General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat limits on speaking fees do you propose Obama should follow?
How much is the maximum compensation he should receive?
From whom should he accept them from?
Should these same limits apply to all former officeholders?
(As many here know, I don't propose any limits beyond what's legal, and certainly none that apply to Obama alone)
Response to Me. (Reply #1)
rock This message was self-deleted by its author.
brooklynite
(94,519 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)That's what i want to know.
rzemanfl
(29,557 posts)has scruples and I trust them.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Free.
Let us dictate how much you earn in your personal career
And I would like to hear more about the poverty tour he was talking about. Calling it that seems insulting to me. Just what the he'll is up with Van Jones anyway? I normally love the guy but he has been annoying the hell out of me lately.
The Polack MSgt
(13,188 posts)How about three fifths what a white President can charge?
Just in case, because holy crap I'm gonna get alerted on...
frazzled
(18,402 posts)That's about the long and short of it.
PdxSean
(574 posts)The Polack MSgt
(13,188 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Considering It Is Just One Barack Obama and 44 Other Presidents That In No Way Match Barack Obama's Melanin Count, some may believe the compromise is....reasonable (with is straight up BS by the way, as the only reason some are having an "issue" with Former POTUS Obama's Speaking Fee for this one speech gained his because he is African-American).
Sometimes the truth just needs to be said, Point, Blank, Period!
brush
(53,774 posts)Last edited Mon May 1, 2017, 10:36 PM - Edit history (1)
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)So much winning
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)To speak to them.
underpants
(182,788 posts)This whole speech business is nonsense. Frankly (this isn't directed at you CreekDog) it reminds me of the Republicans and their press AND the rest of the press continually throwing a fit about what he did or didn't say. For 8 stinking years.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Former POTUS is a PRIVATE CITIZEN and what he receives for Speaking Fees is his own business.
Nanjeanne
(4,959 posts)want.
I also think that all voters can admire and defend those choices. Or be disappointed and not like their choices. Some people think it was a good move that Bush stayed out of the limelight and basically withdrew from politics. Others admire Jimmy Carter and his choice to set up the Carter Center and work for Habitat for Humanity, his work on voting rights and speaking out on racial and economic injustice. Some admire Bill Clinton and the creation of the Clinton Foundation.
Others may object to any and all of that. Doesn't mean that voters don't have a right to express their opinions on how it looks or what they wish their ex-Presidents would do.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I guess in my Utopian world, Wall Street vultures wouldn't want to hear what my President had to say and he wouldn't want to give them the time of day. But it's not, and they do and he will. So there you go.
brush
(53,774 posts)Research it, not a Wall Street vulture firm.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)delisen
(6,043 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)He's out of office and beholden to no one.
Cash in, roll a fat joint, and enjoy retirement.
If he wants to start a charity, that'd be great too.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)amount executives receive, the amount of money a professional sports player gets, this could go on and on. This is a bridge too far, next there will be a maximum amount all of us can receive, we are trying to get the minimum wages up, not place limits on them.
Warpy
(111,254 posts)Do you really think anybody at DU gives a shit that ex presidents make their money giving speeches and writing books until they get their lives back a few years down the line?
We've got worse problems. Stop wasting time on this garbage.
And no, I don't care that Sanders said a dumb thing in an unguarded moment. First, it wasn't that dumb and second, it's his opinion, not mine. He's entitled to one, you know.
brendacoupons
(15 posts)No limits on how much or where.
He deserves to earn what the market will bear, and I trust him implicitly as to what he says and where he says it.
Motley13
(3,867 posts)from anyone willing to pay that he is comfortable with.
I'm sure he will report it on his tax return
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)He's a private citizen now and he has a right to tell his story. If people want to pay, so be it.
Sculpin Beauregard
(1,046 posts)This is trolling, because every goddamned fucking former pres who speaks commands high speaking fees! Bush, Clinton, all of them!
Fucking stop it!!!
When is Cheeto getting perp walked? Now THAT is news we fucking care about!
Fuck off talking about Obama's 'fees'
rock
(13,218 posts)Why should he be any different from anyone else?
moonscape
(4,673 posts)all he had to put up with.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Truth!!!
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)they spend to keep Melania in Trump Tower.
LonePirate
(13,419 posts)Imposing a limit reeks of racism or communism.
MedusaX
(1,129 posts)How absolutely fucking delightful is the
very real possibility
that those same $$$$$ monies will end up supporting Resistance efforts and
a myriad of social support programs
that the KGOP would like to do away with.....
It is not the possession of money nor its acquisition that is indicative of a lack of character.....
It is what one does with, or in order to obtain, those monies that separates the philanthropist from the aristocrat.
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)There's no reason why a diehard RWer should argue with that.
shraby
(21,946 posts)with the money than the ones paying him.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)But I think the President must think of his legacy. What he gets paid is irrelevant, in my opinion. But, who he speaks to and what he says, is relevant.
If he speaks about healthcare and progressive issues, then there is no problem. But if he speaks to Big Banks and insurance executives and promotes their agenda over the people's agenda, then there may be a problem?
Doreen
(11,686 posts)He is working for his money. If you want to be angry at someone for taking money be angry at trump who screws people over for money and is stealing it from the American people. He is not working for his money. Leave Obama alone. Obama has done his time. You are wasting your energy you should be using to fight trump and his evil administration.
Lotusflower70
(3,077 posts)It is so fucking unbelievable that as a private citizen he is still getting grief. I don't think there is an issue with him doing whatever he wants.
spanone
(135,830 posts)Voltaire2
(13,023 posts)Don't just take the bucks, use each event as a way to build the Democratic Party message.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)because mark my words, if Obama wasn't giving this speech the usual suspects would easily find some other bullshit issue to go to war over...
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)But I admit it's bad form and criticism is unsurprising and possibly even justified. While Obama may have been asked without having been president the fact that he did serve as president, no doubt had a lot to do with the amount of money. Defending it leaves little room to criticize people who are willing to actually exploit the presidency to make money.