General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe US Department of Justice is literally prosecuting a woman for laughing at Jeff Sessions
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/2/15518574/desiree-fairooz-justice-department
The US Department of Justice is literally prosecuting a woman for laughing at Jeff Sessions
As attorney general, Jeff Sessions now heads the Justice Department.
Updated by German Lopez@germanrlopezgerman.lopez@vox.com May 2, 2017, 2:30pm EDT
It is hard to believe this is happening, but its real: The US Department of Justice is literally prosecuting a woman for laughing at nowAttorney General Jeff Sessions during his Senate confirmation hearing earlier this year.
According to Ryan Reilly at HuffPost, Code Pink activist Desiree Fairooz was arrested in January after she laughed at a claim from Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) that Sessionss history of treating all Americans equally under the law is clear and well-documented.
Sessions, in fact, has a long history of opposing the equal treatment of all Americans under the law. He has repeatedly criticized the historic Voting Rights Act. He voted against hate crime legislation that protected LGBTQ people, arguing, Today, I'm not sure women or people with different sexual orientations face that kind of discrimination. I just don't see it. And his nomination for a position as a federal judge was rejected in the 1980s after he was accused of making racist remarks, including a supposed joke that he thought the Ku Klux Klan was okay until I found out they smoked pot.
Given this history, Fairooz laughed at Shelbys claim.
Link to tweet
But federal prosecutors have pushed forward with the case against Fairooz. As Reilly reported, prosecutors argue that the laugh amounted to willful disorderly and disruptive conduct intended to impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct of congressional proceedings. In court, they have tried to emphasize that the laugh was extraordinarily disruptive, with a US Capitol Police officer claiming that Fairooz laughed very loudly and people in the hearings turned around when they heard it.
Fairoozs defense, meanwhile, has argued that her laughter was a reflex and not meant to disrupt the hearings. Fairooz was also in the back of the room, and her laughter had no noticeable impact, based on video of the hearings, on Shelbys introductory speech for Sessions.
The trial will continue at the Superior Court in DC this week. If convicted, Fairooz faces a fine up to $500 and up to six months imprisonment for the laugh-related charge. She is also charged with another misdemeanor for allegedly parading, demonstrating or picketing within a Capitol, evidently for her actions after she was being escorted from the room, Reilly reported.
more...
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/2/15518574/desiree-fairooz-justice-department
onethatcares
(16,165 posts)we were supposed to be the snowflakes? These guys take the cake when it comes to hurt feelings.
Anybody got the number for the "Wahhhhhhhhmbulance"?
riversedge
(70,174 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)If you can do it to the President, a nominee has zero standing.
So much for equal justice under the law.
malaise
(268,844 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)Break out the brownshirts and armbands.
riversedge
(70,174 posts)JudyM
(29,225 posts)Freethinker65
(10,008 posts)Drop the charges
elleng
(130,821 posts)I was on a Federal jury in DC years ago, and tho jurors wanted to find the guy guilty (fraud re: 9/11-related scheme,) the prosecutor was inexperienced, so we couldn't convict.
elleng
(130,821 posts)WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)when she tells she is imprisoned for laughing.
SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I said, "And creating a nuisance."
And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench.
tblue37
(65,269 posts)right after one of the other guys on the Group W bench asked him, "Kid, what were you arrested for?" and he replied "Littering."
First thing I thought of when she was arrested for laughing.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,172 posts)is not to be laughed at, you hear?
However, farting in his general direction is still a misdemeanor, so long as it's not done so loudly as to wake him up.
lpbk2713
(42,750 posts)Small and desperate minds use intimidation as a tool.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I hope it fails.
Laughter is generally a reflex.
brer cat
(24,544 posts)iluvtennis
(19,843 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Clap her in irons, and assemble the tribunal!
2naSalit
(86,496 posts)dchill
(38,462 posts)More so, actually.
cstanleytech
(26,273 posts)bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,699 posts)in Baton Rouge - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10141765395
They have their priorities ya know!
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)orangecrush
(19,492 posts)And throw his freak show out on their ass with him.
C_U_L8R
(44,996 posts)Limpdicked Republican asshats reeeeeally cannot stand to laughed at... bwahahaha.
Y'all know what to do.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)So Sessions is following suit. And I have to wonder if the same thing would have happened to a white man if he laughed.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)I haven't been in the Senate Gallery since around ~1994/6 . I remember they were debating a telecomm bill and Barbara Boxer was introducing an amendment to require better scrambling of pay-per-view porn . (this was the analog TV days)
Anyway, even way back then, the Senate gallery was super strict on silence, both verbal and non-verbal such as making noises with a chair etc would get you kicked out. I saw several people escorted out for whispering to each other. It was pretty intimidating.
This was back in the days when you could just wander around the Capital Building at will without an escort or tour group.
Given the climate today, I'm surprised that she wasn't tazzed or worse, especially when she was yelling.
My guess is that actual charge is probably disorderly conduct, or maybe something heightened like "disrupting congress" if such a law exists.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)IronLionZion
(45,403 posts)If it pleases the crown, we shall skip the trial. prepare the gallows! call the executioner!
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,560 posts)the ACLU!
thesquanderer
(11,982 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)It's ALWAYS OKIYAR.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)Update, May 3 at 4:15 pm: According to Reilly at HuffPost, a jury convicted Fairooz on both charges against her.
But jurors told Reilly that they didnt focus on the moment Fairooz laughed, but rather what happened after she laughed. When a US Capitol Police officer tried to remove her from the hearings for laughing, she allegedly began to loudly protest and appeared to hold up a sign that she had brought up to the hearings.
She did not get convicted for laughing. It was her actions as she was being asked to leave, the jury foreperson said. We did not agree that she should have been removed for laughing.
Some jurors complained that the law is so broad that it forced them to convict. One said, Theres almost no way that you can find them not guilty.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)dictator as an alleged potus and a virulently hateful white racist is appointed to safeguard the rights of all americans as AG of the dictators ameriKKKa. FTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!