Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Justice

(7,185 posts)
Mon May 15, 2017, 04:12 PM May 2017

Twitter Update on Lawrence O'Donnell



Variety just posted:

"Lawrence O’Donnell, MSNBC in Talks for 10 PM Slot
Lawrence O'Donnell and MSNBC are in contract talks that could result in the anchor staying with his 10 p.m. show, "The Last Word."
90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Twitter Update on Lawrence O'Donnell (Original Post) Justice May 2017 OP
Good irisblue May 2017 #1
Yes! onecaliberal May 2017 #2
How stupid would it be..... ProudMNDemocrat May 2017 #3
They shit-canned their #1 show back before W's excellent adventures in empire gratuitous May 2017 #7
They also shit-canned Ed Shultz and Melissa Harris-Perry. TrollBuster9090 May 2017 #23
Don't forget dumping Olbermann at his peak. MSNBC wants to be Fox. Plain and simple. TeamPooka May 2017 #26
Yeah, I'd forgotten about that. I don't think they want to be Fox. I just think TrollBuster9090 May 2017 #31
!!! Alice11111 May 2017 #37
Phil Donahue in 1996, emphatically yes. But the others? Hortensis May 2017 #40
You have to credit Keith Olbermann for....... ProudMNDemocrat May 2017 #63
Hi. Sure. I watched Olbermann for years, Hortensis May 2017 #66
Would that be Morton Downey Junior? nt usedtobedemgurl May 2017 #70
Yes! You know, there's a real resemblance between Hortensis May 2017 #72
Yes, he was awful... usedtobedemgurl May 2017 #76
I read he was often very different in person in Hortensis May 2017 #79
Trump is hardly capable of anything.... usedtobedemgurl May 2017 #83
Seriously, social scientists say strong right-wing ideologues Hortensis May 2017 #84
Also Shultz aired a weeks worth of stories, a segment a day on the victims of the BP Dustlawyer May 2017 #41
See Below DownriverDem May 2017 #73
I know about Ed, but I know what he did then too. Dustlawyer May 2017 #88
Ed is now NewRedDawn May 2017 #46
YEs and boy does Schultz defend his actions Alittle off the rails he went FloridaBlues May 2017 #53
About Ed Shultz DownriverDem May 2017 #69
Don't forget Tamryn Hall. displacedtexan May 2017 #75
Yep, I remember that well. n/t AwakeAtLast May 2017 #87
+++++++++++ YES! skylucy May 2017 #10
And they're not really going to do better at that time of day. Renew Deal May 2017 #13
the way MSNBC has been going NewJeffCT May 2017 #20
That is exactly what they are going to do Bill O or similar (nt) Valhallakey May 2017 #22
And Sean Hannity waiting in the wings. I don't like MSNBC one bit, but watch it because it RKP5637 May 2017 #29
Their prime time line up is terrific Generic Brad May 2017 #54
Yes, those are the three I watch. Hopefully they will last under Comcast. n/t RKP5637 May 2017 #55
I was thinking the same thing, but maybe he, Ailes, &DT Alice11111 May 2017 #39
Van Susteren's ratings are terrible Brainstormy May 2017 #68
Hopefully they'll ink a nice deal awesomerwb May 2017 #4
Good news! n/t Different Drummer May 2017 #5
I've barraged them with correspondence Dem2 May 2017 #6
Me too. calls to NbCUNI, Comcast and four separate email addresses. hlthe2b May 2017 #30
If you have other places to call or email, can you post them here on new trending thread: Amaryllis May 2017 #89
