Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Comey is moving towards declaring indictments. Grand Juries are there. Impeachment. (Original Post) L. Coyote May 2017 OP
What a terrible shame MFM008 May 2017 #1
"Comey neither wants nor needs a Special Prosecutor." - he indicated yesterday he was working... PoliticAverse May 2017 #2
I think you meant "indicated" in your title. MineralMan May 2017 #3
Yes left out the a, thanks. n/t PoliticAverse May 2017 #5
he doesn't want a special prosecutor interfering with the cover up certainot May 2017 #21
I think Ms. Mensch is confused here. MineralMan May 2017 #4
Yeah Cosmocat May 2017 #6
She seems to be rather sloppy in her pronouncements. MineralMan May 2017 #8
You are certainly correct, but as a practical matter DefenseLawyer May 2017 #12
Nothing normal about this situation, either. MineralMan May 2017 #14
That's certainly true in most cases... FBaggins May 2017 #28
But in most cases that person hasn't spent months dissing all the US intelligence agencies pnwmom May 2017 #60
That wouldn't matter for prosecution purposes FBaggins May 2017 #64
Sessions has recused himself. The new guy might be willing to buck the President. We'll see. nt pnwmom May 2017 #67
Plus, she referred to the fact that Comey has confirmed there are federal prosecutors involved. pnwmom May 2017 #59
I am happy she's(Mensch) getting people involved awesomerwb May 2017 #10
She was right. She mentioned the Grand Juries in that tweet. She knows the FBI doesn't indict.nt pnwmom May 2017 #61
She didn't stumble. She specifically mentioned Grand juries. She knows that they can indict, pnwmom May 2017 #58
She knows there are grand juries working. Don't confuse no special prosecutor and no prosecution. L. Coyote May 2017 #11
"She knows" or she claims to know? awesomerwb May 2017 #13
Here, watch this SticksnStones May 2017 #46
Claude Taylor, who has worked for Bill Clinton and been involved in 3 campaigns, pnwmom May 2017 #62
I expect is twitterish short for "will recommend indictments" to the grand juries. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #39
No, she understands. This is what she said: pnwmom May 2017 #57
He would be gone tomorrow... kentuck May 2017 #7
Sealed Complaints as well. MelissaB May 2017 #9
The constant tease is just painful FiveGoodMen May 2017 #15
I know, right?! demmiblue May 2017 #18
I will believe it when I see it! mfcorey1 May 2017 #16
That's what I think, too. janterry May 2017 #52
wonder if this is why repugcare is being rushed through. n/t. okieinpain May 2017 #17
Team Trump charged at state level no pardons. L. Coyote May 2017 #19
Someone please explain these tweets Blue_Roses May 2017 #23
Anyone convicted by the State of NY, or any state, cannot be pardoned by the President. L. Coyote May 2017 #24
Got it Blue_Roses May 2017 #25
Putin will put a stop to it elmac May 2017 #20
Republicans aren't going to impeach one of their own benpollard May 2017 #22
They might itcfish May 2017 #30
If They Fear They'll Go Down With The Ship, They Will ChoppinBroccoli May 2017 #33
Never underestimate the stupidity of the American voter benpollard May 2017 #69
Olbermann is now discussing fed grand juries and Comey sharedvalues May 2017 #26
VIDEO: Is a Grand Jury Now Looking into Trump? L. Coyote May 2017 #31
Thanks for that.. got to see my Senator Hirono on Cha May 2017 #36
Seeing would be believing for me get the red out May 2017 #27
Who or What is GJ? itcfish May 2017 #29
Grand jury lunasun May 2017 #32
Duh! itcfish May 2017 #34
A grand jury Volaris May 2017 #35
Make that THREE confirmed grand juries are now empaneled. Thirty-some indictments? L. Coyote May 2017 #37
Remember Fitzmas? mn9driver May 2017 #38
I remember Fitzmas Catherine Vincent May 2017 #51
Or....24 business hours frankieallen May 2017 #55
No deals, no pardons, no parole. BSdetect May 2017 #40
We can see the pressure is mounting because Trump is squirming more oasis May 2017 #41
We can see the pressure is mounting because Trump is squirming more. LenaBaby61 May 2017 #53
I refuse to be interested until it actually happens. Coventina May 2017 #42
What gives this Claude guy credibility? snooper2 May 2017 #43
Same as Woodward and Bernstein. The truth in print. L. Coyote May 2017 #45
Comey testimony as to Eastern District DOES MEAN and DOES confirm he is trying to bring charges L. Coyote May 2017 #44
Blahblahblahblahblah - when AFP, and Deutsche Welle and the Guardian have it, I'll believe it . . . hatrack May 2017 #47
New Olbermann‏ VIDEO: Comey confirms? - VA Grand Jury impaneled - #TrumpRussia L. Coyote May 2017 #48
I wont get my hopes up. I fully expect a report to be released in October 2018 saying chelsea0011 May 2017 #49
Right around the 26th, 27th, I'm sure hatrack May 2017 #50
Senate Asks Trump Associates for Records of Communication With Russians L. Coyote May 2017 #54
The Senate Intelligence Committee Letter L. Coyote May 2017 #56
Screwball Russian Agent Carter Page is playing "victim" now. Sends bazaar letter to Senate L. Coyote May 2017 #66
"I was illegally wiretapped and unmasked" L. Coyote May 2017 #71
Just the usual megalomania. ucrdem May 2017 #63
Comey refuses to say FBI has ruled out Trump L. Coyote May 2017 #65
smells a lot like Fitzmas 0rganism May 2017 #68
I don't trust Comey. I consider him part of Putin's gang. LiberalFighter May 2017 #70
On cable programming today: Malcolm Nance with Joy Reid. L. Coyote May 2017 #72

