General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBuried treasure, the Caped Avoider, and Tax Haven U.S.A.
from Vanity Fair: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/08/investigating-mitt-romney-offshore-accounts
BURIED TREASURE Grand Cayman, where Bain Capital maintains at least 138 funds. Inset, Mitt Romney tries to spot his La Jolla home from the campaign plane.
. . . As Newt Gingrich put it during the primary season, I dont know of any American president who has had a Swiss bank account. But Romney has, as well as other interests in such tax havens as Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.
To give but one example, there is a Bermuda-based entity called Sankaty High Yield Asset Investors Ltd., which has been described in securities filings as a Bermuda corporation wholly owned by W. Mitt Romney. It could be that Sankaty is an old vehicle with little importance, but Romney appears to have treated it rather carefully. He set it up in 1997, then transferred it to his wifes newly created blind trust on January 1, 2003, the day before he was inaugurated as Massachusettss governor. The director and president of this entity is R. Bradford Malt, the trustee of the blind trust and Romneys personal lawyer. Romney failed to list this entity on several financial disclosures, even though such a closely held entity would not qualify as an excepted investment fund that would not need to be on his disclosure forms. He finally included it on his 2010 tax return. Even after examining that return, we have no idea what is in this company, but it could be valuable, meaning that it is possible Romneys wealth is even greater than previous estimates. While the Romneys spokespeople insist that the couple has paid all the taxes required by law, investments in tax havens such as Bermuda raise many questions, because they are in jurisdictions where there is virtually no tax and virtually no compliance, as one Miami-based offshore lawyer put it.
Thats not the only money Romney has in tax havens. Because of his retirement deal with Bain Capital, his finances are still deeply entangled with the private-equity firm that he founded and spun off from Bain and Co. in 1984. Though he left the firm in 1999, Romney has continued to receive large payments from itin early June he revealed more than $2 million in new Bain income. The firm today has at least 138 funds organized in the Cayman Islands, and Romney himself has personal interests in at least 12, worth as much as $30 million, hidden behind controversial confidentiality disclaimers. Again, the Romney campaign insists he saves no tax by using them, but there is no way to check this.
____ Mitts and Anns I.R.A.s have also been receiving profit interest from (mostly Cayman Islandbased) Bain Capital funds that were set up long after he had left the company, in 1999. For example, the 2010 return reveals a profits interest in a Cayman-based fund called Bain Capital Partners (AM) X LP, which was transferred to the Ann D. Romney trust in October 2010. An attachment to the return says the Ann D. Romney trust is performing services to the partnership, which is boilerplate language for these kinds of filings. Her blind trust could receive lightly taxed income from Bain Capital for years to come, well into the presidential term her husband hopes to win . . .
Romneys I.R.A. also appears to have invested in so-called blocker corporations in the Cayman Islands and elsewhere. U.S. pension funds, foundations, and even I.R.A.s routinely use offshore blocker corporations to avoid something called the Unrelated Business Income Tax, which was designed to keep nonprofits from competing with ordinary companies in areas outside their core purpose: if you invest directly you get hit with the tax, but if you invest in a blocker, which then invests in the U.S. business, you escape it. Romneys I.R.A. appears to have employed this lawful escape route, and his campaign has used language suggesting that it has. But that would mean the Romney camps claim that Mitts tax consequences of investing via the Cayman Islands is the very same as it would have been had he invested directly at home is simply not true . . .
read more: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/08/investigating-mitt-romney-offshore-accounts