Where did you send them? I sent to moonscape May 2017 #58
nbcuniversalviewerfeedback@nbcuni.com Amaryllis May 2017 #77
MSNBC needs to keep LOD. They really should not want to be on the wrong side of history. WinkyDink May 2017 #8
Message deleted by DU the Administrators Little Star May 2017 #9
good Laf.La.Dem. May 2017 #11
Go here and see where to call Comcast about this: Amaryllis May 2017 #12
Just called 215-286-1700. zentrum May 2017 #14
Same with me. I couldn't get through. Which is a good sign. I think we liberals StevieM May 2017 #19
I just called the number you posted and I got through. Told them that I was a longtime fan of politicaljunkie41910 May 2017 #21
Excellent message! nt zentrum May 2017 #56
WooHoo! Maybe they heard from enough fans . . . CousinIT May 2017 #15
Message deleted by DU the Administrators liberal from boston May 2017 #36
Wow. Thank you for doing that! CousinIT May 2017 #44
Excellent! May he double down on that imbecile in the WH. nolabear May 2017 #16
+1!! berksdem May 2017 #17
Called NBC gibraltar72 May 2017 #18
I used those words too... "go dark" lamp_shade May 2017 #32
I'd hate to lose O'Donnell's expert explanations of Hortensis May 2017 #86
Good. nt Honeycombe8 May 2017 #24
Called and emailed Comcast and NBC today. nt cry baby May 2017 #25
Yay Soxfan58 May 2017 #27
Message deleted by DU the Administrators Lazy Daisy May 2017 #28
I called and gave my voice of support for Lawrence.. chillfactor May 2017 #33
I also emailed the powers that be. chillfactor May 2017 #34
Yeah! I just tried calling both numbers and both were busy, busy, busy... BigmanPigman May 2017 #35
Sounds good. If they are talking they will find a way to agree. grantcart May 2017 #38
Phew! mchill May 2017 #42
MSNBC would be absolutely BONKERS to let him go !! flying-skeleton May 2017 #43
Good. nt SunSeeker May 2017 #45
Good - KT2000 May 2017 #47
When someone shows you who he is, tavernier May 2017 #48
We had Mark Russell during Watergate Stargleamer May 2017 #49
Lawrence is the best, remember the tent guy? flamingdem May 2017 #50
Good. About time! n/t GP6971 May 2017 #51
I don't trust them. Might be a ploy to hang on to their ratings for a few weeks Jarqui May 2017 #52
Keep him on SCantiGOP May 2017 #57
Great news...should have never been under discussion anyway. Lawrence is excellent TV anchor iluvtennis May 2017 #59
i hope so. i love his show. DesertFlower May 2017 #60
Lawrence O'Donnell puts it all up there and calms me down onecent May 2017 #61
Who can we call or email to support Lawrence?? flamingdem May 2017 #62
Letters@MSNBC.com or call Comcast 215-286-1700. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #64
done! flamingdem May 2017 #67
Also if you tweet: @LackAndy @MSNBC @Lawrence -Please RETWEET Madam45for2923 May 2017 #71
EXCELLENT!! ElementaryPenguin May 2017 #65
Retweeting plus K&R yuiyoshida May 2017 #74
Sadly False dsharp88 May 2017 #78
Yay! workinclasszero May 2017 #80
good I hope so bdamomma May 2017 #81
If you want to give NBC a little nudge, leftieNanner May 2017 #82
What time is he on there now? mahina May 2017 #85
I am so glad, hope they come to their senses and keep him. Shannon1981 May 2017 #90

