Trump Administration Cites Segregation-Era Ruling To Defend Its Travel Ban

[sheshe2]

WASHINGTON ― In a brief defending its ban on citizens from six Muslim-majority countries, President Donald Trump’s Justice Department approvingly cited a segregation-era Supreme Court decision that allowed Jackson, Mississippi, to close public pools rather than integrate them.


In the early 1960s, courts ordered Jackson to desegregate its public parks, which included five swimming pools. Instead, the city decided to close the pools. Black residents of Jackson sued. But in 1971, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, decided that closing the pools rather than integrating them was just fine.


The dissents, even at the time, were furious. “May a State in order to avoid integration of the races abolish all of its public schools?” Justice William O. Douglas asked in his dissent.


“I had thought official policies forbidding or discouraging joint use of public facilities by Negroes and whites were at war with the Equal Protection Clause” of the Fourteenth Amendment, Justice Byron White wrote in another dissent. “Our cases make it unquestionably clear, as all of us agree, that a city or State may not enforce such a policy by maintaining officially separate facilities for the two races. It is also my view, but apparently not that of the majority, that a State may not have an official stance against desegregating public facilities and implement it by closing those facilities in response to a desegregation order.”

snip

“When it is absolutely clear that an official acted for unconstitutional purposes … [the courts] should be willing to strike down that decision because, even though the decision might have been reached legitimately, a public official violates the constitution when he or she acts for unconstitutional reasons,” Brest said. “It’s as simple as that. … Race discrimination is the best example of where courts are quite willing to take people’s motivations into account — or religious discrimination.”

More: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1002&stop=1

See bolding. Is this not exactly what Yates was talking about today?

Oh and Beauregard...FU!

[brer cat]

1. She made a similar point.

That picture is terrifying. He is one angry boy that he is not getting his way, and his elf looks petrified. I will be so glad when these people are gone by whatever means it takes.

[sheshe2]

2. T has dead eyes, nothing there.

B looks like a dear caught in the headlights. Both so far out of their league.

[spanone]

3. i'm sure jeffrey beauregard sesstions III is well schooled in that era of politics

[sheshe2]

4. Well schooled.

He wrote many chapters in that book.

[spanone]

5. Amen.