Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,042 posts)
Tue May 2, 2017, 03:26 PM May 2017

The US Department of Justice is literally prosecuting a woman for laughing at Jeff Sessions




https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/2/15518574/desiree-fairooz-justice-department

The US Department of Justice is literally prosecuting a woman for laughing at Jeff Sessions
As attorney general, Jeff Sessions now heads the Justice Department.
Updated by German Lopez@germanrlopezgerman.lopez@vox.com May 2, 2017, 2:30pm EDT



It is hard to believe this is happening, but it’s real: The US Department of Justice is literally prosecuting a woman for laughing at now–Attorney General Jeff Sessions during his Senate confirmation hearing earlier this year.

According to Ryan Reilly at HuffPost, Code Pink activist Desiree Fairooz was arrested in January after she laughed at a claim from Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) that Sessions’s history of “treating all Americans equally under the law is clear and well-documented.”

Sessions, in fact, has a long history of opposing the equal treatment of all Americans under the law. He has repeatedly criticized the historic Voting Rights Act. He voted against hate crime legislation that protected LGBTQ people, arguing, “Today, I'm not sure women or people with different sexual orientations face that kind of discrimination. I just don't see it.” And his nomination for a position as a federal judge was rejected in the 1980s after he was accused of making racist remarks, including a supposed joke that he thought the Ku Klux Klan “was okay until I found out they smoked pot.”

Given this history, Fairooz laughed at Shelby’s claim.




But federal prosecutors have pushed forward with the case against Fairooz. As Reilly reported, prosecutors argue that “the laugh amounted to willful ‘disorderly and disruptive conduct’ intended to ‘impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct’ of congressional proceedings.” In court, they have tried to emphasize that the laugh was extraordinarily disruptive, with a US Capitol Police officer claiming that Fairooz laughed “very loudly” and people in the hearings turned around when they heard it.

Fairooz’s defense, meanwhile, has argued that her laughter was a reflex and not meant to disrupt the hearings. Fairooz was also in the back of the room, and her laughter had no noticeable impact, based on video of the hearings, on Shelby’s introductory speech for Sessions.

The trial will continue at the Superior Court in DC this week. If convicted, Fairooz faces a fine up to $500 and up to six months’ imprisonment for the laugh-related charge. She is also charged with another misdemeanor for “allegedly parading, demonstrating or picketing within a Capitol, evidently for her actions after she was being escorted from the room,” Reilly reported.

more...

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/2/15518574/desiree-fairooz-justice-department
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US Department of Justice is literally prosecuting a woman for laughing at Jeff Sessions (Original Post) babylonsister May 2017 OP
i thught onethatcares May 2017 #1
OMG!! and Joe Wilson goes free for yelling LIAR!! riversedge May 2017 #2
Isn't that a legal precident? SCVDem May 2017 #38
They are fascists n/t malaise May 2017 #3
And so it begins. DK504 May 2017 #31
Doesn't the DOJ have better things to do. ?? Jeff-where is your sense of humor? riversedge May 2017 #4
Our tax dollars at work, under this administration. JudyM May 2017 #34
PR nightmare for the justice dept. Freethinker65 May 2017 #5
Right. Many of them probably don't want to prosecute. elleng May 2017 #7
I doubt this charge will get far with a jury in DC. elleng May 2017 #6
Can you imagine the reactions of her cell mates WhiteTara May 2017 #8
...and they all moved away from me on the bench there, SeattleVet May 2017 #13
lol WhiteTara May 2017 #20
Is that from "Alice's Restaurant" ? nt tblue37 May 2017 #24
Yes SeattleVet May 2017 #30
Jefferson P.G.T. Beauregard Robert E. Keebler Elf Sessions III Buns_of_Fire May 2017 #9
"If I can't have your respect then I'll have your fear." lpbk2713 May 2017 #10
Well put treestar May 2017 #25
And that nails it. nt brer cat May 2017 #28
Laughing at someone is part of our 1st Amendment rights...GAAAAH iluvtennis May 2017 #11
I hear tell the laughter of a nasty woman can render a Godly man impotent!! ehrnst May 2017 #12
I call that a public service! ...nt 2naSalit May 2017 #18
If money is speech, then so is laughing. dchill May 2017 #14
I hope she wins and then sues him for malicious prosecution. nt cstanleytech May 2017 #15
Ain't no way a jury convicts. bronxiteforever May 2017 #16
Yet they are refusing to prosecute the cops who killed Alton Sterling BumRushDaShow May 2017 #17
+1 dalton99a May 2017 #26
Impeach Trump orangecrush May 2017 #19
Let the ridicule begin C_U_L8R May 2017 #21
McConnell did it to Warren ProudLib72 May 2017 #22
I don't know what it's like today, but I remember the Senate Gallery is incredibly strict fescuerescue May 2017 #23
The KGOPee Laugh Police are on the hunt for Laughers Achilleaze May 2017 #27
loud female laughter is among the worst offenses IronLionZion May 2017 #29
Another reason to support Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2017 #32
Protocol. She was supposed to yell out "You lie!" (n/t) thesquanderer May 2017 #33
That's quite a double-standard, isn't it? FiveGoodMen May 2017 #35
Updated today cannabis_flower May 2017 #36
what happens with a heaven05 May 2017 #37

onethatcares

(16,165 posts)
1. i thught
Tue May 2, 2017, 03:30 PM
May 2017

we were supposed to be the snowflakes? These guys take the cake when it comes to hurt feelings.