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,730 posts)
3. How stupid would it be.....
Mon May 15, 2017, 04:20 PM
May 2017


To can the #2 rated show on the network that brings in viewers and money.

If it were not for Chris Hayes, Rachel Maddow, and Lawrence O'Donnell, this viewer would be somewhere else. These 3 make some sense of the insane world that is the Trump era.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. They shit-canned their #1 show back before W's excellent adventures in empire
Mon May 15, 2017, 04:25 PM
May 2017

Phil Donahue wasn't getting his war on to suit the suits in the suites, and found himself out of a job in early 2003.

TrollBuster9090

(5,953 posts)
23. They also shit-canned Ed Shultz and Melissa Harris-Perry.
Mon May 15, 2017, 05:15 PM
May 2017

Shultz because he was too friendly to unions, and Harris-Perry because she was, well...no other way to put it...TOO UPITY. And then they made room for Gretta Van Susternen. It's the stupidest corporate move since they changed the formula for COKE.

TrollBuster9090

(5,953 posts)
31. Yeah, I'd forgotten about that. I don't think they want to be Fox. I just think
Mon May 15, 2017, 05:28 PM
May 2017

I just think they are, like all MSM clowns, worried about being labelled 'too liberal.' So they want to get rid of some of the people who appear to be too partisan, and replace them with a few country club Republicans, and then claim to be 'fair and balanced.'

Ironically, 'fair and balanced' Fox News is the most biased, politically partisan network of them all, and they raked in a FORTUNE by appealing to a politically partisan group of viewers. So, if MSNBC is still interested in making money, they're doing the wrong thing. If they trying to chase the mythical fair and balanced journalist title, they're just being stupid and self destructive.

But then again, that's the one thing that the right wing news media has that the left wing news media doesn't. SHAMELESSNESS. They KNOW everybody is snickering at them when they say they're 'unbiased,' but they don't care. They care more about winning and making money than they do about people snickering at them. And I can't say that about the center-left media world.

As Bill Maher said about Democratic politicians: "All you have to do is accuse somebody of being a liberal, and he'll put on an orange vest and run off to the woods to kill animals." Funny, but painfully true.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
40. Phil Donahue in 1996, emphatically yes. But the others?
Mon May 15, 2017, 06:09 PM
May 2017

I don't like the networks' picking up right-wing commentators either. But that doesn't mean they want to be Fox. Fox's viewership is dying off from old age and calcified brains. Young people, who are far less conservative than Fox's viewers, even the young conservatives, are the ones the advertisers want to draw.

People on the far left should, for the sake of their own understanding, recognize and accept that their numbers are too small for good representation by a network. MSNBC, to its credit, tried some shows aimed more their way a couple decades after Donahue was suppressed, and it didn't work. But, notably, Donahue was not a radical with a radical message. He was a liberal pushing progressive messages to a hugely receptive mainstream audience. This difference that was the key to his great success.

As for Ed Schultz, let's face it. He is better suited to radicals watching RT than to typical left-wingers. I didn't like his style on MSNBC, and if he came back on his knees and toes the MSNBC line I wouldn't watch him after RT.

"Uppity's" an effective dog whistle in many situations, but it doesn't apply to Melissa. They gave her a platform to address social justice and women's issues, and she just didn't draw enough viewership, even with Rachel following. I found wallowing each night in discussion of the latest outrages and endless hashing over needed solutions more depressing than stimulating. So I eventually spent little time with Melissa (and also turned off Rachel on her abortion rights jags) preferring shorter print news updates.

Obermann's exit ended well-publicized several-year conflicts with his bosses; lots of personalities involved, not just issues. Yes, they did want him to tone his combative message down, but he could have done that and still held his hill. He chose not to, and eventually the pot finally boiled over. I was sorry.

Btw, fwiw, except for Rachel on video, and O'Donnell on video occasionally, I don't watch cable news at all. Their outrageously dishonest and irresponsible coverage of the election caused me to say no more. I recommend it.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,730 posts)
63. You have to credit Keith Olbermann for.......
Tue May 16, 2017, 10:28 AM
May 2017


launching both Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell to where they are now. You cannot imagine how I miss COUNTDOWN.

I loved watching Ed Schultz, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris Perry, Cenk Uyger(The Young Turks), even the Cycle. These shows are/were far superior than anything on CNN or FOX.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
66. Hi. Sure. I watched Olbermann for years,
Tue May 16, 2017, 10:43 AM
May 2017

and then Rachel and O'Donnell. The latter are still watched a lot of the time.

MSNBC'sevening lineup is far superior to the budget daytime one, but I took to heart results of studies reporting that, on testing, Fox viewers knew less about their nation and world than people who watched no news at all (!) but that, though CNN and MSNBC viewers did know more than the no-news people, they really weren't all that much better.

