Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:45 PM May 2017

What limits on speaking fees do you propose Obama should follow?

How much is the maximum compensation he should receive?

From whom should he accept them from?

Should these same limits apply to all former officeholders?

(As many here know, I don't propose any limits beyond what's legal, and certainly none that apply to Obama alone)

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What limits on speaking fees do you propose Obama should follow? (Original Post) CreekDog May 2017 OP
Sad Me. May 2017 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author rock May 2017 #22
Why should I care what he's paid? brooklynite May 2017 #2
You don't have to, of course, but for those that do, let's hear their proposals CreekDog May 2017 #5
The sky. He will leave the Nazi skinhead audiences to Drumpf. President Obama rzemanfl May 2017 #3
LOL didn't you hear Van Jones Thrill May 2017 #4
Yeah Lotusflower70 May 2017 #31
I think we can reach a reasonable compromise The Polack MSgt May 2017 #6
Snap frazzled May 2017 #18
The founding fathers would approve of such compromise. PdxSean May 2017 #24
Indeed The Polack MSgt May 2017 #46
Well.... LovingA2andMI May 2017 #27
TAH-DAH! You win the internet today. brush May 2017 #38
we have a winner GulfCoast66 May 2017 #42
Win CreekDog May 2017 #45
The minimum should be high enough that nobody will ever pay Trump more CreekDog May 2017 #7
None. No limit. If they pay, take it underpants May 2017 #8
None... LovingA2andMI May 2017 #9
I think all former officeholders can accept as much money as they want and speak to whomever they Nanjeanne May 2017 #10
I don't have an issue with a former President getting paid DefenseLawyer May 2017 #11
You have no idea what CF is about do you? brush May 2017 #40
I had heard that Reagan got $1 million from the Japanese Angry Dragon May 2017 #12
and he criticized the American worker in his speech delisen May 2017 #14
I do think I ever had heard that before ...... thanks Angry Dragon May 2017 #37
He should get as much as he can and speak to whatever group he wants NightWatcher May 2017 #13
If you restrict the payment a person receives for giving a speech then we need to restrict the Thinkingabout May 2017 #15
This is a fake controversy ginned up by trolls on Farcebook Warpy May 2017 #16
No limits brendacoupons May 2017 #17
He should take whatever they are willing to pay Motley13 May 2017 #19
No limit Renew Deal May 2017 #20
Jesus bittersweet Christ. ENOUGH WITH OBAMA'S SPEAKING FEES! Sculpin Beauregard May 2017 #21
The sky rock May 2017 #23
As far as I'm concerned, he'll always be underpaid for all he did for us, and moonscape May 2017 #25
Speak It, Tell That... LovingA2andMI May 2017 #29
Maybe around the amount greymattermom May 2017 #26
As a private citizen with no intentions of running for office again, there are no limits to impose. LonePirate May 2017 #28
Beyond the fact that it is none of our business .... MedusaX May 2017 #30
Let the market decide. lpbk2713 May 2017 #32
I think he should take what the market will bear. He'll probably do a lot more good shraby May 2017 #33
No limits on speaking fees. kentuck May 2017 #34
Let him take whatever the people he is speaking for are willing to pay. Doreen May 2017 #35
Wow just wow Lotusflower70 May 2017 #36
this is all bullshit. total bullshit. spanone May 2017 #39
How about a sense of propriety? Voltaire2 May 2017 #41
This isn't even really about "speaking fees" Blue_Tires May 2017 #43
No limits or formal policy loyalsister May 2017 #44

Response to Me. (Reply #1)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
5. You don't have to, of course, but for those that do, let's hear their proposals
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:49 PM
May 2017

That's what i want to know.

rzemanfl

(29,557 posts)
3. The sky. He will leave the Nazi skinhead audiences to Drumpf. President Obama
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:48 PM
May 2017

has scruples and I trust them.

Lotusflower70

(3,077 posts)
31. Yeah
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:22 PM
May 2017

And I would like to hear more about the poverty tour he was talking about. Calling it that seems insulting to me. Just what the he'll is up with Van Jones anyway? I normally love the guy but he has been annoying the hell out of me lately.

The Polack MSgt

(13,188 posts)
6. I think we can reach a reasonable compromise
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:49 PM
May 2017

How about three fifths what a white President can charge?

Just in case, because holy crap I'm gonna get alerted on...

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
27. Well....
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:17 PM
May 2017

Considering It Is Just One Barack Obama and 44 Other Presidents That In No Way Match Barack Obama's Melanin Count, some may believe the compromise is....reasonable (with is straight up BS by the way, as the only reason some are having an "issue" with Former POTUS Obama's Speaking Fee for this one speech gained his because he is African-American).

Sometimes the truth just needs to be said, Point, Blank, Period!

underpants

(182,788 posts)
8. None. No limit. If they pay, take it
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:51 PM
May 2017

This whole speech business is nonsense. Frankly (this isn't directed at you CreekDog) it reminds me of the Republicans and their press AND the rest of the press continually throwing a fit about what he did or didn't say. For 8 stinking years.

Nanjeanne

(4,959 posts)
10. I think all former officeholders can accept as much money as they want and speak to whomever they
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:52 PM
May 2017

want.