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. "Comey neither wants nor needs a Special Prosecutor." - he indicated yesterday he was working...
Thu May 4, 2017, 12:20 PM
May 2017

with 2 sets of prosecutors so apparently he doesn't need the appointment of a Special Prosecutor at this time.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
3. I think you meant "indicated" in your title.
Thu May 4, 2017, 12:27 PM
May 2017

Comey can't indict anyone. That is not within his power. You might want to edit your title.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
21. he doesn't want a special prosecutor interfering with the cover up
Thu May 4, 2017, 02:58 PM
May 2017

is the way these things usually work

whatever happens it will take forever and a few people will get thrown under the bus and be sent to tennis camp to save the republican party - and they'll probably try to implicate some obama people in it

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
4. I think Ms. Mensch is confused here.
Thu May 4, 2017, 12:29 PM
May 2017

The FBI does not indict anyone. It cannot. That is reserved for the Justice Department. The FBI only investigates and makes recommendations. No indictment can issue from Comey or the FBI.

If she does not understand that, I have to wonder how well she understands any of it.

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)
6. Yeah
Thu May 4, 2017, 12:34 PM
May 2017

I lean toward thinking she is wired in a bit, but it does give you pause when she stumbles on rather basic technical aspects like this ...

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
8. She seems to be rather sloppy in her pronouncements.
Thu May 4, 2017, 12:37 PM
May 2017

That always makes me question her actual understanding of what she says. When you tweet, you have to choose your words very carefully, due to the brevity imposed by Twitter.

She doesn't do that. Too bad.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
12. You are certainly correct, but as a practical matter
Thu May 4, 2017, 01:38 PM
May 2017

you would be hard pressed to find a single instance in the history of the country where the FBI director wanted someone indicted and that didn't happen. So normally, when the FBI wants someone indicted, it happens. 100% of the time. However, there is nothing normal about this Justice Department, so in this case, I wouldn't assume anything.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
14. Nothing normal about this situation, either.
Thu May 4, 2017, 01:45 PM
May 2017

The political ramifications take it right out of the norm. In my opinion, Comey should not be the FBI Director, and should have been removed for interfering with an election last year. That he was not was a mistake on Obama's part, I think.

Everything is in a cocked hat right now. I don't know how it's all going to end up.

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)
28. That's certainly true in most cases...
Fri May 5, 2017, 08:57 AM
May 2017

...But in most cases, the prosecutors don't work for the person that the FBI wants to indict.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
60. But in most cases that person hasn't spent months dissing all the US intelligence agencies
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:45 PM
May 2017

and the FBI.

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)
64. That wouldn't matter for prosecution purposes
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:58 PM
May 2017

Because intelligence agencies lack prosecutorial powers (absent a DOJ decision to the contrary). Trump isn't going to dis his own DOJ. You would need an AG who was willing to buck the president (and likely then get fired).

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
59. Plus, she referred to the fact that Comey has confirmed there are federal prosecutors involved.
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:43 PM
May 2017

Wouldn't that be significant?

awesomerwb

(139 posts)
10. I am happy she's(Mensch) getting people involved
Thu May 4, 2017, 12:44 PM
May 2017

However I'm not subjecting myself to the ups and downs I would imagine reading her tweets. Elation to disappointment.