MSNBC is not a news network, of course, which accounts for some of it, but their programming was also so appallingly dishonest and self-serving during the election campaigns (not worse than before, just with such obvious destructive effect) that I said goodbye to almost all of it. Same for CNN.

Interesting how political talk shows seem to get more fact-based in the late hours, something that must reflect different audiences.

Do you or anyone remember the old long-running Nightline with Ted Koppel long, long ago? Great, intelligent show. For a long time I waited for it by watching through a horror of a right-wing political program that preceded it. Wish I could remember the guy's name, think he had a mental breakdown later or something. He used a sort of gladiatorial format where he would do verbal battle with "liberals" chosen for their extreme inarticulateness and scrawny builds, and he'd stride in and do a ritual rape of a couple of women from the audience (grab and "kiss" them Trump-style) before engaging.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
72. Yes! You know, there's a real resemblance between
Tue May 16, 2017, 11:58 AM
May 2017

him and tRump, and also Gov. Christie when he'd threaten constituents by bearing down with his 300 pounds and shoving his face in theirs to deliver his insults. Downey was way over the top on his show, but they all offer a domineering thuggery that their particular fans love.





Just think of the contrast with liberal shows, which have NEVER offered animal boorishness and brutishness as a product. I like to think that back then some thoughtful, more moderate conservatives were also waiting for Nightline, which ran from 1980-2005 (just looked). Fox News opened in 1996, and after that most conservatives insisted all other news sources were corrupt.

usedtobedemgurl

(1,129 posts)
76. Yes, he was awful...
Tue May 16, 2017, 12:43 PM
May 2017

if I recall, he would smoke and blow the smoke in people's faces but I am not sure if that is a correct recollection. I believe he died of cancer.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
79. I read he was often very different in person in
Tue May 16, 2017, 01:55 PM
May 2017

looking for those pictures. He'd certainly have had to be. But he regretted much of his boorishness and did a lot of apologizing to individuals he'd behaved badly to before his death, not in fear of fire but rather of being remembered for his worst.

I feel sure tRump is simply not capable of that level of self awareness, so in that there is no comparison.

usedtobedemgurl

(1,129 posts)
83. Trump is hardly capable of anything....
Tue May 16, 2017, 03:06 PM
May 2017

but especially not of self reflection. He is no more capable of it than the cronies who support him instead of our country.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
84. Seriously, social scientists say strong right-wing ideologues
Tue May 16, 2017, 03:11 PM
May 2017

are strikingly lacking in self awareness, as are their counterparts on the left. They simply can't evaluate their own behavior.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
41. Also Shultz aired a weeks worth of stories, a segment a day on the victims of the BP
Mon May 15, 2017, 06:18 PM
May 2017

oil spill that no one else would air for fear of losing ad dollars. BP would advertise way more than normal for the first 3 years of the spill to keep the victim's stories out of the news and have everyone believe they had settled the claims out of the non-existent $20 billion dollar fund.

He was let go two months later. I would think it played a part of why they let him go, but his support of Bernie was the main one I would guess.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
88. I know about Ed, but I know what he did then too.
Tue May 16, 2017, 04:51 PM
May 2017

My point wasn't so much about Ed but what he did and the blowback for doing it.

It was very frustrating to see my clients suffering from delays and the media would not touch the story for fear of the loss of ad dollars. BP even bought up all of the documentaries until the heat passed.

 

NewRedDawn

(790 posts)
46. Ed is now
Mon May 15, 2017, 06:47 PM
May 2017

from what I hear a Trumputinista now whoring for both on RT. I use to enjoy him, but I guess he just whores for whoever the paymaster is.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
20. the way MSNBC has been going
Mon May 15, 2017, 05:02 PM
May 2017

I'm surprised they don't have Bill O'Reilly lined up to take over for him.

