Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, the President has a right to fire the FBI Director. (Original Post) kentuck May 2017 OP
Yes, it does put it in a different light Mr. Ected May 2017 #1
That is his right as well Proud Liberal Dem May 2017 #2
The latter sounds like OOJ. boston bean May 2017 #3
The director supposedly assured him that he wasn't being investigated. ucrdem May 2017 #4
There were other agents and witnesses there... kentuck May 2017 #5
Oh I don't doubt that 99% of what he says is bullshit ucrdem May 2017 #6
Here is a link that is informative: kentuck May 2017 #7
Thanks, but it looks like the others weren't there after all. ucrdem May 2017 #8
One thing for sure. kentuck May 2017 #9
Yep. ucrdem May 2017 #10

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
1. Yes, it does put it in a different light
Fri May 12, 2017, 08:02 AM
May 2017

Under the circumstances, what Trump did would and should be considered obstruction of justice.

If Democrats held the House or anyone but Jeff Sessions sat at the head of the DOJ, that alone would be the subject of a Congressional investigation.

But alas, this is the USA, circa 2017, and the GOP is quite possibly a criminal organization. There will be no justice exacted until a path for prosecution is cleared, a path that only a genius can plot through the current minefield.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
2. That is his right as well
Fri May 12, 2017, 08:03 AM
May 2017

But it is suspicious as hell and only makes him look (more) guilty AND nobody can get their stories straight as to why Comey was fired.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
4. The director supposedly assured him that he wasn't being investigated.
Fri May 12, 2017, 08:13 AM
May 2017

Was it cricket to ask, whether or not he actually did? Probably not but how would Trump know otherwise?

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
5. There were other agents and witnesses there...
Fri May 12, 2017, 08:20 AM
May 2017

that said it didn't happen as Trump portrayed it.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
6. Oh I don't doubt that 99% of what he says is bullshit
Fri May 12, 2017, 08:26 AM
May 2017

but the fact that there was a dinner is probably all he needs for plausible deniability. The bar is infinitely low for Trump just like it was infinitely high for Barack.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
8. Thanks, but it looks like the others weren't there after all.
Fri May 12, 2017, 08:37 AM
May 2017

They're remembering what Comey told them afterward, and apparently Comey admits that he promised something, and that's all Trumpolini needs, as he can say he understood whatever transpired as an assurance that he wasn't under investigation.

p.s. this is getting international attention so I expect Trump will be twisting in the wind for awhile . . .

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes, the President has a ...