Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lovemydogs

(575 posts)
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 06:08 PM Apr 2017

Two Minds About Obama Speaking at Wall Street Firm

I understand the anger. The feeling of betrayal over Obama speaking for a large fee to Wall Street.
I do not like this cozy crap with Wall Street by the Democratic Party Members.
Democrats need to back away from the Wall Street/big Corporate elbow rubbing.

But, thinking about it, I also understand why President Obama is doing it.

After 8 years in the White House he needs to restart a private life and what that entails.
He has his house in Chicago he would like to eventually return to.
He has his new house in Washington DC for a few years and the assorted expenses that come with caring for and furnishing it.
Sasha in Private School, where she has gone for 8 years.
Malia in Harvard.
Kick starting his new ventures in outreach to young people and the expenses of starting a new venture.
Obama and Michelle have quite a few expenses, have been out of public life for a long time and probably need some big cash, especially right away.
If I was someone important and needed money, big money fairly quick, I probably would think about doing a couple speeches for some fat cats while also having a chance to maybe talk to them about their role in rebuilding the country and the need for them to give back.

And I am no fan of the Fat Cats.

But, thinking on both sides, I can see it. I am coming down on neither side.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
2. Any links?
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 06:25 PM
Apr 2017

Or we just supposed to guess? BTW, Cantor Fitzgerald was the firm that lost hundreds of employees on 9-11

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
9. Yes, it was and it paid the widows and orphans and kept up their health insurance.
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 08:10 PM
Apr 2017

I deliberately did not provide links to the person who wrote the OP without knowing a thing about history.

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
6. Oh please so now a former Democratic president has to vet the companies he gives speeches to?
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 07:59 PM
Apr 2017

Completely ridiculous ...he owes nothing to any of you...he did his job and has returned to the private sector...how about you pick on the GOP for a while.

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
8. Not sure you are replying to me. I am sure Obama does more vetting of the folks he speaks to
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 08:07 PM
Apr 2017

than Drumpf did of his National Security Advisor (if he wasn't in on the whole thing from the get go).

4. I understand the outrage too, however I'm of the opinion that he's fine to do that
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 07:13 PM
Apr 2017

now that he's out of office. I have more of a problem with people doing this type of stuff while they're still in office or before running for office.

 

frankieallen

(583 posts)
11. I would comment, but it seems every time I chime in on this subject,
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 08:56 AM
Apr 2017

my posts are removed. So much for "discussion" on this discussion board.
So with that in mind.....no comment.

kentuck

(111,078 posts)
12. But, aren't they receiving about $40 million for a book deal?
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 08:59 AM
Apr 2017

Isn't that enough to pay off the bills?

Cha

(297,136 posts)
13. It's knee jerk outrage.. this is what the First Poster was referring
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 09:04 AM
Apr 2017

to..

Why Obama SHOULD Make That Speech - And Take The Paycheck For It Too

snip//

Cantor Fitzgerald survived both losing the largest single number of employees (658) of any company with offices in the World Trade Center on 9/11 and they also survived the financial crisis because they were NOT engaging in the same reckless behavior as the other financial firms (like Lehman, AIG, et al).

Moreover, Cantor Fitzgerald has done a great deal of philanthropic work in honor of their lost employees. Along with keeping a promise to use 25% of ALL profits they earned for the next 5 years to provide money to each of the original 658 families, they also promised to cover the health insurance costs for those families for 10 years. On top of this, they have continued the legacy of those lost employees, by making charitable donations to help the victims of Hurricane Sandy and of a huge tornado, as well as other acts of kindness.

So Obama, now a PRIVATE CITIZEN, is giving a speech to a firm that survived a horrible tragedy that has impacted life in America in uncountable ways ever since, and who turned their pain into positive action by not only taking care of their own, but helping others as well. They have also recovered as a company, avoided the worst behaviors that led to the 2008 financial crisis (actually profiting in a year when so many larger investment firms folded — and hiring when thousands were being laid off), and continue to invest in smart ways (one current project involves connecting people with their own local “mom & pop” shops).

Basically, Obama is being paid to give a speech to the ONE company on Wall Street that no one should be criticizing. Oh, and by the way — he’s giving this speech at their annual healthcare conference… a subject that Obama cares deeply about — and will forever be associated with since his signature healthcare legislation has been dubbed “Obamacare”. It’s also an issue that Cantor Fitzgerald championed even while still reeling from the losses they suffered on 9/11, by promising to cover the health care of the families of their lost employees for 10 years!!

More..
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/4/28/1657222/-Why-Obama-SHOULD-Make-That-Speech-And-Take-The-Paycheck-For-It-Too



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two Minds About Obama Spe...