I hope someone corrects her on this soon.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
58. She didn't stumble. She specifically mentioned Grand juries. She knows that they can indict,
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:42 PM
May 2017

not the FBI.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
11. She knows there are grand juries working. Don't confuse no special prosecutor and no prosecution.
Thu May 4, 2017, 01:28 PM
May 2017

The confusion seems to be yours.

awesomerwb

(139 posts)
13. "She knows" or she claims to know?
Thu May 4, 2017, 01:45 PM
May 2017

Not trying to start argument or anything, what I saw about Comey yesterday doesn't give me much hope he wants to get to the bottom of this.

I hope I'm wrong of course.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
62. Claude Taylor, who has worked for Bill Clinton and been involved in 3 campaigns,
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:51 PM
May 2017

wrote that there were 2 Grand Juries investigating Russia/Trump matters. Then Comey said in the hearing that there were two prosecutors "coordinating" with the FBI -- which seems to confirm what Taylor has been hearing.

Mensch has been retweeting some of Taylor's tweets and he's been confirming some of hers. They have different sources, but their sources info seems to correlate. Also, Rick Wilson is a Republican operative, another never-trumper, who has sources that confirm some of Taylor and Mensch's reports.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,001 posts)
39. I expect is twitterish short for "will recommend indictments" to the grand juries.
Fri May 5, 2017, 10:12 AM
May 2017

I expect she is not confused on the question of who actually indicts.

Grand juries are not free ranging over the landscape looking for somebody, anybody, to indict. They work from lists from the prosecutors who work from lists backed by evidence produced by law enforcement personnel such as the FBI.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
57. No, she understands. This is what she said:
Fri May 5, 2017, 05:41 PM
May 2017

"Guys, James Comey is moving towards declaring indictments. Grand Juries are there."

See how she references Grand Juries? She knows that GJ's are the ones who issue indictments.

And in earlier tweets, she discussed with people the legal question of the significance of grand juries and the likelihood of indictments.

 

janterry

(4,429 posts)
52. That's what I think, too.
Fri May 5, 2017, 12:44 PM
May 2017

It would be a great day (my town would dance in the streets).

But I'll wait until it happens. I'm not going to get my hopes up.................

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
24. Anyone convicted by the State of NY, or any state, cannot be pardoned by the President.
Thu May 4, 2017, 07:13 PM
May 2017

NY AG Schneidermann may file charges against trump and others.

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
20. Putin will put a stop to it
Thu May 4, 2017, 02:51 PM
May 2017

show Comey in a golden shower film with tRump or something like that. Anyway, too late, we have a fascist in office no matter who gets kicked out. Criminals are in charge, nothing will change.

itcfish

(1,828 posts)
30. They might
Fri May 5, 2017, 09:03 AM
May 2017

They got most of the agenda through with Trump's EOs, the repealed Obamacare. McConnel will probably pull some dirty trick and get Trumpcare passed in the Senate. Their job is done, they don't need Trump anymore. It would have be impeach Trump/Pence, his whole administration, McConnel and Ryan and void all of his EOs and that will never happen and I don't even know if that is possible.

ChoppinBroccoli

(3,784 posts)
33. If They Fear They'll Go Down With The Ship, They Will
Fri May 5, 2017, 09:43 AM
May 2017

When it starts getting close to the 2018 elections, and the Republicans start seeing their poll numbers go into the tank due to their being tied to Trump, they'll do anything to save their oily hides. They will vote to impeach so they can go campaign in their home districts on, "I know you guys hate Trump. I do too. Lookie, I voted to impeach him! I'm just like you! Vote for me again!"

I can't possibly be the only person who remembers 2008. The country was SO anti-Bush that anyone tied to him got swept out of office. Democrats won political offices all over the nation just because the country was so sick and tired of Bush and the lapdogs who enabled him. I see a similar phenomenon coming in 2018. And any Republicans who remember that as well will start distancing themselves from Trump as soon as they see THEIR numbers start to dip.

Also, for as many Republicans as there were during the primaries saying they would never support Trump, I can't believe there hasn't been some movement to get him out of there and get Pence in. Pence is seen as "one of them." Why do they continue to put up with Trump killing their "brand" when they can get "one of their own" into his position easily? Doesn't make sense to me.

At the end of the day, Republicans are spineless, so we may not get full-fledged impeachment until Democrats re-take the Congress in 2018, but I feel confident we'll ride this assclown currently squatting in our White House out on a rail before his term is up.

benpollard

(199 posts)
69. Never underestimate the stupidity of the American voter
Sat May 6, 2017, 12:45 PM
May 2017

Just two years after the Bush disaster ended, Republicans regained control of the House.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
26. Olbermann is now discussing fed grand juries and Comey
Fri May 5, 2017, 08:26 AM
May 2017
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029019140

These crimes will be exposed and sooner or later the mainstream press will report them.

