported (Original Post) babylonsister Apr 2017 OP
I'll help her pack nt Phoenix61 Apr 2017 #1
As long as he's deported along with her nt meow2u3 Apr 2017 #12
I will buy the one way ticket. Wellstone ruled Apr 2017 #2
she has to fly coach crazycatlady Apr 2017 #10
Lol Lotusflower70 Apr 2017 #3
I chuckled at the John Roberts analogy. Very interesting to say the least. riversedge Apr 2017 #4
Roberts take on this is interesting malaise Apr 2017 #5
Well wearing this outfit certainly is a deportable fashion offense n2doc Apr 2017 #6
Is it an optical illusion ? Pluvious Apr 2017 #15
The horns and fangs really do add a creepy touch IMO struggle4progress Apr 2017 #16
she also lied about having a college degree. mopinko Apr 2017 #7
You know, I have to wonder if this is her way out of that marriage. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #8
I am conflicted about her. lapislzi Apr 2017 #11
I don't judge sex workers. But she knew she was going into in a very public ehrnst Apr 2017 #13
I smell a pardon coming whatever. BSdetect Apr 2017 #9
Kick. dalton99a Apr 2017 #14
Well, she did just turn 47. Nt Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2017 #17

malaise

(269,096 posts)
5. Roberts take on this is interesting
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 07:24 PM
Apr 2017

Never forget he and his wife adopted two children from Ireland. Down the line they could lose their citizen in the Con's world

Pluvious

(4,314 posts)
15. Is it an optical illusion ?
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 12:43 PM
Apr 2017

The longer you stare at her charming smile,
it begins to morph...

Try it for yourself !

mopinko

(70,150 posts)
7. she also lied about having a college degree.
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 07:40 PM
Apr 2017

my understanding is that she got in as a professional person, a designer, whatever. but she didnt have a degree.

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
11. I am conflicted about her.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 09:56 AM
Apr 2017

On the one hand, she's no dummy, and knew what she was getting into. She bet her chips on a loathsome toad and got what she paid for. On the other hand, it is likely that she is paying for it in ways she may not have expected. Being married to him must be a special hell all on its own. That does not, and will not ever, excuse her complicity.

As I'm not in the judging business, all I can do is sigh and watch things play out.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
13. I don't judge sex workers. But she knew she was going into in a very public
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:04 AM
Apr 2017

marriage with a serial adulterer.

He is her highest paying client, for sure, and I'm also sure that it is a particular hell to be legally owned by that john.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump Administration Posi...