Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pstokely

(10,523 posts)
Mon May 1, 2017, 02:31 AM May 2017

St. Louis region reflects the increased polarization in the U.S. House

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/st-louis-region-reflects-the-increased-polarization-in-the-u/article_f64720f0-c711-5964-bb61-72a287108712.html

"In 1997, when the Cook Political Report did its first Partisan Voter Index, 164 of the nation’s 435 congressional districts were electorally competitive. That is, they did not tilt more than 5 points Democrat or Republican.

But this year, only 72 districts are in that category. That means that only one out of six members of the so-called people’s House represents a district where he or she must equally try to satisfy people of different partisan beliefs in order to get re-elected.

The decline in competitive congressional districts is part of the reason why Congress can’t get big things done, experts say, an act typified by Friday’s vote to stave off shutting down the government with a stopgap, one-week funding bill.

Wasserman calls it “the incredible shrinking swing seat.”

He said that redrawing of boundary lines, often blamed for the increased polarization in Congress, is “only responsible for a small portion of this swing-seat decimation.” More of it is people’s decisions on where they live, Wasserman said.

“In many minimally altered districts, the electorate has simply become much more homogenous,” Wasserman reported. “Natural geographical sorting from election to election, much more than redistricting and gerrymandering, has driven the polarization of (congressional) districts over the last two decades.”"
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
St. Louis region reflects the increased polarization in the U.S. House (Original Post) pstokely May 2017 OP
Ok, do I understand this correctly? JNelson6563 May 2017 #1
It could see that being legit to a degree Lee-Lee May 2017 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #2

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
1. Ok, do I understand this correctly?
Mon May 1, 2017, 02:39 AM
May 2017

The biggest reason for the polarization is not the ridiculously gerrymandered districts that are re-drawn every 10 years. It is because of people moving into these districts because of how they vote?

I'm not buying it.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
3. It could see that being legit to a degree
Mon May 1, 2017, 06:36 AM
May 2017

In both the districts I live and work in you don't see young, progressive college educated people coming to the area. Instead you see them leaving got NYC,LA, lots are going to Memphis right now for some reason, Atlanta.

Moving in instead we have mostly old, white, retired types. Lots of them coming out of those same areas saying they want to escape the "high taxes" and "big government"

Response to pstokely (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»St. Louis region reflects...