I also think that all voters can admire and defend those choices. Or be disappointed and not like their choices. Some people think it was a good move that Bush stayed out of the limelight and basically withdrew from politics. Others admire Jimmy Carter and his choice to set up the Carter Center and work for Habitat for Humanity, his work on voting rights and speaking out on racial and economic injustice. Some admire Bill Clinton and the creation of the Clinton Foundation.

Others may object to any and all of that. Doesn't mean that voters don't have a right to express their opinions on how it looks or what they wish their ex-Presidents would do.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
11. I don't have an issue with a former President getting paid
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:52 PM
May 2017

I guess in my Utopian world, Wall Street vultures wouldn't want to hear what my President had to say and he wouldn't want to give them the time of day. But it's not, and they do and he will. So there you go.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
13. He should get as much as he can and speak to whatever group he wants
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:53 PM
May 2017

He's out of office and beholden to no one.

Cash in, roll a fat joint, and enjoy retirement.

If he wants to start a charity, that'd be great too.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
15. If you restrict the payment a person receives for giving a speech then we need to restrict the
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:57 PM
May 2017

amount executives receive, the amount of money a professional sports player gets, this could go on and on. This is a bridge too far, next there will be a maximum amount all of us can receive, we are trying to get the minimum wages up, not place limits on them.

Warpy

(111,254 posts)
16. This is a fake controversy ginned up by trolls on Farcebook
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:57 PM
May 2017

Do you really think anybody at DU gives a shit that ex presidents make their money giving speeches and writing books until they get their lives back a few years down the line?

We've got worse problems. Stop wasting time on this garbage.

And no, I don't care that Sanders said a dumb thing in an unguarded moment. First, it wasn't that dumb and second, it's his opinion, not mine. He's entitled to one, you know.

brendacoupons

(15 posts)
17. No limits
Mon May 1, 2017, 03:57 PM
May 2017

No limits on how much or where.

He deserves to earn what the market will bear, and I trust him implicitly as to what he says and where he says it.

Motley13

(3,867 posts)
19. He should take whatever they are willing to pay
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:01 PM
May 2017

from anyone willing to pay that he is comfortable with.

I'm sure he will report it on his tax return

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
20. No limit
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:02 PM
May 2017

He's a private citizen now and he has a right to tell his story. If people want to pay, so be it.

Sculpin Beauregard

(1,046 posts)
21. Jesus bittersweet Christ. ENOUGH WITH OBAMA'S SPEAKING FEES!
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:03 PM
May 2017

This is trolling, because every goddamned fucking former pres who speaks commands high speaking fees! Bush, Clinton, all of them!

Fucking stop it!!!

When is Cheeto getting perp walked? Now THAT is news we fucking care about!

Fuck off talking about Obama's 'fees'

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
25. As far as I'm concerned, he'll always be underpaid for all he did for us, and
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:12 PM
May 2017

all he had to put up with.

LonePirate

(13,419 posts)
28. As a private citizen with no intentions of running for office again, there are no limits to impose.
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:18 PM
May 2017

Imposing a limit reeks of racism or communism.

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
30. Beyond the fact that it is none of our business ....
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:21 PM
May 2017

How absolutely fucking delightful is the
very real possibility
that those same $$$$$ monies will end up supporting Resistance efforts and
a myriad of social support programs
that the KGOP would like to do away with.....


It is not the possession of money nor its acquisition that is indicative of a lack of character.....
It is what one does with, or in order to obtain, those monies that separates the philanthropist from the aristocrat.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
33. I think he should take what the market will bear. He'll probably do a lot more good
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:24 PM
May 2017

with the money than the ones paying him.

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
34. No limits on speaking fees.
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:27 PM
May 2017

But I think the President must think of his legacy. What he gets paid is irrelevant, in my opinion. But, who he speaks to and what he says, is relevant.

If he speaks about healthcare and progressive issues, then there is no problem. But if he speaks to Big Banks and insurance executives and promotes their agenda over the people's agenda, then there may be a problem?

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
35. Let him take whatever the people he is speaking for are willing to pay.
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:27 PM
May 2017

He is working for his money. If you want to be angry at someone for taking money be angry at trump who screws people over for money and is stealing it from the American people. He is not working for his money. Leave Obama alone. Obama has done his time. You are wasting your energy you should be using to fight trump and his evil administration.

Lotusflower70

(3,077 posts)
36. Wow just wow
Mon May 1, 2017, 04:32 PM
May 2017

It is so fucking unbelievable that as a private citizen he is still getting grief. I don't think there is an issue with him doing whatever he wants.

Voltaire2

(13,023 posts)
41. How about a sense of propriety?
Mon May 1, 2017, 05:13 PM
May 2017

Don't just take the bucks, use each event as a way to build the Democratic Party message.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
43. This isn't even really about "speaking fees"
Mon May 1, 2017, 06:34 PM
May 2017

because mark my words, if Obama wasn't giving this speech the usual suspects would easily find some other bullshit issue to go to war over...

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
44. No limits or formal policy
Mon May 1, 2017, 07:24 PM
May 2017

But I admit it's bad form and criticism is unsurprising and possibly even justified. While Obama may have been asked without having been president the fact that he did serve as president, no doubt had a lot to do with the amount of money. Defending it leaves little room to criticize people who are willing to actually exploit the presidency to make money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What limits on speaking f...