RKP5637

(67,089 posts)
29. And Sean Hannity waiting in the wings. I don't like MSNBC one bit, but watch it because it
Mon May 15, 2017, 05:26 PM
May 2017

seems to be the best we have. Lose a few more and I'll be gone.

Generic Brad

(14,272 posts)
54. Their prime time line up is terrific
Mon May 15, 2017, 09:07 PM
May 2017

Chris Hayes. National treasure Rachel Maddow. Lawrence O'Donnell.

It's hard to label them as right wing when they have 3 impartial shows every weekday evening.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
39. I was thinking the same thing, but maybe he, Ailes, &DT
Mon May 15, 2017, 06:05 PM
May 2017

Will just start thir own more RW version of Fox. DTs would be in a blind trust, of course, and Eric would make sure that dad had no knowledge of it, except for the regular meetings to update him.

What an unbelievable shitcan world the USA is in.

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
6. I've barraged them with correspondence
Mon May 15, 2017, 04:23 PM
May 2017

I'm sure they got 10's of thousands of calls/emails/tweets. Let's hope they're serious.

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
58. Where did you send them? I sent to
Mon May 15, 2017, 10:52 PM
May 2017

a suggested address nbcuniversalviewfeedback@nbcuni.com but it bounced 'no such user'

I'd like to send my nice little write-up to someone

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
14. Just called 215-286-1700.
Mon May 15, 2017, 04:41 PM
May 2017

.....Their corporate offices, but all lines were full. Will remain open until 6pm.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
19. Same with me. I couldn't get through. Which is a good sign. I think we liberals
Mon May 15, 2017, 04:56 PM
May 2017

are the ones who tied up all their lines.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
21. I just called the number you posted and I got through. Told them that I was a longtime fan of
Mon May 15, 2017, 05:05 PM
May 2017

"The Last Word" and I would be very disappointed if his contract was not renewed. I also told them that I was disappointed with the decision to give more of the liberal time slots to rightwingers who have their own networks and dominate talk radio, particularly the slot given to Greta Van Susteran and Nicole Wallace. While I like Nicole as a person, I didn't think she deserved that time slot at the expense of a true liberal. Besides, it was people like her that tried to normalize Trump by saying that "my Dad is a big fan of his" and now we're stuck with someone whose ill equipped for the job and threatens our democracy and our relationship with our allies.

CousinIT

(9,225 posts)
15. WooHoo! Maybe they heard from enough fans . . .
Mon May 15, 2017, 04:42 PM
May 2017

Or they decided not to be stupid and allow their 2nd highest rated show to end.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
86. I'd hate to lose O'Donnell's expert explanations of
Tue May 16, 2017, 03:31 PM
May 2017

what Congress is up to. They've been very enlightening over the years, often pointing out perception-alteringrealities that go unmentioned elsewhere. That said, I can have Lawrence wherever ELSE he goes.

I will not bother watching or taping Brian Williams. Never have. No specific animus, he's just a null figure, his entire career spent riding high on TV new's slide into the gutter. As far as I'm concerned, he represents the gutter.

chillfactor

(7,573 posts)
33. I called and gave my voice of support for Lawrence..
Mon May 15, 2017, 05:28 PM
May 2017

also a plug for Rachel.....I was given an email address as well.

nbcuniversalviewfeedback@nbcuni.com

BigmanPigman

(51,570 posts)
35. Yeah! I just tried calling both numbers and both were busy, busy, busy...
Mon May 15, 2017, 05:47 PM
May 2017

I emailed two letters and told them to give him a raise, give joy a nightly spot, and dump Greta and her pals.

tavernier

(12,370 posts)
48. When someone shows you who he is,
Mon May 15, 2017, 07:01 PM
May 2017

believe him.

There is nothing that this man has ever said or done that would make me think he is a false prophet.

If he leaves, I'll follow.