Even our for profit infotainment press will love to discuss a trainwreck of indictments. Get ready.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
32. Grand jury
Fri May 5, 2017, 09:40 AM
May 2017

a jury, normally of twenty-three jurors, selected to examine the validity of an accusation before trial.

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
35. A grand jury
Fri May 5, 2017, 09:47 AM
May 2017

Is a court operation in which evidence is put before the court to determine if that evidence will support charging someone(s) with a crime. If yes, charges are filed.
If no, everybody goes home. Because of the possibility of either being the case, grand juries and the evidence they consider are usually sealed until a decision is made.

Grand Juries don't file charges of their own volition, they just make recommendations to charge with crimes or not.

But if someone (either State AG or feds) put that information to a court TO MAKE SURE they're not wrong in what they're seeing or how to proceed if they are wrong (go get evidence of X, because this ain't enough) it means someone wants their shit together so that WHEN charges get filed, that's an airtight case and NOBODY goes home.

I'm not a lawyer.

mn9driver

(4,425 posts)
38. Remember Fitzmas?
Fri May 5, 2017, 10:02 AM
May 2017

I do. I'll get excited when I see indictments and impeachment hearings.

Until then, it's all bullshit.

oasis

(49,381 posts)
41. We can see the pressure is mounting because Trump is squirming more
Fri May 5, 2017, 10:14 AM
May 2017

nowadays. He's receiving hints of these reports through his channels.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
53. We can see the pressure is mounting because Trump is squirming more.
Fri May 5, 2017, 02:59 PM
May 2017

It's difficult to really see if/when he's squirming.

It's a SAFE bet to say that he's suffering from some form of mental deterioration, and it gets WORSE seemingly as each new day unfolds. There's still enough of him there currently to make him the biggest most ridiculous, self-aggrandizing, narcissistic, lying, racist, sexist, misogynistic con-man on the planet. But at times, and with the way mental deterioration works for someone like him, I'm sure he's not all there--he's in his OWN little tRumputin world, which is an extremely frightening place to BE

Coventina

(27,115 posts)
42. I refuse to be interested until it actually happens.
Fri May 5, 2017, 10:17 AM
May 2017

And even then, unless Pence is removed as well, it may do more harm than good.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
43. What gives this Claude guy credibility?
Fri May 5, 2017, 10:23 AM
May 2017

Claude Taylor
@TrueFactsStated
Veteran of three presidential campaigns, served on White House staff (Clinton). Actively engaged in protecting and preserving our democracy.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
45. Same as Woodward and Bernstein. The truth in print.
Fri May 5, 2017, 10:28 AM
May 2017

Likewise for Louise Mensch, Olbermann, and all the others collaborating, reporting, and working diligently day in and day out to bring the facts to the fore.

hatrack

(59,584 posts)
47. Blahblahblahblahblah - when AFP, and Deutsche Welle and the Guardian have it, I'll believe it . . .
Fri May 5, 2017, 10:55 AM
May 2017

Not before then.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
48. New Olbermann‏ VIDEO: Comey confirms? - VA Grand Jury impaneled - #TrumpRussia
Fri May 5, 2017, 11:33 AM
May 2017
"These are the most important events in the investigation of Trump and Russia since the day of the Presidential election."


chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
49. I wont get my hopes up. I fully expect a report to be released in October 2018 saying
Fri May 5, 2017, 12:17 PM
May 2017

there will be no charges to anyone.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
54. Senate Asks Trump Associates for Records of Communication With Russians
Fri May 5, 2017, 04:53 PM
May 2017
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/us/politics/senate-russia-trump-associates.html

By MATTHEW ROSENBERG and MAGGIE HABERMAN
May 5, 2017

WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee, seeking to accelerate its broad investigation into Russian meddling in the presidential election, has asked a number of high-profile Trump campaign associates to hand over emails and other records of communications and dealings with Russian officials and businesspeople.

The requests, made in letters sent by the committee in the past 10 days, are a preliminary step and open the way to subpoenas for anyone who does not comply, said two officials with knowledge of the Senate investigation. They said Senator Richard M. Burr, a North Carolina Republican who is chairman of the committee, was prepared to compel the Trump associates to turn over their records. ..................


And this just popped too:

0rganism

(23,944 posts)
68. smells a lot like Fitzmas
Fri May 5, 2017, 06:33 PM
May 2017

i'm not going to be holding my breath, especially when placing hope in Comey's FBI
i really think if anything is going to stop our slide into fascism it has to happen in Nov. 2018, and it has to happen in a very convincing manner

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Comey is moving towards d...