General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou can't make this stuff up
Notice the sub-headline of this NYT front page:
And then today:
Right down to Henry Fucking Kissinger:
You just can't make this shit up.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)except this is much more sinister than a bad burglary to gain political advantage.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)With Nixon collaborating with the North Vietnamese. Larry O'Brien had an office in the Watergate bldg. Nixon wanted the tape. So it was about a Repuke candidate working directly with an enemy to get elected. Same/Same.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Nixon to gain some favors. But the favors they might have gained would have been fairly limited. It was just North Vietnam after all.
Russia being able to blackmail the President of the US can call in massive favors. That's considerably different.
The other key difference was the GOP did not control congress in 1974.
So the similarities have real limitations.
This is much worse, but still show the lengths repubs wil go to win.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,816 posts)Somehow I've never heard that before. I always heard they were planning to steal documents and bug the phones of the DNC. And even a quick check online says nothing about a tape. In fact, it's not entirely clear that Nixon actually knew about the break-in until after, although he then did his best to cover everything up.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Where has that claim been made, in relation to getting a "tape", and why would bugging the DNC help at all in that endeavor?
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Proof - NONE
Was Nixon a paranoid Prick?
Why would Nixon, with a clear path to victory in '72, authorize a break in?
http://articles.latimes.com/1990-09-29/news/mn-1122_1_watergate-scandal
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The mere fact that an official of the DNC had worked for Johnson is no great surprise.
"Why would Nixon, with a clear path to victory in '72, authorize a break in?"
There is nothing which I have ever come across which substantiates that claim either.
The problem with the break-in is that it exposed operatives and methods which the WH had been using for a variety of things. That's why the investigation needed to be de-railed, and Nixon was certainly complicit in the attempted coverup.
It would have been bone stupid, for the reason you point out, for Nixon to have authorized the actual Watergate break in, but there is nobody involved with it - even the convicted conspirators who had nothing to lose when they wrote their books - who has ever suggested he did.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)Wait, that sounds familiar!
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,610 posts)and Larry O'Brien was the chairman of the DNC. It was O'Brien's office that was broken into; Nixon wanted to know what information O'Brien had on him. The "Plumbers" group was established to plug leaks, including possible information about the North Vietnam collaboration (there does not seem to be an actual tape of this). But the burglars were there to bug the phones.
Laf.La.Dem.
(2,940 posts)Fuck you!
malaise
(268,717 posts)by Hillary
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But there is no reason to assume that a Secretary of State would not have cordial relations with a former Secretary of State, nor is there any reason to assume that a Senator from New York would not have cordial relations with a prominent resident of New York.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)He also has serious ties to Russia. It is not a coincidence that he was there.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)They are not chums.
RKP5637
(67,088 posts)hibbing
(10,095 posts)kentuck
(111,053 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Nobody would buy your book. The fiction would be too unbelievable.
madokie
(51,076 posts)crimes against humanity for both of them too
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)...posing questions to the portraits of his predecessors.
I hope the current WH staff have taken appropriate precautions to protect the portraits of past Presidents -- and especially First Ladies -- from the inevitable rage-induced actions of the current -- and soon to be evicted -- illegal occupant of that national landmark.
TrollBuster9090
(5,953 posts)Deja vu all over again.
DOES THIS MEAN WE CAN DO ANOTHER WOODSTOCK?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...but maybe we can talk Yoko Ono into breaking up One Direction.
BigmanPigman
(51,568 posts)MFM008
(19,803 posts)In history.