Stargleamer

(1,987 posts)
49. We had Mark Russell during Watergate
Mon May 15, 2017, 08:46 PM
May 2017

we could really use Lawrence O'Donnell during this time period.

Now more than ever.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
50. Lawrence is the best, remember the tent guy?
Mon May 15, 2017, 08:48 PM
May 2017

Blue tent guy.. can't even remember the correct term but it was during the bird sanctuary takeover.

Lawrence knows how to report LIVE too as he did in that case.

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
52. I don't trust them. Might be a ploy to hang on to their ratings for a few weeks
Mon May 15, 2017, 09:03 PM
May 2017

I'll believe it when the press release comes out that he's been extended.

Of all the people in the TV media who were on to Trump, I felt O'Donnell was way out in front - well before he became a candidate - back with the birther stuff in 2011 or maybe before


onecent

(6,096 posts)
61. Lawrence O'Donnell puts it all up there and calms me down
Tue May 16, 2017, 08:07 AM
May 2017

after listening to all the other stuff... DON'T GET RID OF HIM!!!!

 

Madam45for2923

(7,178 posts)
71. Also if you tweet: @LackAndy @MSNBC @Lawrence -Please RETWEET
Tue May 16, 2017, 11:49 AM
May 2017

@LackAndy @MSNBC @Lawrence

I never ask for retweets but,

Please RETWEET to let MSNBC know that we support keeping Lawrence O'Donnell!






ElementaryPenguin

(7,800 posts)
65. EXCELLENT!!
Tue May 16, 2017, 10:42 AM
May 2017

It's music to my ears the way he begins EVERY statement with "Donald Trump...______ is the most corrupt, clueless, ignorant, traitorous human being to ever occupy the White House..."

It makes my day, no matter what kind of day it's been.

dsharp88

(487 posts)
78. Sadly False
Tue May 16, 2017, 01:12 PM
May 2017

It looks like he's out. Apparently, MSNBC wants to move Brian Williams' 11th Hour up an hour to Lawrence's spot. This despite good ratings for O'Donnell.

bdamomma

(63,803 posts)
81. good I hope so
Tue May 16, 2017, 01:59 PM
May 2017

Lawrence needs to stay. Period.

here is the number: 212 664 4444 or

phil.griffin@nbcuni.com

or the stupid guy who is a friend of trump

andrew.lack@nbcuniv.com

leftieNanner

(15,070 posts)
82. If you want to give NBC a little nudge,
Tue May 16, 2017, 02:07 PM
May 2017

email them and ask them to renew Lawrence's contract.

nbcuniversalviewerfeedback@nbcuni.com

I just did.

I like to watch The Last Word after Rachel every night because he looks at the news and politics from a slightly different angle. His experience working in the Senate gives him an interesting perspective.

mahina

(17,625 posts)
85. What time is he on there now?
Tue May 16, 2017, 03:27 PM
May 2017

It's afternoon and evening here, 4 and 7.

I'm still irked they took Rachel's 10 pm show away and gave it to the 11th hour. I don't get to watch her any more and she was my main reason for keeping the whole schmear, cable, tv, all of it. grrr

Shannon1981

(51 posts)
90. I am so glad, hope they come to their senses and keep him.
Tue May 16, 2017, 05:20 PM
May 2017

I actually wrote them an open letter on the progressive blog network I work for, emailed Phil Griffin and NBC Universal, and called NBC Universal and Comcast.

Personally, I think Andy Lack is at the bottom of all of this. When he returned in 2015 is when they started to slowly but surely lurch to the right. That's what got us 3 hours of Joe Scarborough, got us supposed "straight news" all day instead of shows like The Reid Report, Now With Alex Wagner, Ronan Farrow Daily, The Cycle, etc. It's what got us Nicolle Wallace at 4, Chuck Todd at 5, Greta Van Susteren at 6, and got Joy Reid and Al Sharpton shuttled to weekends while right-wingers got plum primetime slots.

Hopefully our pressure did something.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Twitter Update on Lawrenc...