Anybody got the number for the "Wahhhhhhhhmbulance"?

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
38. Isn't that a legal precident?
Thu May 4, 2017, 09:16 PM
May 2017

If you can do it to the President, a nominee has zero standing.

So much for equal justice under the law.

elleng

(130,821 posts)
7. Right. Many of them probably don't want to prosecute.
Tue May 2, 2017, 03:54 PM
May 2017

I was on a Federal jury in DC years ago, and tho jurors wanted to find the guy guilty (fraud re: 9/11-related scheme,) the prosecutor was inexperienced, so we couldn't convict.

SeattleVet

(5,477 posts)
13. ...and they all moved away from me on the bench there,
Tue May 2, 2017, 05:18 PM
May 2017

and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I said, "And creating a nuisance."
And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench.

SeattleVet

(5,477 posts)
30. Yes
Wed May 3, 2017, 12:42 PM
May 2017

right after one of the other guys on the Group W bench asked him, "Kid, what were you arrested for?" and he replied "Littering."

First thing I thought of when she was arrested for laughing.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,172 posts)
9. Jefferson P.G.T. Beauregard Robert E. Keebler Elf Sessions III
Tue May 2, 2017, 04:56 PM
May 2017

is not to be laughed at, you hear?

However, farting in his general direction is still a misdemeanor, so long as it's not done so loudly as to wake him up.

lpbk2713

(42,750 posts)
10. "If I can't have your respect then I'll have your fear."
Tue May 2, 2017, 05:01 PM
May 2017



Small and desperate minds use intimidation as a tool.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
12. I hear tell the laughter of a nasty woman can render a Godly man impotent!!
Tue May 2, 2017, 05:08 PM
May 2017

Clap her in irons, and assemble the tribunal!

C_U_L8R

(44,996 posts)
21. Let the ridicule begin
Tue May 2, 2017, 11:21 PM
May 2017

Limpdicked Republican asshats reeeeeally cannot stand to laughed at... bwahahaha.
Y'all know what to do.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
22. McConnell did it to Warren
Wed May 3, 2017, 12:06 AM
May 2017

So Sessions is following suit. And I have to wonder if the same thing would have happened to a white man if he laughed.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
23. I don't know what it's like today, but I remember the Senate Gallery is incredibly strict
Wed May 3, 2017, 01:58 AM
May 2017

I haven't been in the Senate Gallery since around ~1994/6 . I remember they were debating a telecomm bill and Barbara Boxer was introducing an amendment to require better scrambling of pay-per-view porn . (this was the analog TV days)

Anyway, even way back then, the Senate gallery was super strict on silence, both verbal and non-verbal such as making noises with a chair etc would get you kicked out. I saw several people escorted out for whispering to each other. It was pretty intimidating.

This was back in the days when you could just wander around the Capital Building at will without an escort or tour group.

Given the climate today, I'm surprised that she wasn't tazzed or worse, especially when she was yelling.

My guess is that actual charge is probably disorderly conduct, or maybe something heightened like "disrupting congress" if such a law exists.

IronLionZion

(45,403 posts)
29. loud female laughter is among the worst offenses
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:19 AM
May 2017

If it pleases the crown, we shall skip the trial. prepare the gallows! call the executioner!

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
36. Updated today
Wed May 3, 2017, 06:46 PM
May 2017

Update, May 3 at 4:15 pm: According to Reilly at HuffPost, a jury convicted Fairooz on both charges against her.

But jurors told Reilly that they didn’t focus on the moment Fairooz laughed, but rather what happened after she laughed. When a US Capitol Police officer tried to remove her from the hearings for laughing, she allegedly began to loudly protest and appeared to hold up a sign that she had brought up to the hearings.

“She did not get convicted for laughing. It was her actions as she was being asked to leave,” the jury foreperson said. “We did not agree that she should have been removed for laughing.”

Some jurors complained that the law is so broad that it forced them to convict. One said, “There’s almost no way that you can find them not guilty.”

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
37. what happens with a
Thu May 4, 2017, 11:36 AM
May 2017

dictator as an alleged potus and a virulently hateful white racist is appointed to safeguard the rights of all americans as AG of the dictators ameriKKKa. FTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The US Department of Just...