Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You can't make this stuff up (Original Post) jberryhill May 2017 OP
History is repeating itself to a degree Jarqui May 2017 #1
The burglary was to get the tape Nixon thought Johnson had rufus dog May 2017 #7
The North Vietnamese might have been able to blackmail Jarqui May 2017 #8
agreed rufus dog May 2017 #9
Really? PoindexterOglethorpe May 2017 #13
I'd also like substantiation of that claim jberryhill May 2017 #21
The theory is Larry O'Brien had info on Nixon passed on from Johnson rufus dog May 2017 #23
Your link states no such theory jberryhill May 2017 #24
It was the cover up that did him in tavalon May 2017 #25
It was specifically to bug the phones and photograph documents in the DNC office, The Velveteen Ocelot May 2017 #27
Message to the American people! Laf.La.Dem. May 2017 #2
Except that Kissinger was considered a friend malaise May 2017 #3
So was Trump jberryhill May 2017 #4
Exactly. nt pnwmom May 2017 #14
But... mzteaze May 2017 #6
They had a cordial relationship, as two diplomatic people dealing with each other. pnwmom May 2017 #15
Yep, Dj Vu! n/t RKP5637 May 2017 #5
War criminal n/t hibbing May 2017 #10
Some type of vortex or time warp? kentuck May 2017 #11
If you DID make it up Nevernose May 2017 #12
He and old hank both need to be in lock up madokie May 2017 #16
One BIG Difference: Democrats Controlled Congress while Nixon was President. berni_mccoy May 2017 #17
In Nixon's final days (daze?) he allegedly roamed the WH halls Fritz Walter May 2017 #18
Oh well, you can't blame little Donny for wanting to re-live his youth. TrollBuster9090 May 2017 #19
It's too late for woodstock... jberryhill May 2017 #22
Back then the dems were in congress and that means everything. It is NOT the same for that reason. BigmanPigman May 2017 #20
Dumbest bastard perhaps MFM008 May 2017 #26

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
1. History is repeating itself to a degree
Wed May 10, 2017, 04:33 PM
May 2017

except this is much more sinister than a bad burglary to gain political advantage.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
7. The burglary was to get the tape Nixon thought Johnson had
Wed May 10, 2017, 04:56 PM
May 2017

With Nixon collaborating with the North Vietnamese. Larry O'Brien had an office in the Watergate bldg. Nixon wanted the tape. So it was about a Repuke candidate working directly with an enemy to get elected. Same/Same.

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
8. The North Vietnamese might have been able to blackmail
Wed May 10, 2017, 05:01 PM
May 2017

Nixon to gain some favors. But the favors they might have gained would have been fairly limited. It was just North Vietnam after all.

Russia being able to blackmail the President of the US can call in massive favors. That's considerably different.

The other key difference was the GOP did not control congress in 1974.

So the similarities have real limitations.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,816 posts)
13. Really?
Wed May 10, 2017, 06:21 PM
May 2017

Somehow I've never heard that before. I always heard they were planning to steal documents and bug the phones of the DNC. And even a quick check online says nothing about a tape. In fact, it's not entirely clear that Nixon actually knew about the break-in until after, although he then did his best to cover everything up.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
21. I'd also like substantiation of that claim
Wed May 10, 2017, 08:48 PM
May 2017

Where has that claim been made, in relation to getting a "tape", and why would bugging the DNC help at all in that endeavor?
 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
23. The theory is Larry O'Brien had info on Nixon passed on from Johnson
Wed May 10, 2017, 11:44 PM
May 2017

Proof - NONE

Was Nixon a paranoid Prick?

Why would Nixon, with a clear path to victory in '72, authorize a break in?


http://articles.latimes.com/1990-09-29/news/mn-1122_1_watergate-scandal

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
24. Your link states no such theory
Wed May 10, 2017, 11:51 PM
May 2017

The mere fact that an official of the DNC had worked for Johnson is no great surprise.

"Why would Nixon, with a clear path to victory in '72, authorize a break in?"

There is nothing which I have ever come across which substantiates that claim either.

The problem with the break-in is that it exposed operatives and methods which the WH had been using for a variety of things. That's why the investigation needed to be de-railed, and Nixon was certainly complicit in the attempted coverup.

It would have been bone stupid, for the reason you point out, for Nixon to have authorized the actual Watergate break in, but there is nobody involved with it - even the convicted conspirators who had nothing to lose when they wrote their books - who has ever suggested he did.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,610 posts)
27. It was specifically to bug the phones and photograph documents in the DNC office,
Thu May 11, 2017, 12:50 AM
May 2017

and Larry O'Brien was the chairman of the DNC. It was O'Brien's office that was broken into; Nixon wanted to know what information O'Brien had on him. The "Plumbers" group was established to plug leaks, including possible information about the North Vietnam collaboration (there does not seem to be an actual tape of this). But the burglars were there to bug the phones.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. So was Trump
Wed May 10, 2017, 04:49 PM
May 2017

But there is no reason to assume that a Secretary of State would not have cordial relations with a former Secretary of State, nor is there any reason to assume that a Senator from New York would not have cordial relations with a prominent resident of New York.

pnwmom

(108,959 posts)
15. They had a cordial relationship, as two diplomatic people dealing with each other.
Wed May 10, 2017, 06:33 PM
May 2017

They are not chums.

Fritz Walter

(4,291 posts)
18. In Nixon's final days (daze?) he allegedly roamed the WH halls
Wed May 10, 2017, 07:02 PM
May 2017

...posing questions to the portraits of his predecessors.

I hope the current WH staff have taken appropriate precautions to protect the portraits of past Presidents -- and especially First Ladies -- from the inevitable rage-induced actions of the current -- and soon to be evicted -- illegal occupant of that national landmark.

TrollBuster9090

(5,953 posts)
19. Oh well, you can't blame little Donny for wanting to re-live his youth.
Wed May 10, 2017, 07:06 PM
May 2017

Deja vu all over again.

DOES THIS MEAN WE CAN DO ANOTHER WOODSTOCK?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You can't make this stuff...